Chris17404
Member
Hi all,
I am wondering why Glock pistols (at least to me) seem to get so much more criticism that "they're not safe" or "they really have no safety" or "I'd never carry a Glock with a round chambered" over other similar trigger-action pistols much as the new S&W M&P, or Walther P99, etc.
To me, there's really no difference, is there? They all have a relatively short trigger pull and no external safety (other than on the actual trigger). It seems like Glock gets a bad rap. Is it just because they've been around the longest?
Chris
I am wondering why Glock pistols (at least to me) seem to get so much more criticism that "they're not safe" or "they really have no safety" or "I'd never carry a Glock with a round chambered" over other similar trigger-action pistols much as the new S&W M&P, or Walther P99, etc.
To me, there's really no difference, is there? They all have a relatively short trigger pull and no external safety (other than on the actual trigger). It seems like Glock gets a bad rap. Is it just because they've been around the longest?
Chris