Tag
Member
Glock
I've been reading a lot of old TFL threads lately, and it's funny that whenever people say they "like Glock", someone always Says "well I like Sig's", and "I like 1911's".
This is all well and good, and in a way it works to everyone’s advantage, because a good 1911, just about any Sig, and any Glock, is a fine firearm and will serve the owner well.
By even comparing a Glock to a good 1911 you pay the Glock a compliment...
people may speculate on how much it actually costs to put a Glock on the market, and they may complain about the markup, but if you look at it relative to many other manufacturers it's a non issue.
They may not be 'revolutionary' or anywhere near 'perfection, but Glock's are exceptional combat pistols period. The slide/barrel fit is rock solid, they are incredibly easy to understand/shoot, and they last for hundreds of thousands of rounds with minimal parts replacement. Speaking of which, the parts are cheap and can be swapped out with no tools.
How can you go wrong?
I've been reading a lot of old TFL threads lately, and it's funny that whenever people say they "like Glock", someone always Says "well I like Sig's", and "I like 1911's".
This is all well and good, and in a way it works to everyone’s advantage, because a good 1911, just about any Sig, and any Glock, is a fine firearm and will serve the owner well.
By even comparing a Glock to a good 1911 you pay the Glock a compliment...
people may speculate on how much it actually costs to put a Glock on the market, and they may complain about the markup, but if you look at it relative to many other manufacturers it's a non issue.
They may not be 'revolutionary' or anywhere near 'perfection, but Glock's are exceptional combat pistols period. The slide/barrel fit is rock solid, they are incredibly easy to understand/shoot, and they last for hundreds of thousands of rounds with minimal parts replacement. Speaking of which, the parts are cheap and can be swapped out with no tools.
How can you go wrong?