Comments section is a mix of sad and hillarious.
The "spokesperson" for shark.org is willing to embrace any illegality as long as that oppresses what that same person sees as "the immorality of hunting."
So, not only do we see a video of deliberate FAA flight rules violation, and a hunter harrassment violation (which draws the County LE), the shark.org commentator has made comments supporting any future violation of hunter harassment. Video closing comments reports that they actions clised the hunting club, too.
Hmm, willful violation of FAA flight/safety rules?
Deliberate aforethought intention to violate hunters' rights laws?
Deliberate intentention to prevent a person engaging in lawful trade oe commerce?
Sounds a bit like an "admission against interest" to me, but, I'm only an RKI, not a barrister.