Alternative movies
I also like watching war movies. There you see two fighting sides and sometimes you observe good characters from both sides, who are set to be examples of bravery, courage, strength, fidelity and patriotism/commitment. Movies like Troy, Saving private Ryan, Enemy at the gates, Stalingrad, The squad, Apocalypse today and etc.
The movies of Soviet/post Soviet countries are the best for setting examples of absolute heroes - They fought for Motherland, Soldier's Father, Teheran 43, The Young Guard, Hot summer of Afghanistan, A Muslim and etc.
But there are alternative films, far from commonly accepted stereotypes. Such as Young Wolves (with Marlon Brando), The Purgatory (about Chechen war in 1994-96), The Valley of the Wolves (Turkish movie about Iraq campaign 2003-present).
I'd like to review the latter one.
Usually we are accustomed to see American GIs as young and brave heroes who found themselves in a far-from-ideal-picture situation, such as Somalia or Iraq and then during the film itself we see the transformation process of young conscience and forming a raw, battle hardened soldier. However, as we see in practice, not all the soldiers are ideally courageous and humane (which is strange in war movie). The Turkish movie Kurtlar Vadisi - Irak (The valley of the wolves - Iraq) is such a movie. It portrays Americans in Iraq as invaders and worst among them - the private contractors. Of course these bad guys are led by ultimate Villain of post-Cameron movies - a character played by Billy Zane. His excellence in acting is remarkably completed with presence of another villain - Gary Busy, who plays a crazy doctor, who takes intestines from Abu Ghraib prisoners.
Of course, this is a pure product of art, which gives its own interpretation to things usually silenced on the West or not liked to talk about. This movie, as press reports has infuriated American officials, but found mass interest on so-called Muslim street. Of course the resonance of a film which depicts Abu Ghraib prison, civilian casualties caused by friendly fire or misinterpretation of common mosques to be an insurgent hideouts, or problems to be resolved among Muslims themselves regarding Islamic teachings interpretations, should be as great as it was. There are, however shortcomings in the film, such as US soldiers played by Turks as well as Arabs and Kurds, which some Turks can't stand and etc. But the doubtless successful points made are: not all Muslims are radical, Iraq itself is not something unified, US are not always right and the notion of bringing democracy to Middle East may certainly radicalize Americans to the extent Zarqawi was and of course decent special effects for a war movie. That is why I liked this film and did not feel sorry on spent time and money.
Further the screenshots from the movie provided.