Got a new target gun

Status
Not open for further replies.

halfded

Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2009
Messages
826
Location
Virginia
019-1.gif

A Savage Mark II BTVXP. Same rifle as the BTV (and the BTVS minus the stainless finish) just came as a package deal with the scope.

The first rifle I bought when I turned 18 was a Savage Mark II with a field barrel and synthetic stock for $99 at walmart. Long story short, I've since owned 3 more of the same model (one in wood), but none have had the accu-trigger or a heavy barrel. The only other target rifle I owned was a Ruger 10/22 I spent a LOT of money on to shoot little groups.

I was looking around at Gander Mountain and happened to pick up a new version of the synthetic field model with accu-trigger. At the Gander here all the long guns are out for display/inspection, but are tethered to the wall by a corded trigger lock. The trigger lock wasn't installed properly on this one an I managed to get a finger in there to dry fire it (I know). I now needed an accu-trigger.

I checked the weekly circular for Dick's Sporting Goods and they had the wood stocked sporter version in a scope package for $159. By the time I got there, they had sold out of the Mark II's and only had one 93 left on hold. They called the other store across town who were also sold out. Crestfallen, I went home and resigned myself to buy the heavy barreled synthetic stocked model from the other store in the morning.

Got up bright and early and headed out. I got to the store right after it opened and was greeted at the gun counter by an older, very knowledgeable gentlemen that was very proud of the groups he had shot with his Contender pistol (they were impressive if he wasn't pulling my leg. Ragged hole groups from a .308 at 50 yards; standing supported on a post.)

Turns out the synthetic stock Mark II was actually whatever the Mark II is but chambered in .17HMR. Next to it, though, stood the object of my longtime affection. The laminate thumbhole stocked, heavy barrel Mark II, insert choir music and bright white light. Going price: $329. Upon closer inspection, it was wearing a Bushnell Sharpshooter 3-9x scope and being a display model, had been dry fired a few times leaving a light "bite mark" on the chamber face. Nothing that would affect performance.

Well, once I handled it I had to have it and walked out the door with it for $348. Used my rewards card so I'll be getting at least one, if not 2, $10 gift certificates in the mail for a new case or some ammo or something. The best part is that I only paid about $270 for it as the money came from some other things that I was able to sell at a slight profit, including my old Mark II.

This thing is accurate! Got it sighted in and the first group at 25 yards measured .248" center to center. I adjusted the accu-trigger all the way down (2.5lbs says the manual) and it was still kind of heavy, so I clipped a coil or 2 of the spring and it's probably around 1.5-2lbs now and crisp as can be.

My only gripe is the light strikes I'm getting from the guy behind the counter, and probably other customers, dry firing it. Looking at the bolt, the firing pin is peened a little. I called Savage and explained the situation and they're sending me a new firing pin free of charge as soon as they're back in stock.

It's been windy here the past few days, so I haven't done a whole lot of paper shooting. I set my steel targets at around 80 yards this afternoon (4",3", and 2"). I was hitting the larger 2 with relative ease with a front rest, and once I got the rear bag out, the little 2 inch plate wasn't much trouble either. Just watch the leaves, aim at the support bar the targets hang from (I"m sighted in at 50 yards), and shoot between gusts. BANG....PIINGG!! The delay between the gunshot and the target impact is kinda cool.

BTW, did I mention that's with the $1.47 a box Federal Champion ammo I swear by anytime someone asks? I did take a box down to the loading bench to weigh and sort them in an attempt at better accuracy. The majority fell between 51.3 and 51.7 with a few being slightly outside that range. Seemed to help eliminate fliers, which I assume were the 51.2's and 51.9's.

I've already started plotting on how I can throw some more money away on this one. Looking like some new rings, a better scope and maybe a new front rest are in order. I want to try one of the solid, adjustable rests. I use a Caldwell 2-piece set-up right now. They work good but still leave a lot up to me. Scope will probably be the Barksa Varmint or Varminter 4-16X50AO. Under $100 but the one I had on my Ruger served me well once I got it mounted in some decent rings. The BSA Contender looks appealing to though and it comes with a sunshade which, in my opinion, would make it look totally sweet!

All in all I'm extremely pleased with my purchase. It's heavy, well balanced, and shoots better than any other .22 I've owned. I've put around 200 rounds through it with no problems at all. Really has me kicking myself over that stupid 10/22 now. :banghead:
 
Last edited:
You're telling me. The 3 times I've taken it out, it's eaten a 50 round box without me looking!

Should have added this in the OP but I'll put it here:

The accu-trigger takes a little getting used to. In the short time I've been shooting it my trigger finger has found a sweet spot for the little blade in the trigger. If it's not right where it feels good I can't pull the trigger. It kind of irritated me at first that I kept stopping to adjust my finger ever so slightly, then I realized what that was doing: Creating consistency in my finger placement, which will lead to better shooting!

BUY ONE NOW!!!
 
whats that weigh? i have an older mkII with the pepper/black laminate and blue heavy barrel. it shoots really well but has been beat to hell from to much hunting. as cheap as these are im thinking about just getting a new one
 
Savage's web site puts the weight on these at 6.5 or 7 lbs. Mine feels good and heavy, solid. Comes with dual swivel studs up front too, for what it's worth. If yours doesn't have the accu-trigger, it's well worth the investment.
 
no its around ten years old; and no accutriger. they make a trigger sear for the old ones but they are around 90$ which doesnt make sense on a 300$ rifle.
 
I"d definitely get the newer one. The other 3 I had didn't have the accu-trigger and even with trigger work, they were no where close to the new one. I couldn't justify the price of the aftermarket trigger parts either.

If the thumbhole isn't your cup of tea, they also make a regular wood stock and synthetic with the heavy barrel, the sporter with a tapered barrel and no sights, and an assortment of field barrel rifles. Check out their website using the gunfinder feature. It lets you narrow down the results to only the Mark II series.

BTW< that pepper/black laminate stock sounds like a looker.
 
it was, but the wood is really soft and dented way to easy. it is covered in marks/dents while my regular wood stocked guns with similar usage look much better. i think they used some real soft wood hoping since it was a laminate it would work out.
 
You're telling me. The 3 times I've taken it out, it's eaten a 50 round box without me looking!

Should have added this in the OP but I'll put it here:

The accu-trigger takes a little getting used to. In the short time I've been shooting it my trigger finger has found a sweet spot for the little blade in the trigger. If it's not right where it feels good I can't pull the trigger. It kind of irritated me at first that I kept stopping to adjust my finger ever so slightly, then I realized what that was doing: Creating consistency in my finger placement, which will lead to better shooting!

BUY ONE NOW!!!
LOL. As I was reading your description of how you were adapting to the Accutrigger, I came to the exact same conclusion that you did: consistency. I wonder if the thumbhole stock might also lead to a more consistent hand-to-stock interface...

Imagine what this rig will do for you if you put a couple three thousand 22s through it, standing offhand! I'd bet by late July you could hit a 6" circle or gong 10/10. OK, well, 19/20 !
 
I remember reading an article about that rifle in Outdoor Life Magazine a couple of years ago. It was written by Jim Carmichael and he said it was it was very accurate. I may still have that issue and will look it up.
 
I just bought the same model at Dick's for the same price. I love the stock. Can't wait to shoot it. Glad to hear your's is working out well.
 
Great new gun

Hi all, new to the forum but couldn't resist chiming in since I just bought a new MKII BWTV-XP at Dicks this past weekend after seeing this thread. I have a Henry Lever .22 that I love but I caught the bug for a bolt action target shooter after somebody let me use their Marlin target gun. So I started looking around and heard the Savages had a good reputation for accuracy and were relatively inexpensive. My local Dicks had it on "clearance" and another sale on top of it, so how could I not leave with one? Add in the Scorecard Rewards as halfded said and you've got a fantastic deal. I was about to buy a used one at my local gunshop w/ the tricolor Jacaranda wood but this new one with the (I think) classier walnut laminated finish was the same price plus it had the scope.

Well I took it out to the range the next day w/ my two young kids as their intro to firearms. Sighted the scope in w/in 10 shots. The rifle was great for them because of the bolt action and easy trigger pull. Too heavy for anything other than bench rest for them but they had a blast.

I love the gun as well. It is definitely very accurate out of the box. The accutrigger is nice, I might like it a bit lighter so I'll have to see if it will adjust down anymore. I took it out again today and put another 100+ rounds of cheapo walmart winchester 36gr copper plated HP and was shooting several 7/16" to 8/16" 5-shot groups at 50 yards using a cardboard box for a makeshift rest. Plinking a plastic bottle at 100 yards with minimal holdover was no problem. (Oddly using this same ammo in my Ruger MKIII and Walther P22 causes numerous jams, both FTF and FTEs.)

I did have a problem at the end of my shooting session w/ the rifle: the factory 5 round magazine was pulling apart just a tiny bit at the top and all the rounds kept flying out when I pulled the bolt back to clear the spent round. Looked like the metal tab that holds the sides of the mag together had come loose. I ended up shooting single shot for the last bit because the mag wouldn't hold the rounds. I called Savage Arms this afternoon when I got home and they're sending me a replacement for free. Plus I ordered a 10 rounder from them (since I was getting free shipping).

So, a nice looking accurate rifle for a good price and good customer service plus cheap to shoot. A definite recommend.
 
Nice looking gun! I took the jump and got a Savage BTVSS and threw on a Leupold VX-III 6.5-20x50 last year. Here are a few pics.

http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/2391710214/photos/202794/scope

rifle


I uploaded them to my profile on a Photography website that I frequently visit.

Have you been able to shoot your rifle yet?
 
Last edited:
Look's like you got the big brother to my rifle! Mine is the Mark II .22lr. I've already put probably 300 rounds downrange with it. Damn thing eats at least a box of ammo every time I take it out, doesn't even bother asking me!

I've been having a good time shooting spinners at around 80 yards. I can hit the 4 inch one every time, the 3 inch most of the time, and the 1.5 inch most of the time without a stiff wind and some good concentration. I'm sighted in at 50 yards, so I'm holding over about 2 inches; makes things a little more difficult.

I plan on buying the .223 in the future and use my Mark II as a trainer. That's a sweet looking rifle you've got! I want a bipod for mine, but shoot off bags most of the time so I don't even have swivels installed right now.

BTW, I took a coil or two off my trigger spring to lighten the pull. The centerfire rifles allow a further drop in trigger weight though, so you shouldn't have to worry about that.

Range report is expected!

Here's my photog site. Haven't updated it in a while, but there's still some stuff to look at. I do a lot of stock photography, so some of the photos are kind of random.

http://rfphotography.dotphoto.com
 
I know this post is old, but I was looking at one of these same rifles. I'm not sure I want to take the plunge or not. How do you like it after having it for a while? Would you still recommend it? Others can feel free to chime in here too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top