Wow
They really need a new emoticon for this one, a spinnging head would do nicely. Some who read this apparently didn't get the point I was making. If you prefer a revolver over a Glock or a Marlin lever action over a semi-auto whatever, you are not a gun bigot, you are human with a preference. If, however, you run around denouncing a particular brand without substantive reason then you are a gun bigot. Part of the problem is that rumors and half truths spread like wild fire these day on the internet. Someone gets a bad Glock and everyone hears about it in a couple of days. I remember not too long ago that you couldn't read a post about Glock with hearing about a Glock blowing up. The trouble is that very few glocks blew up and, when they did, it was often from improperly reloaded ammo. Hell, I know a guy who blew up a Ruger Black Hawk. Does this mean that Rugers are weak? No it means that he screwed up royaly at the reloading bench though he swears he didn't. Sorry Ted.
Are there guns that I won't buy? Sure there are. There are guns after all that have earned their bad rep. But, if I don't have personal experience or at least extensive knowledge of a weapon I will not go out of my way to badmouth them. Even when I do have a bad experience with a gun I don't usually make a big deal out of it. It wasn't all that long ago that that I would not have considered buying a Kel-Tec but after all the good I have heard about them, I am absolutely considering it.
Apologist, you have got to be kidding me. An appologist is someone who makes excuses for his favorite brand in the face of overwhelming proof that it is defective or inferior to another. If you want to see appologists go on over the M1911forums and look at the posts under Kimber. It is amazing to me that these people accept the problems that they do. A lot of the posts over there are from guys who own them and are having problems with them. There are a lot of them! The appologists respond with " It needs a five hundred round break in" or send it to the factory and they will make it right. It turns out that most of the problems have to do with improperly tuned extractors. Well here it is. If you pay $1100 dollars for a gun and it doesn't work right out of the box then, THE FACTORY DIDN'T MAKE IT RIGHT IN THE FIRST PLACE.
If it truly needs a five hundred round break in period then again, THE FACTORY DIDN'T MAKE IT RIGHT THE FIRST TIME. Polishing mating surfaces, feed ramps etc. will aleviate the need for this. In case you haven't been paying attention lately 500 rounds of 45 ammo will cost you about $200.
I own a Kimber Tactical pro II and a Taurus PT1911. The Kimber wouldn't feed a mag full of ball ammo without choking on a couple of them when I got it. The Taurus has digested over 1900 rounds of everything I have fed it, flawlesly. I wanted to believe that the Kimber would in fact be more accurate. IT ISN'T. The Kimber cost almost twice what the Taurus did and, I like the looks of my duotone Taurus better than my Kimber. Someone is sure to come along and tell me I got a bad one, but it happens. Yeah, me and a whole lot of other guys. My 9 Savage rifles will outshoot most any production rifle out there including your beloved Remington. If I have to bet my life on a handgun that I have never fired before, you can bet your @ss it is gonna be a Glock. My two Olympic rifles are far more accurate than they ought to be for the price I paid and yet I let you guys bully me into thinking I need a Bushmaster, so I bought one. I also own two Ruger LCP's that work fine but, get this, I got people telling me that the Kel-Tec is better. Apparently it is a bad thing to acknowledge that you have a problem with a gun, recall it, and fix it free of charge. Het maybe Ruger could buy Kimber and teach them to make a gun that works out of the box and if it doesn't THEY COULD FIX THE PROBLEM SO IT DOESN'T KEEP HAPPENING.