griz
Member
This was in the local Hampton paper yesterday. The library had posted a sign saying "no weapons", but the law says they can not do that. So a citizen is trying to get the city moving by going armed in the library. This writer, Tamara Dietrich, thinks that is wrong, and interviewed a 12 year old to support her opinion.
Link to the article:
http://www.dailypress.com/news/columnists/dp-34574cm0sep24,0,2842145.column?coll=dp-news-columnists
Idea of taking guns into a library should be shot down fast
Published September 24 2006
It's officially no longer about defending the Second Amendment - it's about rubbing everybody else's nose in it.
That's the upshot as a Virginia gun group stakes out public libraries as the latest testing ground for the right to bear arms.
The state doesn't expressly forbid loaded guns from public libraries. In fact, the state expressly forbids municipalities from banning guns from places not covered by state statute.
But the state either gives gun fanatics too much credit for having the sense God gave a horse or, simply put, it sides with the fanatics.
"We're a nation of laws," Philip Van Cleave, president of the Virginia Citizens Defense League, said in Friday's Daily Press.
"You can't ignore laws. To do so is to act like any other criminal."
And this is the caliber of folks who defend the right to bring loaded firearms into our public libraries - zealots who insist you're either with 'em or you're a criminal.
Van Cleave and his posse can label me an extremist who wants to destroy all guns. Let me shoot that clay pigeon right now.
I grew up around firearms. They're useful, needful tools. Go ahead and buy one if you want. But people who grew up around guns - who are paranoia-free and aren't overcompensating for some shortcoming - don't feel compelled to carry them everywhere they go.
Gun advocates seem to need to be ever ready to kill somebody. That sounds like a good plan in Baghdad. But in libraries?
Even a 12-year-old boy browsing the stacks in Newport News was startled at the idea of fellow patrons being armed.
"This is a library," William Ferguson said in Friday's paper. "People come here to read. Why would they need a gun?"
Last I heard, nobody shoots up libraries. People feel safe there. My son frequents our local library and has never felt an iota of fear anywhere between the Artemis Fowl series and the manga comic books.
Van Cleave argues that having more guns around would make children even safer in case of emergency.
Ferguson's little brother, on the other hand, told reporter Seth Freedland that what he feared were men with guns "running around shooting each other and stealing stuff."
I'm with the kid brother.
The Newport News City Council was told last week by the gun group that the sign barring "weapons" - and by implication firearms - from the library violated state code.
The city attorney concedes that the group might be right. He's preparing a recommendation for the council on how to ban all deadly weapons from the library except firearms.
Last year, Del. Mayme BaCote, D-Newport News, introduced a bill at the request of the council that would have allowed municipalities to pass ordinances to ban firearms from public libraries.
House Bill 1785 died in the Militia, Police and Public Safety Committee.
"Evidently," BaCote told me Friday, "people were in favor of having guns in libraries."
Evidently.
BaCote might reintroduce the bill next session.
Del. Phil Hamilton, R-Newport News, said Friday that he could support such a bill - if it ever made it to the House floor.
"I'm not a gun owner, so my perspective is I don't understand why an individual ever needs to carry one (in a public library)," Hamilton said.
"However," he added, "it is part of our national Constitution, the right to bear arms."
Groups like the Citizen Defense League and the mighty National Rifle Association can wave the Second Amendment all they want, but I'd wager that even Thomas Jefferson would buck at their interpretation:
NRA: Mr. Jefferson! Mr. Jefferson! We must bear arms in our public libraries!
Jefferson: Why, Citizen? Are the British there?
NRA: Um, no.
Jefferson: Is it insurrection? An imminent attack by a foreign power?
NRA: No, not really. We just like to pack heat in public libraries.
Jefferson: What are you - nuts?
The Founding Fathers wrote the Second Amendment because they knew that a well-regulated militia - a citizens army - is essential to defend the country from attack. Not because they saw an armed kook lurking behind every tree or hiding out in the library stacks.
Although, at this rate, that's exactly where we're headed.
Tamara Dietrich can be reached at [email protected] or 247-7892.
Link to the article:
http://www.dailypress.com/news/columnists/dp-34574cm0sep24,0,2842145.column?coll=dp-news-columnists