Sgt. York relic threatened by NFA; will ATF show some wisdom?

Status
Not open for further replies.

hammer4nc

Member.
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Messages
977
Comments: Notice how police, congressman go to bat for the library in their dealings with the ATF. Would the same concern be offered to a common citizen in a similar circumstance? Or, would they be threatened with criminal charges plus a SWAT visit?

Lets follow this one and see if ATF can apply some intelligence to the situation. If not, we'll be amused by the standard claim: "its not their fault; they're just doing their yob". :evil:

My guess is the ATF will demand that the receiver be cut up (demilled), to avoid confiscation. Crufflers, what impact would this have on its historic value?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2007/04/24/a_historic_find_frustrates_nahant/


A historic find frustrates Nahant
WWI gun in attic is no boon, so far

By Matt Viser, Globe Staff | April 24, 2007

Sergeant Alvin York's against-all-odds capture of a heavily fortified German machine gun nest in the Argonne Forest of France 89 years ago made York an American legend.

With seven other American infantrymen, he took 132 German prisoners and silenced German machine guns that had slaughtered Allied troops. His actions earned the humble Tennessee farmer an iconic status alongside Daniel Boone and a title declaring him the greatest American hero of World War I. He was held up as the very embodiment of humility and courage.

Which is why officials at Nahant's public library were thrilled four years ago to discover what they say is one of the captured German machine guns in the library attic.

"I tripped over the gun one day, not knowing what it was," said Daniel deStefano, the library's director. "I picked up what I thought was a pipe. It was the barrel of the gun."

Library officials say they researched markings on the gun and searched local newspaper archives and town documents for answers about the weapon's origin, determining that the gun had been given to the town in 1918 by an Army clerk, Nahant native Mayland Lewis.

According to the research, Lewis had plucked the weapon from a pile given up by surrendering Germans and shipped it home. Briefly prized as a souvenir of the war, it was paraded through the town on Armistice Day in 1919 by Boy Scouts who towed it in a red wagon. But over the years it faded from public view.

Its rediscovery stoked dreams of a big windfall for the library, where officials had been pondering ways to finance an expansion of the cramped facility and an upgrade of an antiquated cataloging system. Library officials said they contacted several auctioneers in New England who estimated the weapon's value at $100,000 and perhaps several times more than that.

But the dreams didn't last long. Library officials soon learned that the gun is illegal and that they can do very little with it.

Federal gun laws prohibit possession or sale of automatic guns unless they are registered with the US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. In the library attic for years, the German machine gun was never registered. The library isn't allowed to register the gun now because federal law prohibits new registrations on automatic weapons, except in rare circumstances.

Since it is illegal for the library even to have the gun, Nahant police took it and stored it under lock and key in an evidence locker, forestalling seizure by the ATF.

"We cannot hold onto this weapon," deStefano said. "If we kept it on the premises, they were going to come and get it, and they were going to destroy it. This is a piece of history. We're kind of caught between a rock and a hard place."

The town has appealed to the ATF for permission to sell the gun, but so far, bureau officials have rejected the pleas.

A spokesman for the ATF said yesterday that it would be possible for the Nahant police to register the gun and take responsibility for it, which would prevent it from being destroyed. They could also possibly transfer it to another public agency, but it's unlikely that it can be sold on the market , according to Jim McNally, a spokesman in Boston for the ATF .

He said the agency -- at the request of US Representative John F. Tierney, a Salem Democrat -- is researching options that Nahant might be allowed under the law, such as transferring the gun to a private museum.

"There are pretty clear-cut laws when it comes to automatic weapons," McNally said yesterday. "This is a unique weapon, and it would be sad to see it destroyed. Whether it can raise money for what they're looking for is another matter."

In an effort last fall to get special permission to register the gun, town officials approached Tierney and Senators Edward M. Kennedy and John F. Kerry for legislation that would grant the town an exception to the restrictions. Neither Kerry nor Kennedy responded.

Tierney issued a statement yesterday calling the machine gun a "remarkable object" and said his office is engaged in discussions with the ATF.

The library's machine gun discovery was first reported Monday by The Daily Item in Lynn.

Richard Hallion, a military historian who has studied Hiram Maxim, a Maine native who built the first effective machine gun, said he knew of no other gun from the York battle. He believes that numerous museums might be interested in preserving this one.

But Chris Berg, who owns a company that specializes in historic military weapons, said that the library's gun is worth little because it is not registered.

"In all honesty," he said, "it's only worth $500." He said if it were registered and legal to sell, he would pay at least $50,000.
 
But Chris Berg, who owns a company that specializes in historic military weapons, said that the library's gun is worth little because it is not registered.

Huh??

"In all honesty," he said, "it's only worth $500." He said if it were registered and legal to sell, he would pay at least $50,000.

Which means it's actually worth around half a million, right? ;)
 
Actually it's worth up to 10 years and $100,000...

The library isn't allowed to register the gun now because federal law prohibits new registrations on automatic weapons, except in rare circumstances.

I'd really like to know what those rare circumstances are, since from what I've understood about NFA laws there aren't any. :scrutiny:
 
I'd really like to know what those rare circumstances are, since from what I've understood about NFA laws there aren't any.
Probably never, that's why it's "rare"... in as "rare as hen's teeth". See what El T comes up with
 
I seem to recall a process whereby it can be catalogued into a museum system run by the DOD. That museum system is mostly to keep track of whatever sundry historic firearms are owned by the various branches of the military, and on display at different posts and bases. I could be wrong, though. Wouldn't be the first time.
 
The rare circumstances are an amnesty, which can be called at will by (iirc) the US AG, or the Dir of BATFE, the chances of which happening approach zero.

Anyone wanna take bets that there will be an unplublished, 5 minute long amnesty window?
 
It could be dewatted, right? I mean, that destroys it as a functional weapon--and any value it might have, aside from historical--but then it could be retained by the library.

Or if the cops took it, could they not then disable it somehow and then let the library display it?


Anyway, I thought the comment by that Berg guy was interesting, and maybe not that inaccurate. After all, don't we complain that new, nontransferable MGs is relatively inexpensive, right? Cop shops and military units buy them all the time. This one is likely worth more than $500 on historical value along, but if it were transferable, MG collectors would be floating monster sums to lay hands on it.
 
The government is hell bent on preventing homeowners in many neighborhoods from renvating their own houses because of their historic value. Exchange 'house' with 'gun' and the government has a completely different tune.
Save the gun. Send it to the 82nd Airborne Museum at Fort Bragg. That was his unit and I bet that he would wish that they had it back.
 
Easiest solution:

Pass a bill that allows this particular gun to be registered.
 
Well this gun needs to be protected ASAP.

Just pass a friggin bill.


US Representative John F. Tierney

You want this piece of firearms history saved?
 
President Bush, by Executive Order, could provide for any level of legalization desired by the museum. Demilled without destroying the appearance, or even registration. From the museum's standpoint, since they're not interested in a high value (insurance premiums) or in firing it, demill would be preferable.

Art
 
Most efficient way to save it is for the BATFE to accept it as a donation to their museum. While that takes it out of the public view (this massive museum is only for BATFE use), the gun would at least survive intact. Someday that museum will be opened. Someday.

Anything else is most likely unrealistic hope which will be preceded by destruction.
 
Demill? Why?

Are the librarians going to be firing it in the bookstacks? What reasonable argument could be made to alter this historical relic in ANY way. It it magical? Is it possessed?

Federal Gun laws are completely fubar. They should be abolished or revised downwards drastically.

Bush ought to step in. While he is at it he should write a law to legalize his own illegally imported hipower Browning that he keeps in the oval office. The one that used to belong to Saddam. If Bush can ignore Federal Gun and import law, so should a few librarians.

This is nonsense, codified into Federal Law. It brings the Federal Government into non-compliance with the Constitution and makes it the focus of derision and contempt. It ought to be ended and the folks who enabled it punished.
 
Oh well, as we have seen many times, stupid gun control laws have unintended consequences.

Yes, it sucks that this historical weapon might end up in the jaws of Captain Crunch, but why should it be treated any differently from the thousands of bring back FA weapons that might still be hiding in attics throughout the land? In other words, why would this one get a pass and not the others that are historically significant simply because they were captured by GIs who are not as well known as Sgt. York?

Open the registry, or better yet, do away with it all together.
 
Unfortunately, the answer to the lead in question will probably turn out to be: Not Bloody Likely, which given their past, checkered enforcement record, and their seemingly undaunted ability Not To Learn From History, strikes one as terribly sad.
 
Selling it on the open market where it would realize maximum value? Not much hope. However I'm sure there are legal ways to get it into a museum as I been to museums displaying modern FA's that didn't even exist at the time the Federal Register was closed (1986?) so there is no way they could be on it.
Somebody should check with the Kentucky Military History Museum in Frankfort, I'm sure they would be interested. Or the National Firearms Museum....or Smithsonian. ????
Surely one or two would like to have it. And museums do have budgets to acquire new items.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top