Jim Watson
Member
And I didn't even notice the rear sight, it looked right this way. Ill tap it out, thanks!
I've seen sights that got turned around on purpose. I think as the owner got presbyoptic.
And I didn't even notice the rear sight, it looked right this way. Ill tap it out, thanks!
I've seen sights that got turned around on purpose. I think as the owner got presbyoptic.
Yes sir, I did.Yep I have seen that fix recommended before. But Mn Fats said he was going to turn the sight around and I bet he did.
"Another early reference appears in a list of goods taken west by French Canadian trader and fur trapper Etienne Provost in 1829: “2 rifles, Hawkins ($25.00 each).” Those are just two examples (both notations appear in the book Supply and Demand: The Ledgers and Gear of the Western Fur Trade by Olsen and McCloskey). Other rifles were not generally named to this level of detail, but Hawken rifles (and some pistols) always seem to be mentioned by name. In other words, if it wasn’t a Hawken, it was just another rifle".
"For comparison, the price of a “trade rifle” (a rifle made for the fur trade, to be sold or traded to trappers, red or white) as made by Henry, Leman, Tryon or others could be purchased for around $12. At more than twice that amount, Hawken rifles were truly expensive guns".
In the link I posted in the first post Leman rifles were shown to be priced around $7-8 not $12 like in quote above. Back then $4 was a lot of money.
Using an online inflation calculator a $25 Hawken in 2018 would cost $808.00 and an $8.00 Trade Rifle would cost $258.00. Whats funny is that these prices are sort of in line with what a good Hawken copy and a Traditions Hawken or similar rifle cost today. The cheaper guns are just as servicable and chosen based on the affordable price. Just like the choices shooters made way back then when buying a rifle.
As per Solomon, nothing new under the sun, right?