China products have been a main staple of the US economy for many years. The US economy would fall apart without them. They fund the US Iraq War.
I'm no expert on the matter and, as noted previously, I reside in a glass house. However, we seem to be missing something of import that Dave mentioned:
China's a subcontinent holding 1 of 4 humans now alive. Lots of enterprises there that have nothing to do with the govt.
Norinco's owned and operated by the Chinese military, the muscles behind the human rights violations, the oppression and the evils done in Tibet and elsewhere.
RBernie has noted something similar.
I take that to mean that there's Chinese manufactured stuff completely distinct from military or government subsidized Chinese manufactured stuff. If I'm correct this would not be a subtle distinction.
The toys or other household goods you buy from Chinese suppliers are not owned and / or subsidized by the Chinese military.
Assuming this
source to be authoritative, and I have no knowledge if that's the case, it would seem there are "two Chinas".
This trend is an outgrowth of Mao-era doctrines of "People’s War" which sought to create multiple redundant factories to ensure weapons production even after the capture of Chinese territory. But instead of rationalizing its defense sector, since the PLA reforms of 1998, China has promoted and subsidized increasing competition among its weapons design and manufacturing concerns, with a resulting surplus of systems.
This would lead me to believe that some Chinese products are competing "fairly" (whatever that means) while some are subsidized by government policy.
I can see where some folks would feel a bit of disquiet knowing their shotgun came from an overseas equivalent of Raytheon or GE.
Also, the poster that linked to "military shotgun" photo from the website of our friend Max P. probably didn't notice the double shot of irony on the page containing the photo.
This one:
http://world.guns.ru/shotgun/sh38-e.htm
It seems the Hawk 97-1 is actually marketed as an "anti riot gun". This may have special significance for those of us that remember the events of
1989. I expect there are a number of folks on these fora that were still in diapers in 1989 and wouldn't see irony in purchasing a Tiananmen Square Commemorative Anti-Riot shotgun as it were.
I still intend to stay clear of the politics, apart from posting what I found recently above, but I have a better appreciation for those that do see issues. It would appear there are indeed "two Chinas" as far as products go and the Norinco is firmly on the government / military subsidized side. That says nothing about an ability to mass produce a product competitively and much about being part of a system that has little constraints regarding the need to show a profit - quite unlike the product I'm familiar with that must stand on its own two feet profit-wise and actually lives at the upper end of its scale - it pretty much has to given the freight and other import costs.
I'm feeling rather of a subtle shift in my attitude though it remains, at this time, largely uninformed. But I didn't want a Norc anyway so no harm done, I suppose. If it's indeed subsidized I have no respect for their price point. I'm not prepared to state such as fact given two hours of old guy internet research - I'll cheerfully listen to anyone that has better information. At this point, it looks like what we used to call "dumping".