Overall Joe I think without the light works better - I guess in a sense - one can imagine it switched on - seeing as it's there!
I have reshot my 22/45 to get up to date - just fitted a new Volquartsen comp' to it. Whether that'll improve my pin shooting remains very much to be seen LOL
Joe - thank you Sir for the kind comment. I only wish I didn't have to squish pics down so much to post - because there are some inevitable losses. Don Hart of course is ''Da Man'' and has his work well nailed, as no doubt you have seen.
Every time I make a new shot and use it - I look at it again and want to re-shoot - always something bugs me!
Clipse - NICE! #2 in particular benefits nicely from the colored light and the close up #5 - also most pleasing. Only suggestion I'd make is, to further enhance - find a way of having the gun propped up somehow - such that background is not just a flat plain..... but more like a horizontal and vertical component. then you'll get a bit more variety in lighting on background itself - which can complement the piece even more.
Actually Joe - considering flash - those have really ''held'' quite well. All too often the flash focus produces a near burned out highlight. That first pic could probably be balanced out a bit by judicious work in an image program ... pulling back the brightest area a bit and evening things out.
I don't know if you can set up your white balance manually, or not - but if you can then consider two or three tungsten sources - above a white sheet as a diffuser ... and play with positions.
The background here is IMO a tad too ''agressive'' - tho as you have seen I do like a red type of background. Try and get some more muted red tones - or other colors you may like - I bought several 2 yard lengths of fabric from WalMart originally - and found fleece easier to use than some things - simply because no weave pattern to show. It does tho collect lint like no other!!
Of course on occasions a background pattern can even be complementary - instance denim.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Joe - indulge me - I am meddling again!
I have played with that pic - albeit real quick. I have tried to balance the lighting a wee bit and also - altered the type of red - made it (IMO) less agressive - de-saturated a bit too. Not saying this is in any way definitive - far from it - but just another ''version'' from ol' meddlin' P95
Thanks again for the comments. I do appreciate them!
I "stole" the idea of a red background from you. Mine is a tennis shirt, and was the only red I had. I'm going to try something else now, a little more muted, and see how that comes out...
Indeed, stainless can be a real bummer to get - always tend to be highlights that try to burn out whilst other areas want to stay too dark!
Here - and hardly your fault - the classic flash ''hot spot'' - so hard to avoid. One way to reduce this can be to take the pic with a layer or two of Kleenex over the flash window - diffuse the light a bit more. Also - if flash is at all moveable (probably not I suspect) - then aim it at other than subject matter and try to use white card to bounce it.
Do try some other light sources if possible - depending on how much control you have on white balance. If you have enough scope in an image application, it can be corrected afterwards to a degree.
Whatever - experiment is always a good way to go - keep trying various things until you find you can settle on something that works for you. All part of the fun
Haha - OK, another tennis shirt! Nice blue tho Joe - not as ''aggessive'' as the red LOL!
Lighting has worked quite well here - appears to be sourced from high right. Do tho when chance allows, play with multiple sources - which would give a more ''casual'' set of shadows - one light source giving some fill on shadows from other sources etc.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.