Has the AWB fight been more satisfying than the result to you?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Boats

member
Joined
Dec 29, 2002
Messages
3,705
Location
Oregon
I was thinking myself a strange case as August begins the countdown to the death of the AWB. I am increasingly ambivalent about actually buying anything covered by the AWB.

It is easily researched here that I fought for the death of that excremental legislation as much as any non-professional. The nail-biting and phone calls to DC back in March were intense, and the vigil is maintained even today. However, I inevitably found myself drawing up the obligatory "wish list" for September 14, 2004. I came up with a few things, but then, as they are prone to do, a major appliance broke, necessitating a revisitation of my desires for an AK, and AR, and a wondernine as a refrigerator bit into the minor fortune I had begun amassing for THE DAY. One had to go. I surprised myself however.

Upon revisitation I decided I didn't actually want any of the listed things. The AWB came about when I had pretty much self-mended out of my Iwannacoolgun viral infection. My list now looks like this: Get a snubbie .357 and a lever gun--get better sights on both.

The AWB has seemingly done nothing to me. Yeah its blasphemy, but I wasn't interested anymore back in 1994 about buying the things covered by the AWB until I had antis telling me I couldn't have them. Don't get me wrong, I hated the concept of the AWB and helped fight it on the front end, but I also knew it wasn't really going to put me out since my tastes had evolved from where they were in my early 20s. Now that it looks like the antis can't tell me what semi-autos I can or can't own anymore (next target the 89 EO) I don't care if I actually own any, only that I have the option.

The ridiculousness of using Klinton mags or not having folding stocks and other accessories only motivated me to get even more into the "low caps" I had already begun collecting by 1994. I now have low-cap 1911s, shotguns, revolvers, and rifles. With the Government Model, an Ithaca, a Garand, and a GP-100, various bolt rifles, and others, I have over the years transformed myself from someone who liked to spray around and just make noise as often as actually hit anything to, dare I say, a disciplined shooter who is a pretty decent shot at reasonable distances. I have become a .45ACP and .357 Mag junkie. When one only has 5, 6, 7, 8, or 10 rounds on tap before the reload, it tends to concentrate the mind. I also liked getting away from paying as much for spare mags as I had in a handgun, or using recycled GI or military contract garbage on rifles.

I now find that I don't want to go back, even if the mags are brand spanking new. I guess I won't be buying any post-post ban toys after all just because they suddenly are available again. I am through with that phase of my life. I am buying what I have come to love, what I am accurate with, and what intrigues me. I am no longer "into" something that is high (normal) capacity just because I helped win a long fight with the antis. The journey was more rewarding than the destination for me. Was it for anyone else?

PS: I will still fight the antis, but the rest of you all can prop up the metric end of the market.
 
The result is a restoration of some of our rights. That's huge, whether you intend to use those rights or not.

That said, I'd like a FAL with a flash hider, bayonette, folding stock, and a grenade launcher (just because they say it's bad) once the ban expires.
 
The restoration of rights and the death of a useless law makes me happy. I didn't really start enjoying firearms until after 2000, so I've never known "pre-ban" life. I'm pretty happy with my 20" HBAR AR-15, sks and 10 round handguns (ok, I did buy a 15 round mag for my 9mm Ruger).

I agree about limiting your rounds at the range too. After I shoot 10 rounds I need a rest anyway. But you can bet my HD gun has the 15 round mag in it, plus one chambered.

Now I might be interested in a tele stock for my AR, and a few new 20 round mags for it (MD law still restricts mag size to 20), but I'm certainly not salivating to get new goodies. Yet. Maybe when my choices are not as limited, I'll see a bright light and pump up the economy with some big
post-post ban goodies.

Yes, the fight has been a good one. I've learned a lot about politics and legislative procedures. And our cause is a just cause. Obliviating ANY law the encroaches on law abiding citizens' freedoms needs to be fought against.



The death of this law won't bring rainclouds full of blood. So sorry to disappoint you, Ms. Feinstein.
 
awcountdown.gif
 
Some of us fought for the neat new toys, and som couldn't care less,personally, but we all fought on principle, which is good. One down, 4 (?) more to go.

..and the harder they come
the harder they fall,
one and all.
 
I'm not a rifleman. Never have been. Never will be. The leftist extremist so-called "assault weapons" ban doesn't directly affect me—except that it established the legal principle that some guns are cosmetically too dangerous for commoners to be allowed to own.

That principle could easily be abused to disarm us all.
 
Any right "regained" is a good thing, but I somewhat agree with your view of the issue.

I don't have any big post-ban plans, but reasonably priced standard capacity mags for the pistols will be appreciated. The ability to dress my collection of "military style" rifles in authentic service garb will be cool, but more from a sentimental perspective than from a practical one. Probably the biggest benefit to me will be the ability to put real telescoping stocks on my ARs... see, I'm somewhat vertically-challenged, and most rifles' standard length of pull is a tad long for me. I've currently got a beat-up A1 stock on my Bushmaster carbine... gets me 5/8" closer to a good fit than the A2 stock does. But a better solution will be a telescoping stock a click or two from fully extended.

Bottom line - the anti's strategy is to take away all of our Second Ammendment rights, a piece at a time. Getting back any of those pieces - no matter how small - represents a step in the right direction... and a victory for those who believe the Constitution actually means what it says.
 
I wouldn't mind adding a collapsable stock and real flash hider on my M4.

Greg
 
On August 27, 1776: Battle of Long Island (Brooklyn, NY) sees 30,000 British troops chase 11,000 Americans off Long Island. The subsequent follow-up at Harlem Heights sees Washington tossed out of NY and chased across NJ.

British troops occupied New York for the next seven years.

November 25, 1783: Evacuation Day -- the last British troops in the 13 United States evacuate New York City, carrying thousands of Loyalists with them. The city is liberated the same day by the Continental Army under General George Washington.

Getting something back that was unjustly lost is good thing.
 
To be honest when the AWB was enacted I disliked having the government tell me what I could and couldn't buy as much as the next person, but my wants weren't on the list. I'll be glad when it's gone, but my purchasing choices weren't hampered by the ban.
 
I'm waiting with baited breath for the day I can swap out the front sight bases on my ARs for ones with bayonet lugs and thread the barrels for the A2 compensator. Not because I need them, but because I want them.

I'm also waiting for the day I can buy >10 round mags for my Sig228 without having to direct deposit my paycheck into someone's PayPal account.

Some new 20 and 30 rounds for my ARs would be nice, my current stash could best be described as in poor/fair condition.

A folding stock Uzi and telestock-equipped M4 will both be in the near future, but with that said, my next purchase is most likely going to be a 700VS with all the trimmings, as I currently do not have a modern bolt rifle.

Its all about priorities, and different strokes for different folks.

Kharn
 
Getting something back that was unjustly lost is good thing.

That is the biggest thing for me - I utterly RESENT the guberment thinking that it has the legal right under the Constitution to use its overwhelming power to limit our (Constitution-pre-dating) rights.

Pissing off/scaring the crap out of the antis is another big plus.

Having a federal firearms law go away is a great principle, and will be a great tool in the future to help get other such laws repealed (because none of the others will sunset) when there (hopefully) isn't a massacre of some kind.

Buying LOTS of normal capacity magazines is also very important for me - I didn't have enough in '94 (esp. for the guns I didn't yet have :D ), and I'll not be caught flat-footed again.
 
Maybe a Beretta 92 and maybe an STI 2011 but neither are particularly likely.

I'm saving up for a Silver Hawk SxS - They did, after all, name if after me - seems the least I can do.

The nine years of writing elected reps, writing checks to NRA and GOA was because I really, really, REALLY believe in slippery slopes, camel's noses and the intrinsic "wrongness" of the '94 act and all of its cousins.
 
ya know what would be sweet?

if a manufacturer like Quality Parts / Bushmaster had a victory sale September 14th

Buy a "preban" configured upper for 25 dollars off and get a free A2 flash hider

Heck, we should set up a website of just pictures of children shooting fully featured ARs
(those collapsing stocks are great for teaching the kiddos!)

The NRA should "mint" a junior patriot medal to be given to kids that can recite the 4 rules and successfully erase the center of a special 25 yard target with 30 rounds in 5 minutes.

i can see a print campaign of grampa, dad and grandson
Triangle HGed A1, an SPR, and a shorty 22lr M4gery
We are an American AR15 Family.
These rifles are a part of our history.
And the low kick .223 round is fun for Mom to shoot too!

Oh, the howls that will eminate from 1225 Eye Street NW
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top