Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Heller and the ACLU?

Discussion in 'Activism Discussion and Planning' started by mljdeckard, Oct 26, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. mljdeckard

    mljdeckard Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2006
    Messages:
    12,665
    Location:
    In a part of Utah that resembles Tattooine.
    Where before, the ACLU could dodge defending the Second Amendment under the rationale, "Whether or not the right to keep and bear arms is an individual right is in dispute, therefore we will not choose to actively defend it.", but now, since it has been ruled as an individual right, should the ACLU not be setting up a dedicated section for issues relating to the RKBA?

    Should some of us who are more professionally qualified than myself knock on their door and volunteer to lead this new section? I'm not sure whether I'm being facetious or not. What is their rationale to ignore the RKBA NOW?
     
  2. cbrgator

    cbrgator Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    2,525
    Their rationale? Because.

    Honestly, they'll probably just call the decision too controversial which will allow them to continue their stance.
    Their rationale? Because.


    A pro-gun ACLU??? Can't have that now can we... :rolleyes:
     
  3. au1776

    au1776 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    82
    The ACLU has always been an ideologically-driven entity. Plus,
    considerable opposition arguing for property rights/gun rights/economic autonomy has pushed them further left (WLF, PLF, MSLF, SLF, etc, etc.).
     
  4. docmagnum357

    docmagnum357 Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    Messages:
    60
    Location:
    western north carolina
    A guy at the gun club recently wrote them a letter, basically saying that he had dropped his membership years ago on account of their second ammendment stance, but that now that the second ammendment was clearly defined he fully expected them to start supporting the 2nd as an individual right,and here was his membership dues. He didn't hear back from them, but they kept the twenty. Go figure.
     
  5. cbrgator

    cbrgator Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    2,525
    What did he think was going to happen?
     
  6. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    47,607
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    Folks,

    Turn this back to an activism type discussion or it's turned off. Bitching and whining isn't allowed in Activism or Activism Discussion. Either come up with something constructive or stay out of it.
     
  7. Eightball

    Eightball Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2005
    Messages:
    4,257
    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    Here's a question.....could one sue the ACLU to get them to change their official stance to comply with the law of the land, and thus get them on our side?

    Or, at the very least, rather than complain about the ACLU, people could start writing ACLU's headquarters to say that if they switched their stance and started supporting the 2nd, that more of the general populace would probably join--heck, I would consider biting that bullet, for the sake of it.
     
  8. cbrgator

    cbrgator Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    2,525
    The ACLU supporting RKBA would cost them membership not increase it. They cater to a very liberal group of people who would be very unhappy with these changes and I bet a lot of their base would leave them. While they may pick up new members, I don't think they want to alienate existing ones.
    If they all of a sudden decided to fight for RKBA, hell I'd support em. But for every me, there is probably two liberals who will leave.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page