Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Help: need source for law on shooting photo of president

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Monkeyleg, Jul 1, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Monkeyleg

    Monkeyleg Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    5,058
    Location:
    Decatur, AL
    Over on another forum, I made the comment that it is illegal to shoot at a target bearing the resemblance of the president. I also recall that such laws apply to photos of senators, etc.

    This is what I've been told for years. Am I wrong? If not, does anyone have any idea where to find a credible source citing the law?

    Also, I know that in MA it's illegal to shoot at a target that resembles a human being. Months back, I was told that it's also illegal to do so here in WI. I'm still combing through state statutes on that one.

    If anyone has a lead, I'd really appreciate it.
     
  2. bouis

    bouis member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2006
    Messages:
    369
    I wouldn't be so quick to believe everything you hear. It might be marginally useful evidence supporting another charge (conspiracy or the like) but I can't see it being a crime in itself.

    If such a law existed it might not be constitutinal -- just argue that you're "expressing" yourself under the first amendment. It would be a fun case to argue at any rate.
     
  3. bouis

    bouis member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2006
    Messages:
    369
  4. Old Fuff

    Old Fuff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    23,908
    Location:
    Arizona
    Concerning the issue of shooting at an image (target or whatever) of the President, I would check with the U.S. Secret Service, who are charged with the responsibility of protecting the President, and some other government officials - past and present.
     
  5. ceetee

    ceetee Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2003
    Messages:
    1,998


    BUt make the call from a pay phone twenty or thirty miles from your house. While wearing gloves. And a big, floppy hat...:evil:
     
  6. Snake Eyes

    Snake Eyes Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2003
    Messages:
    764
    Location:
    Spokane, WA
    Old Fuff,

    Wow! I really have a lot of respect for your opinions and advice, but I think this one might be a little off the mark.

    How do you think the Secret Service might respond to such an inquiry? I bet it would involve a nice visit from some men in suits and sunglasses.:what:
     
  7. JohnBT

    JohnBT Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    13,233
    Location:
    Richmond, Virginia
    You can't shoot a picture? I've never heard that.

    John
     
  8. GregGry

    GregGry Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2005
    Messages:
    994
    Location:
    Milwaukee, Wi
    I have yet to see anything saying thats illegal, and I have read anything and everything law wise thats related to firearms.
     
  9. Old Fuff

    Old Fuff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    23,908
    Location:
    Arizona
    Snake Eyes:

    Given Monkeyleg's reputation within Wisconsin political circles I doubt they'd push any panic bottons.:cool:

    What they'd more likely do is have somebody in Public Relations answer his question. I suspect that shooting up an image of the President might be considered an implied threat against Mr. Bush, but like Monkeyleg I'm not sure, and I wouldn't hesitate to ask. I've had visits from those "men in suits and sunglasses," before and even done some work for them on one occasion. ;)

    But I don't think that our fellow member has any intention of doing that. (Shooting up "Bush targets.") He's simply asking about what the legal aspects are.
     
  10. Monkeyleg

    Monkeyleg Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    5,058
    Location:
    Decatur, AL
    Old Fuff, thanks for coming to my defense.

    I have no intention of shooting at photos of GW, Hillary, or any other powerful US political figure.

    It's just always been my understanding that doing so is illegal.

    Maybe doing so is not explicitly illegal, but borders on the powers of the Secret Service to investigate threats against the president, an ex-president, or an ex-First Lady.

    All I'm trying to do is settle an argument between some folks over on another forum, and me. I maintain that using a photo of GW or Hillary is, if not illegal, then certainly an invitation to an investigation.

    As for human silhouette targets in WI? I was told by someone whose depth of knowledge I respect that doing so is technically against the law. I know from doing searches on MA law that such targets are illegal.

    Any further clarification is much appreciated.
     
  11. sacp81170a

    sacp81170a Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2004
    Messages:
    2,410
    Location:
    Farmington, AR
    So I guess that in MA this means no IDPA matches? What if I put up a human silhouette and shoot it with arrows or throw rocks at it? Am I still guilty of a crime under MA law? :banghead: :barf:
     
  12. usmarine0352_2005

    usmarine0352_2005 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2005
    Messages:
    2,797
    I would do it with a picture of the President and when the Secret Service comes up and asks what your doing say:

    "What do you think?"

    Then see what happens. (This is a joke.)

    :neener:
     
  13. XavierBreath

    XavierBreath Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    5,054
    Location:
    Louisiana
    So can he be burned in effigy? Can you make a little doll and stick pins in it? What about an inflatable punching bag?

    I honestly don't know the answer, although I too, have heard somewhere, at some time that shooting photos can raise suspicions at the very least. Enquiring minds want to know........
     
  14. gc70

    gc70 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Messages:
    2,991
    Location:
    North Carolina
    <not serious>

    Do you think it would matter if the target was of a politician's backside rather than face?

    </not serious>
     
  15. Low-Sci

    Low-Sci Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Messages:
    505
    Location:
    Madison, Wisconsin
    I've never heard that its illegal to do that in Wi, but it is an interesting question. I also never even thought about silhouette shooting as something that could possibly be against the law.

    Especially since my little brother and myself sighted in his Mini-14 in on a caricature of Kofi Anan.
     
  16. geekWithA.45

    geekWithA.45 Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    9,051
    Location:
    SouthEast PA
    The idiotic MA law about "human form targets" aside, AFAIK, there's nothing illegal _per_se about shooting pictures of anyone.

    But then, be warned that context is everything. What I'd heard is that mailing pix of the shot up target to the target gets interpreted as a death threat, and investigated accordingly.

    It seems that if you wish to send a message, words work better.
     
  17. Monkeyleg

    Monkeyleg Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    5,058
    Location:
    Decatur, AL
    Well, Old Fuff, let's hope the Secret Service folks are as benign as you say they are. I just sent an email to their public service office to ask if they could shed any light on the question.

    If you don't see any further posts from me, you'll know they're not as benign as you thought. ;)
     
  18. Cosmoline

    Cosmoline Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    23,648
    Location:
    Los Anchorage
    I believe the answer is, it *CAN* be illegal. If it's done as part of a threat, and the photos are sent to the white house, then the line is crossed. But if it's done as a protest I think the First would offer some protection. I'm not going to be the one on that test case though :D
     
  19. Art Eatman

    Art Eatman Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    43,265
    Location:
    Terlingua, TX; Thomasville,GA
    The link goes to a SCOTUS decision, right? In that decision, SCOTUS sez you can shoot at any picture you want, per the First Amendment.

    Remember the furor when Liddy ran his mouth during his radio show about how much better he felt after a range session with Clinton targets? Bad taste is not prohibited by the Constitution. :D

    Art
     
  20. Old Fuff

    Old Fuff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    23,908
    Location:
    Arizona
    Don't worry Dick, I'll send you a cake with a saw in it... :evil: :D
     
  21. armoredman

    armoredman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2003
    Messages:
    16,429
    Location:
    proud to be in AZ
    MA can censor what TARGETS you can use? Good grief, that is NUTS. They would go crazy inside 20 seconds at any AZ shooting range.
     
  22. dev_null

    dev_null Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,338
    Location:
    Austin TX
    And the difference would be...? :evil:
     
  23. Thin Black Line

    Thin Black Line Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Messages:
    3,213
    Location:
    Amerikan Twilight Zone
    How would the Secret Service feel if there was a shooting competition
    where the "photos" were printed engravings of dead presidents on US
    currency where the shooter won the bills he put holes through at long
    range?

    Would this be wrong for an implied threat to a president (though already
    dead) and the wanton destruction of private property (federal reserve
    notes)?
     
  24. joab

    joab Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    4,830
    Location:
    Ocoee, Fla
    A study was done awhile ago that showed that soldiers who were trained to shoot at human images were much much more likely to engage actual human targets that those trained to shoot using bullseye targets.

    I read about this study in an article that was defending the banning of using human image targets so I assume that that is the logic used in MA as well
     
  25. Thin Black Line

    Thin Black Line Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Messages:
    3,213
    Location:
    Amerikan Twilight Zone
    Joab, I have heard of this well. Believe it to be true. I was part of a study
    group using specific concentration techniques that improved our shooting
    skills while I was in college many years ago. Despite doing this for a number
    of weeks and the promise that the results would be shared with us, the
    researcher never did send us a final copy of the report. I thinked it worked
    quite well, though :cool:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page