High-end .22LR rifles

Status
Not open for further replies.
The weatherby a few posts up reminded my of my dads weatherby Mk XXII. I don't have a picture of it but it looks just like this with the maple stock. He owned it since before I was born and he never shot it that I know of until I was about 20 when he got into prairie dogging. Nowdays he enjoys shooting his Magnum Research and Volquartzen custom 10-22's, so I don't think its been out in awhile.

Weatherby-Mark-XXII-2-01-ebuxoa7xnn_v_1509462247.jpg
 
Autoloading .22's that might be considered "high end" included the European Browning and Weatherby autos, and from America the sweet little Winchester 63 and the Browning patent Remington, plus one or two other Pre-WWII models I've forgotten. But among recent US .22 made auto loaders only the Thompson-Center 22 Classic comes close to qualifying. The sculpted all-steel receiver and stylish walnut stock put it it in a class by itself, plus the fact that the flat-bottomed receiver beds in the stock like a high powered rifle. Meaning it had an accuracy edge right out of the box. But alas, if ever a .22 was too good for the marked, this was it, and they were made only a few years. Attached photos include the bedding surfaces that make this rifle so remarkable... DSC_0022.JPG DSC_0024.JPG DSC_0036.JPG DSC_0026.JPG
 
Last edited:
Here are more views of the Thompson-Center 22 Classic autoloader. The fore and aft action screws anchor the receiver in the stock like a Centerfire rifle..It was expensive to build, which was probably the cause of its early demise... DSC_0048.JPG DSC_0051.JPG DSC_0052.JPG
 
Last edited:
Well I've gotten my 4th rifle, and as promised here is a picture of her. H&R M12 with a custom mount, reworked trigger, and it's temporary scope... also was trying to find what ammo she likes. Over the past 2 evenings I have been shooting it off a rolled up jacket on a picnic table @ 50yds and have found 2 promising rounds... wolf extra match and fiocchi biathlon super match. I fired 10 rounds of the wolf and 15 of the fiocchi... I'm sure I pulled 3 of the fiocchi shots. The far left is the 1st shot, 2 lower and 1 right (pulled from freezing). And alas the are 11 In the biggest hole... alot of potential there. I have a Bausch and Lomb 6-24x scope on its way as well as a harris rail adapter to put a bipod on this old girl... also have a variety more ammo in the mail for further testing... i was worried the trigger would be bad like ive read, but its very light and crisp. Has obviousy had work done on it.
 

Attachments

  • 20180104_165123.jpg
    20180104_165123.jpg
    114.5 KB · Views: 22
  • 20180104_165144.jpg
    20180104_165144.jpg
    66.7 KB · Views: 21
  • 20180104_165151.jpg
    20180104_165151.jpg
    59.1 KB · Views: 19
Last edited:
Last edited:
The problem with Wolf is there seems to be a flyer or two in every box...Plenty enough to ruin a 25 bull target.
 
I have never seen a box of Wolf match ammo in the flesh. Is it still around, or are you guys shooting up your stash?
 
I have a stash....and really don't want anymore. It's way better than bulk, but not near as good as some of the other offerings that on cost a bit more.
 
Leroy Barry of Canyon Creek Stocks located in Darby, Montana made the stock. He used to be the chief stock maker at Cooper, I believe. Seems like a great guy and is very easy to work with. His wife, Connie, did the absolutely stunning checkering on the stock.
 
Last edited:
Leroy Barry of Canyon Creek Stocks located in Derby, Montana made the stock. He used to be the chief stock maker at Cooper, I believe. Seems like a great guy and is very easy to work with. His wife, Connie, did the absolutely stunning checkering on the stock.
Gotcha. I've seen pics of Leroy and Connie's work on RFC. He is one of the best in the business.
 
If I sort my gun spreadsheet on 22s from cheapest $25 to most expensive $1700 and then look for the guns that have brought me pleasure...

The ones I enjoy are between $157 and $450:
Win 61 $450
Rem 550-1 $157
Rem 572 $180

I am just too good for the pieces of junk and just not good enough for the safe queens.
 
I have a stash....and really don't want anymore. It's way better than bulk, but not near as good as some of the other offerings that on cost a bit more.
At one time, I tried about everything I could find. Price was not an issue. Some of the very expensive (Lapua, SK, or Eley, I disremember) was consistently worse than Federal Automatch.

If there's something more accurate than Wolf Match, I'd like to find it. I know every rifle is a creature unto itself, but experimentation is always interesting
 
Eley Match and Tenex, Lapua Center X and Midas, and Federal Ultra Match are all far superior ammo compared to Wolf Match. That list is not inclusive. There are many others.
 
I'll go along with the above--Eley Tenex (red box) and Match (black box), and Federal Ultra Match work best for me. Haven't tried the Lapua, or the high-end RWS.
 
I've never heard of this rifle before. Is it the same as the R55? The bedding does appear to be well designed and thought out. How does it shoot?

All of those Thompson/Center semi-auto .22s are good. The R55 Benchmark is a later version with a target barrel and no iron sights, but the same free-float barrel which attaches directly to the receiver. They are the same family of rifle but the R55 is more desirable in my opinion.
They are very accurate, despite the fact that the recoil spring and its mount are attached forward of the action, directly to the underside of the barrel!
 
Really, really enjoying this thread. I posted my pride and joy custom-stocked Anschutz 1710 in post #79. I have been playing with better-than-average bolt guns for decades, but for economic reasons have usually one possessed only one to three at a time. During the past few decades I have worked my way through a Dakota .22, three Kimbers (all lemons, but I keep trying!), a Winchester 52B, two Sakos Finnfires (still have one), an early Cooper, a Remington 541S, a Springfield 1922 M2 (still have), a CZ 452 (new to me), and maybe a couple others I don't recall right now. Won't ever get rid of the Anschutz!

I am fortunate to have my own backyard 50-yard range with a solid bench, so all these guns have been shot a lot by me. I shoot the heavier sporters for groups from the bench and the light ones off-hand at my metal swingers. I also hunt on my property with them. I have purposely limited these guns to those that have sporter configurations and avoided those stocked solely for bench or formal target shooting, mostly because I know the sky can be the limit when playing with these specialty target guns and I just have a strong bias for 'sporters.' BTW, my "go to" ammos are SK Rifle Match and Lapua Center-X.

My most accurate rifle right now is this Sako Finnfire with a Lilja heavy stainless barrel and a 2-ounce Jewell trigger. It is not pretty, but it easily outshoots the Anschutz 1710:

KTG0yrN.jpg

I also greatly enjoy this Springfield. It has an NRA stock that someone (probably 60 or 70 years ago) gently and tastefully did some reshaping of the buttstock. The comb has been fluted, the grip has probably been reworked a little, and a Neider-style buttplate installed. The work is all subtle and creates the lines of a well-done classic sporter. The value, I am sure, has been hurt, but is sure is pretty. Using both front and rear apertures, along with a properly sized target, it shoots amazing 50-yard groups.

4V8TdLu.jpg

After giving up on Kimbers for my 'light' sporter, I just purchased a CZ 452 "One of a Thousand." It is a significantly upgraded final edition of the now discontinued 452. The stock has wrap around checkering, oil finished wood, a real ebony forend and an ebony grip cap. The metal portions have a very highly polished blue finish. It has some engraving on the receiver (similar to my old Remington 541S} that I don't really care for, but overall is is fairly good looking. I am going to do some trigger work on it today, and see how she shoots when we get some warmer weather this weekend. This rifle wouldn't really quality as a high-grade classic, but it might be fun for a while. Who knows, it could be a keeper.

KP2EdRc.jpg
 
Last edited:
They are very accurate, despite the fact that the recoil spring and its mount are attached forward of the action, directly to the underside of the barrel!
This is interesting, as the mechanism of my TC autoloader is quite different. Nothing is attached forward of the receiver (Except the barrel of course.) of my rifle, and nothing attached to the barrel. Must be completely different model series.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top