Sounds good, but we've seen the courts uphold things that are blatantly unconstitutional. Anything in the constitution is pretty much worthless if it doesn't agree with the "values" of the courts.
People growing marijuana for medicinal use by genuinely sick people in their immediate vicinity, legal in the state where they live, are jailed under the Commerce Clause because the mere existence of said pot "could affect interstate commerce," even though the pot would never cross state lines or be sold.
A private parking lot for a private company is "public use" under the 4th amendment, so someone's home can legally be seized at a lowball price, if the city council wants to.
Restrictions and bans on small-caliber military-style weapons are not an "infringement" under the 2nd amendment.
No-knock warrants are fine, even in circumstances that are not extraordinary. People who mistakenly shoot cops busting down the wrong door at 2am without identifying themselves get the death penalty, while 17-year-old cold-blooded killers can't get said penalty because it's "unusual" in Europe.
McCain-Feingold is not a violation of the 1st amendment's protection of political speech.
Late-term abortions -- baby-killing, that is, and I'm pro-choice -- are a Constitutional right under some unwritten right to privacy. (I actually like the privacy thing, but I'd rather see it spelled out.) But private acts like smoking a joint in your own home are NOT protected by this right to privacy, nor is carrying a concealed weapon without unlawful intent. It's completely random.
SCOTUS will save us. That's right.