WhoKnowsWho
Member
I can't even say if she is Anti or Not, she is kinda like the middle roader, but wouldn't deny taking all weapons away... but anyways...
She doesn't fear guns she says, she fears what they can do.
But doesn't like being around them, doesn't understand why people "like" something that was only made to kill kill kill.
She doesn't believe I can have fun and think of it as a sport even though we have ISPC, IDPA, shooting on the Olympics, etc.
Once in the wild, she says she would have liked her boyfriend to have his gun on him.
But doesn't think you should need one everywhere.
Examples of random rape, murder, kidnap, in normal city areas means nothing to her.
If her life was threatened she couldn't shoot someone.
But threaten someone she loves, (relative, etc) and she could use a gun to stop the threat.
I think she has a simple fear of people and what they are capable of, but she doesn't agree. Examples of said unstable people using cars, knives, pipes, and that an armed private citizen could stop it means nothing to her.
Also, she agrees her thoughts are probably affected because she lost someone close to gun violence. And admits, if they had been able to save themselves because they were armed, she might think the opposite and want to arm herself with protection. But since that wasn't what happened...
She thinks guns are too easy to kill from a distance. And I told her how bad some people shoot, but she just cares that there is a chance of being hit from a distance or close in. I told her I would be more afraid of the kitchen knife in close which led to...
She is afraid of knives. But doesn't think a 3500 pound car at 50 mph is even comparable as a weapon, since it is "mainly" used for transportation.
I need some argument help. Or is this a lost cause?
She doesn't fear guns she says, she fears what they can do.
But doesn't like being around them, doesn't understand why people "like" something that was only made to kill kill kill.
She doesn't believe I can have fun and think of it as a sport even though we have ISPC, IDPA, shooting on the Olympics, etc.
Once in the wild, she says she would have liked her boyfriend to have his gun on him.
But doesn't think you should need one everywhere.
Examples of random rape, murder, kidnap, in normal city areas means nothing to her.
If her life was threatened she couldn't shoot someone.
But threaten someone she loves, (relative, etc) and she could use a gun to stop the threat.
I think she has a simple fear of people and what they are capable of, but she doesn't agree. Examples of said unstable people using cars, knives, pipes, and that an armed private citizen could stop it means nothing to her.
Also, she agrees her thoughts are probably affected because she lost someone close to gun violence. And admits, if they had been able to save themselves because they were armed, she might think the opposite and want to arm herself with protection. But since that wasn't what happened...
She thinks guns are too easy to kill from a distance. And I told her how bad some people shoot, but she just cares that there is a chance of being hit from a distance or close in. I told her I would be more afraid of the kitchen knife in close which led to...
She is afraid of knives. But doesn't think a 3500 pound car at 50 mph is even comparable as a weapon, since it is "mainly" used for transportation.
I need some argument help. Or is this a lost cause?