How many folks really used those AR's they bought

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't shoot my AR15s frequently but I usually take them rabbit hunting every year.
I kind of go with Carlos Hathcock's golf club theory. I shoot what I want when I want something that is my business and mine alone. Doesn't mean I don't appreciate my AR15s because I don't shoot them enough.
 
Thanks Sam I am far from a Troll.
That should go without saying. "Trolling" is a term that is tossed around far too commonly. Pretty much any time someone asks a question that is challenging or argues a point that goes against "the norm" they're called a Troll. And that renders the definition of "trolling" meaningless.

You seemed to be limiting the question to people in here rather than the hundreds of thousands of folks who we know aren't really into guns as much as we are. My question was meant as a general concensus of the gun buying public, not limited gun enthusiasts like some of us.
I don't know if you meant that I, personally, am limiting this, but I certainly am not. In my very humble opinion, the folks buying multiple EBRs to stack 'em deep -- or for investment value -- are more likely to be folks like "us" who frequent internet forums and get far more worked up about coming political threats than the average gun owner.

Further, wow did you ever walk into my previous rueful comments about how impressed we are with ourselves! Who are "the hundreds of thousands of folks who we know aren't really into guns as much as we are?" Why do we presume to know what they do or don't do, how much they shoot, why they want a rifle, or even that they form a qualifiable, cohesive, group of some sort?

Now, lots of people did go out and buy a military-style rifle, but when the average Joe dumps over $1,000 on a luxury item -- in a foundering economy no less -- he's going to go play with it. Maybe not a lot, maybe not often, and maybe not in the manner that we would consider effective training/practice, but he IS going to put some rounds down range.

It's like guys who buy sports cars just because they can, not because they really will drive it. But it looks good in the driveway, and they can show it to other people who stop over.
Perhaps, but you said that going out and shooting met your definition of "USING." I say that these guys who are showing off their cool black rifle to their buddies ARE actually shooting their guns. Or at least HAVE shot them. Unless you're raising the bar to say "shoot them frequently" or "more than a couple of times" or whatever, I think it is unrealistic to maintain that the majority of new rifle owners haven't "used" their guns at all. Maybe I'm being naive about it but that goes against everything I know about the average gadget junkie (heck...the average GUY).

I have been around guns my entire life just as I have been around cars. It always amused me when someone would buy a 500 HP Vette or Viper, and drive it under the speed limit. If you enjoy something and afford it, there's nothing wrong with buying it.
Is this analogous to the guys who've only shot their rifles a few times? Or to the guys you think have never shot them? If someone buys a Corvette and only dirves the speed limit...it's kind of hard to argue that they haven't USED it. Maybe not well, maybe not to the fullest capacity -- but then again, I never killed a moose with my .58 Flintlock, either. ...

I am just willing to bet that many non shooters are sitting around with guns they will never use.
Maybe. But I'm an above-averagely (at least I assume I am ;)) active shooter and I'm sitting around with multiple guns that I'll never use. Or very rarely at least. Can't imagine I'll get a whole lot of range time in with my .30 Carbine Blackhawk. Really don't expect to use my .444 Marlin lever rifle a whole lot, either. Is this somehow different that the guy who only has one rifle and doesn't shoot it (much)?

But it just seems that whenever a question is asked in here latelly, it goes off the rails instead of just saying yes or no, or answering the question with an answer rather than another question.
Gym, I guess this is where my recent series of questions came from. Unless you're really looking for some quantifiable measurement of something, it is pretty uncommon to have a conversation that consists entirely of "yes" and "no" (or numeric) answers. Human discussions tends to wander and explore every facet of a subject. That's what makes it engaging. If you had limited this to strictly numerical percentage guesses you'd probably have had about six responses and then folks would have lost interest entirely.

Unless you're a robot, calculator, or die-hard Keno fan, a verbal exchange of unrelated numbers does NOT constitute a conversation. :D Instead you find that folks want to discuss their own experiences, relate anecdotes they think are illustrative, theorize about their fellow shooters (and the "average" other guy), and even dissect YOUR motive for asking the question. I see this in every thread I read. Sometimes we do step in to try to "herd the cats" back into roughly the same direction, but more often than not someone will expand a conversation into a new dimension and it becomes far more rich and colorful because of it.

I notice a general argumentitive tone lately. Maybe it's just me.
Well, I am with you on that. We really do try to keep things civil, but, again, it is the nature of the beast. The "dialectic process" if you will. You don't reach truth through everyone looking at a question in exactly the same way and arriving at exactly the same conclusion. You arrive at truth by making sure it has been viewed (argued) from all directions until only the best answer (or two) remains un-disproved. The gentlemanly thing is to accomplish this without losing your cool or insulting your fellow debaters.

sometimes it's just amusing how people who have been into this for a few years, feel a sense of entitlement to express their opinion as though they have more experience and knowledge than some of us who have made wearing a gun, just part of getting dressed in the mourning.
Oh certainly. The old hands always look at the next generation and laugh at how impressed they are with themselves. And the next generation looks back at the old hands and laments that they are stagnant and losing relevance. It is probably best to be in neither camp but to simply take the best you can from everyone you meet.

I didn't mean any disrespect to you
And I never did to you either, and I hope you take my thoughts as sincere efforts to further discourse and improve our community here.

Have a great night!
 
Last edited:
is it a beanfield rifle? nope, its not an sks sniper rifle wearing a countersniper mildot and purple laser that would impress dolph lundgren but i digress.

........ and now we are talking about........
 
Last edited by a moderator:
and now we are talking about

dolph lundgren's SKS sniper rifle ... weren't you paying attention? :rolleyes:


And "game" ... like deer or people.

(Pssst! .... Remind me never to eat over at marduk's house, mmm'k?)


;)


:D
 
You don't answer a question with a question, that's the reason that many folks have stopped asking them. There is no need to write a mini-series, to answer a simple question, Nor to sit and cut and paste what was said in the previous post, unless you have way too much time on your hands. I actually haven't been around this forum nearly as musch a six months back, and that's one of the main reasons why. Logoria, I'll be taking a break from here.
It's just too annoying to keep responding to such nonsense when you ask a simple question.
 
You don't answer a question with a question
If the question isn't simple, or isn't clear, or is limited when the topic would seem to warrant a much broader undertanding, you ... well I do.

that's the reason that many folks have stopped asking them.
Who has stopped asking questions? As of 12:09 am we have had 231 posts since midnight. Are you saying that if we all just made concise, one-word (or numeric) answers to every question then the folks would REALLY start to flock in here? We are a very active forum, and I think most folks come for the engaging discourse, not for basic data retreival.

There is no need to write a mini-series, to answer a simple question,
You really were just looking for one-word answers, weren't you? What is so wrong about conversation?

Nor to sit and cut and paste what was said in the previous post,
The great thing about a forum is that you actually can respond to everything someone says -- line by line. You can communicate many different concepts very efficiently that way.

unless you have way too much time on your hands
Ouch. Well, now I guess you're really angry, if you've stooped to posting on an internet forum picking on other people for posting on an internet forum. I responded to YOUR thread. Guess we both have too much time...
 
What do you mean used? As in shot? Or as in to protect from zombies/black helicopters etc.
 
I've got a couple of stripped lowers in the closet. They are not being used.

BUT

One of my ARs does quite a bit of hog hunting. Don't tell the folks in the hog hunting forms, many insist that a .223 is not enough gun. Five or six have gone down to that particular gun and none have moved more than 10'.

One AR has been "lost" to the kids. It has had a .22LR bolt/carrier in it for about 18 months months. Gets at least a bulk pack or two run through it every time the kids are down at the river (about once a month).

Third I use for plinking Maybe a hundred rounds a couple of time a month.

Just bought a new 6.8 SPC upper for hog hunting...mainly so I don't have to listen to the anti .223 hunting crowd any more:neener:

So, do they get "used"?
 
To the OP, why do you limit the question to AR's and AK's? I think that may be one thing that makes the question seem a little odd, i.e. the unstated assumption that AR/AK rifles and carbines are for some reason going to be "used" less than grandpa's Remchesters, or than all the Glocks and Rugers and Mossbergs that people went out and bought during the sales surge.

If anything, AR's and AK's appear to be shot more than more traditionally styled firearms, given that the top selling calibers of centerfire rifle ammunition in the USA have been .223 and 7.62x39mm for a pretty long time. I know that at my local range, shooters of "black rifles" outnumber shooters of all other styles of rifles combined.
 
Last edited:
It's just too annoying to keep responding to such nonsense when you ask a simple question.

Then maybe refrain from asking questions? Thats not meant to be rude, but thats the thing about posting on the internet....you don't get to cherrypick the responses you want and flush the rest. EVERYONE who has an opinion or some insight is allowed to answer, even if their answers aren't up to whatever you define as "par". What may be nonsense to you is interesting to other people and vice versa. I'm sorry if you don't care for the repsonses you get, but it seems pretty silly to make a big deal about not getting the precise responses you wanted when anyone is free to answer as they see fit.....and YOU are free to respond as YOU wish...or not respond at all.....no one is forcing you to continue the thread you started, are they?
 
I traded my .44 magnum for a ratty looking, but unmolested AR.

It shoots well enough for me, I have my fun with it, and it is actually distracting me from my pistol shooting.

Again ... I can only afford to go shooting a couple times a month.
 
I used to compete with mine. Then when the "Assault Weapon Ban" went into effect in CT (the first time), I ran all over the place trying to get "Paperwork" that would have allowed me to keep it. Everywhere I went I just kept getting the run-around. So I finally just sold it. It was my favorite gun. I haven't replaced it yet.
 
To the OP, why do you limit the question to AR's and AK's? I think that may be one thing that makes the question seem a little odd, i.e. the unstated assumption that AR/AK rifles and carbines are for some reason going to be "used" less than grandpa's Remchesters, or than all the Glocks and Rugers and Mossbergs that people went out and bought during the sales surge.

This sums up well what I was hinting at a bunch of posts back. I know a lot of shooters. Every one of them has somewhere between "a couple" and a "freaking TON" of guns, but I generally see them show up at the range with a select two or three that they really enjoy shooting most, or that they are trying to concentrate on developing their skills with.

"Most" of their other guns, I've probably never even seen -- and the same is true about me. I shoot at least once a week and often more, but I don't shoot most of my guns more than once or twice a year, and some of them not for many years at a time.

I think the versatility and pure entertainment value of the military style carbines (which can be shot in various kinds of matches, in the tactical classes which are popular now, as well as for teaching new shooters and just general plinking) would suggest that most of them will be shot MORE often than more "traditional" guns which most owners seem to only bring out for a few shots around hunting season.

But that's just my opinion.
 
A better question would be how many don't use them.

I use everything I own and won't buy something I would only buy as a safe queen - which would include an AK, AR, etc.
 
Even if they don't...
It's not hard to retrain yourself on a rifle. Realistically, every spring I have to do it because I don't shoot much in the winter. I start off with a little rimfire to sharpen my skills again, then switch to centerfires. I can pick up pretty decent proficiency again within forty rounds or so.
So assume those guys, many of whom own other rifles, bought their AK's and AR's, shot them some to ensure reliablity or just enjoy the forbidden fruit, then put them in the safe.
If need be, they could be back up to a decent level of skill with a few hundred rounds of .22LR and a hundred rounds of centerfire ammo. Not experts, but far from helpless, especially if they already hunt or shoot.

Personally, I'm a huge fan of well maintained semi-automatic magazine fed rifles in the closet of every law-abiding citizen in the US. Even if they do only get shot once every six months.
 
A friend of mine bought an AR today. I don't think he'll be a regular shooter but I'm steering him towards joining my range and getting a NRA membership. He'll probably be a 2 or 3 times per year shooter if I judge him correctly.
 
I use my AR all the time. It goes to the range, sits in the truck, and I use it to hunt hogs. Just your every day flat-top DPMS with an Eotech on it and O.D. Green furniture.

Makes a great gun to sit in the tripod stand and wait for them to come to the feeder and a great spot and stalk gun. A lot of people turn their nose at using 223 on hogs but I've yet to have one go more than 30 yards. The last one just stiffened out his legs and plopped over.

I've had some Axis deer, coyote and bobcats at feeder lately and they're going to be it's next victims.

It's kinda funny when you open the gun safe and go "30-30...nah, .308 Marlin bolt action...nah, 12 gauge slug...nah, old Remington 700 in .270...nah, let's take the AR again!"
 
I know persons who had no interest in owning firearms prior to Obama but began to realize and/or fear that their Constitutional rights were in danger. Some of them asked the question "We think they are going to take away our right to own a gun and we want to get one so what should we get?". I also ran into Obama fans that were gun enthusiasts (yes they really exist) and started to quiety buy more guns and ammo. I dont care if persons dont routinely shoot I only care that somehow they get good instruction ,learn safe handling and shoot periodically and safely. Sometimes we have lots of them and cant use them frequently enough. Maybe our frequency of usage is based on participation in hunting or competition. Maybe family responsibilties take precedence or financial reasons. Leave persons alone regarding their reasons for ownership they have the right. I at first sat back and watched the buying craze and then when a certain model became available after quite awhile i got one. I did watch a Sig 556 climb from $1100 to $1900 in less than a year from Nov 2008 at the same shop.

I own some paperweights too. They make good trade-in material sometimes or you have something to sell and keep the money or get another one. Thats part of the fun. Plinking and socializing at the range is fun too.
 
I know that at my local range, shooters of "black rifles" outnumber shooters of all other styles of rifles combined.

Around here that will depend on what part of the range you are on.
On the 50 yard you see a lot of the EBR stuff. I almost never see another EBR on the 100 yard. I see more K98 and Mosin 91/30 than I see AR15 based rifles at longer ranges. It is very close to never seeing an AK at 100+.
Stretch that out to 200, mostly deer rifles and a lot of Rem 700 based. The tendency for most EBR owners is to put EOTech, red-dot or other no-magnification optics on them, or to just leave them open sight. Most consider the AR style as a shorter distant weapon, although they were designed with more in mind. My EBR is .308 with a 4X scope on it, and it works great at 100+ yards. And it gets into the rotation of range trips. I usually only take a couple of rifles at a time, so it can be several weeks before the Bushie gets to go again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top