That aside, I still don't have any hesitation in using the .260 Remington on elk sized game out to 500 yards. At 2,200 fps and around 1,500 ft-lb of energy at that distance, I'm confident that the bullet will do its job if I put it where it's supposed to go (and putting that bullet where it is supposed to go at 500 yards isn't much of a problem at all -- that gun/cartridge combination excels at distance shooting). My personal large game limits with this caliber aren't set based on arrival velocity as much as arrival energy (the other side of the ballistics equation). I like to keep my elk loads in the 1,400-1,500 ft-lb of energy range on target, which falls in between 500-600 yards. I should add that I'm certainly not taking the .260 Rem out to hunt lions in Africa, but elk sure aren't lions!
We all make our own choices and for me I want a bullet that will drive through 6 feet of elk meat and a bone or two in the event that a world class bull stands up with a few minutes of light left on the last day and he's not giving me a good broadside opportunity. The 6.5 Creedmoor is a good cartridge and I have quite a lot of experience with it, both handloading for it and shooting it in various rifles, but it's just not my choice for hunting deer and elk just as the .375 H&H isn't yours. Neither of us is wrong, we just have different approaches to a similar problem.
Out of interest, what rifle/scope combination are you using for your .260 Rem?
Last edited: