How they will take your Guns....

Status
Not open for further replies.

bjbarron

Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
322
Location
Jersey - *gag*
This piece appeared in American Drumslinger last Thursday...

How Will They Confiscate Your Guns?

For decades I have heard gun owners claim that the government would never be able to confiscate our firearms because the government would lose too many men. The implication being, of course, that gun owners wouldactively resist confiscation, even to the point of shooting back.

But I believe this thinking is outdated and doesn't align very well with reality. But before you tell me how big your honor guard in Hell will be when that day comes, let's think about how the government could really do it.

Suppose, for the sake of argument, the government bans all civilian possession of firearms at the end of this month.

Gun owners get some grace period to turn them in, even beyond the deadline, without being charged with a crime. If we use Australia and Britain as examples there will still be a significant number of firearms that are not turned in. Some estimates put the Australian turn-in at less than 25% and the British faired only about 28%. But Australians and the British have long been used to obeying almost every gun control law. Not so the Americans. When laws are passed that we don't like, we bite. We scratch. We vote. So here we sit after the guns have been collected and the amnesties have run out. Now what? Send out the personnel carriers, swat and shock troops to seize the guns from those militia "terrorists" who refused to turn them in? Don't be silly.

The government has lots of records about you. If you purchased a firearm since 1968, chances are that they have some record of it somewhere. Most likely, it will take quite some time for them to compile all the serial numbers of "surrendered" guns (surrendered essentially at gunpoint) and cross off the ones you turned in. It'll take more time for them to attempt to "clean up" their data. Say, about two years, maybe three. Add to that the hordes of people keypunching in hundreds of thousands of sales and registration records from hundreds of gun stores forced out of business. At some point the government decides they have something approaching a "good" database of unaccounted-for guns.

The next thing you'll get from the government is an official looking notice that they think you still have a firearm. Their information will probably include all the information from registration forms, right down to the serial number. That notice will tell you that you're in violation of the law, subject to prosecution and imprisonment. It will give you some period of time to surrender the gun. It will also give you a very limited number of days to return the form with an explanation of why you don't have the gun, any proof you have, and your signature that the gun was lawfully disposed of. For many people the idea that the government "knows" they didn't turn in that pistol or rifle and they have the detailed information about it will be enough to get them to surrender the gun. Some people will ignore the letter, others will scrawl a note that "I sold this in 1982 in a private sale". After some time, the government will figure out how many guns are still out there and what the "compliance rate" is with the gun ban. More importantly, they'll start sorting their database by the number of guns someone supposedly has "unaccounted".

If you think they'll come at these multiple-gun owners with a swat team, guess again. Their most likely tactic will be yet another letter (maybe two more) that generate what they'll call "insufficient responses". That means they can't track a gun after you owned it. This they'll use as fodder for a search warrant and/or perjury charges at a later date if they can. My guess is that the time between April and August will be a bad time for a lot of "former" gun owners. Remember that the BATF is an arm of the Treasury department and they control the IRS. You'll probably get a notice in the mail that the IRS has some questions about your taxes or wants to audit you. When you make the appointment to visit the IRS they will pass that information to the BATF. While you are sweating over your deductions, the BATF and local police will execute a search warrant and search your home looking for guns. With you safely off site and distracted, essentially forced into "the royal presence" of the IRS they will snag your guns. Expect them to use slow-scan and ground penetrating radar to search walls, yards, under the patio or deck, the basement, etc. You might even find your hot tub has been drained and moved. Yes, they'll search your car in the IRS parking lot too.

If you are one of the those people they suspect of having multiple guns and they don't find any guns at your home, expect them to find and search storage facilities, safety deposit boxes and other places you might use. Warn your relatives who live nearby that they can expect a visit too, even (or perhaps especially) if they never owned a gun. If they are thorough, I'd expect the government agents to check your neighbors to see which of them previously owned a gun and perhaps search their homes, arguing that your neighbor could have held your guns while agents searched your home. Remember that at this point the government authorities don't have much to fear from the general population. And by the time your complaints are run through the mill, rejected and turned into lawsuits, they'll have changed the rules.

But you only have one gun you say? Fine. They won't come looking for it. But they will make sure that possession of ammunition is also a serious crime. Don't leave any loose cartridges around and where will you hide that case of ammo you rushed out to buy? Expect any "gun parts" to be made illegal at some point in time too. Spare magazines, maybe even old cleaning kits.

Anything that says "gun" will be interpreted as "probable cause" to search your entire home. Also expect that you can never use that gun without becoming a serious felon in the eyes of the government. Even if some thug has repeatedly stabbed you with a large knife and threatened to rape your six year old daughter, they won't forgive you for having the gun. They may even give you extra penalties for using it to save your family. Especially if you are one of the first few hundred people caught this way, they will use you to "set an example". This will cause people to "bury" their guns away in hiding places, making them all but useless. If the government does come to confiscate it, you won't be able to get to it fast enough and they will probably find it.

You've moved several times since you bought a gun? Remember showing your ID when you bought a gun? Remember writing down your place of birth? Why do you think the government has so many computers? Linking you to your new driver's license in another state shouldn't be too hard. Besides, the Treasury folks know where you work. Think you're safe because you had unregistered guns? Think again. I would expect that the government's database will contain a lot of old data. Some of it might indicate that a gun was sold to a resident at your address. If they can tie you to ammo sales or range use with your credit card in the previous 2 years you might get a surprise visit. Or that seller might have remembered you bought that gun from him and filled out his gun notice to get "off the hook" for that gun.

The point of this article is that by thinking in limited terms of a "raid" to confiscate guns we lose sight of the alternative methods the government can use. Put yourself in the government's position and think of your own methods to avoid a conflict.
 
Sobering

They might take a number of firearms from a large number of the populance but not from me,I would do my best to take as many down with me,I wouldn't be marched quietly into a patty wagon or out to some prison I would be laid to rest along side my Uncle and my Grandfather,in other words I would fight tooth and nail until I was shot either by one of the agents sent to arrest me,or by the large number of state agents taking up postions along the front of my property.
 
Good. now if there are a million more like you we might have a chance under such a scenerio. Keep in mind though that your own family and neighbors will be given lots of incentive to turn you in. People will ostracize you if they think you're under such suspicion.

Are there a million out there willing to take the abuse? If so can they organize well enough to make a difference? The latter was the entire theory behind the militia movement, before Slick Willy managed to so expertly compromise it.
 
I don't think they'll have to do all this work to get them - with the education processes now being used, all they'll have to do is wait til the current grade school population are adults and the majority will happily turn them in. They'll be a few they don't get in the initial passes, but they'll eventually show up and those hanging on to them will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law - making an example for the rest of the hangers-on.
 
Any Australia style ban with a grace period would in itself trigger a reaction more intense than anything down under. The antis, even the wild eyed ones, know this. They are taking a much more gradual approach here, starting with the young at schools. This is why "the children" are always at the heart of anti arguments. They know they cannot win with the current generation in power. But if the young people are indoctrinated to fear firearms and slammed with "zero tolerance" expulsions and even arrest if they so much as DRAW a firearm or DISCUSS one. You better believe this is having a long-term impact.
 
The government has lots of records about you. If you purchased a firearm since 1968, chances are that they have some record of it somewhere.

Chances are that they don't. Virginia law allows private sales without a NICS call or FFL. And all of the records prior to somewhere around 1980 would not be computerized, hence difficult to search.
 
You'll probably get a notice in the mail that the IRS has some questions about your taxes or wants to audit you. When you make the appointment to visit the IRS they will pass that information to the BATF

Sure they will. There are undoubtedly thousands of IRS employees who will be happy to commit a felony by transferring confidential taxpayer data to another Federal agency without a (Judicially reviewed) subpoena or warrant.

Do people actually have nothing better to do with their time than to sit around dreaming this stuff up? And why can't they ever seem to take the time do do even a minimal amount of research to learn how the Government & Justice System actually works.

I am making a mental note to buy more stock in Reynold's Aluminum. :cool:
 
I will die before I give up my guns.... and hopefully I'll take a few of them with me.
 
They are taking a much more gradual approach here, starting with the young at schools. This is why "the children" are always at the heart of anti arguments. They know they cannot win with the current generation in power. But if the young people are indoctrinated to fear firearms and slammed with "zero tolerance" expulsions and even arrest if they so much as DRAW a firearm or DISCUSS one. You better believe this is having a long-term impact.


Good point which explains why every one of us has the responsibility to reach out to the younger folks as well as adult non-shooters and invite them to become involved in the shooting sports. Once the inevitable "fun factor" is turned on, then we start enlightening them on how important the 2nd amendment is.......

I have an appointment with a female colleague to go do some trap shooting as soon as the school year is over. Then we're going handgunning......then rifle shooting.
 
This is exactly the type of paranoid rant that tears this country apart.

Please everyone, there is nothing to see here.....just keep on moving, and go about your business as if nothing has happened here........
 
Just wondering.....

Why are so many people quick to say "I'll give up my guns when yada, yada, yada.."

instead of,

"Well, next election, get off your duff and VOTE!!!!!"

No "protest" votes, just get the candidate who best represents our interests, and who has a hope in Hades of winning---and VOTE!!!!!

We have the means to effect change through the ballot first, instead of through the bullet. Why do we not exercise it?
 
I think this scenario is very well thought out and quite plausible. Regardless of how future generations feel about firearms, there will always be some who believe in the 2nd ammendment. When/If government confiscation ever comes I suspect it will look much like this.
 
Dont you remember how many people were seriously getting ready to start an insurrection during the clinton/reno years? What do you think Oklahoma city was about? Everyone talks about killing children, but it was really about attacking the feds. The MSM just painted Oklahoma city in the most negative terms possible because its their job to safeguard the establishment.

If the Fed bites US gun owners, US gunowners have the means to bite back. If this sort of monkeybusiness started on my watch, I would gladly render assistance to neighbors and friends. You dont have to wait for them to come for you to start doing the right thing.

Also, I find it unlikely that the local shops would hand over the 4473s if they were forced out of business by a ban on all firearms. Either they would burn all the records or someone would help them.
 
Confiscation scenario

I agree with MaterDei - this is certainly one possibility, and a well-thought out one described. It probably would take some time to execute, in the order of several years.
Vote early, and vote often.

We may be one of the last relatively free generations.

On th eother hand, the latest US military activities has added a whole new group of young people who have had exposure to firearms, so there is hope.
 
Also, I find it unlikely that the local shops would hand over the 4473s if they were forced out of business by a ban on all firearms. Either they would burn all the records or someone would help them.

The risk of going to "club fed", a heavy fine or both would deter more FFLs from destroying their 4473 than you think. IMHO
 
Remember that the BATF is an arm of the Treasury department and they control the IRS.
tinfoil.gif

Well when crap like this gets posted, you have proof that it's tinhatted nonsense. The ATF is now in Justice not Treasury. Regardless even when ATF was in Treasury they did not control the IRS. Anyone who knows the history of ATF knows this. ATF started as the Acohol Tax Unit of IRS-CID, then was renamed ATF while still part of IRS-CID. IRS-CID controlled ATF until 1972 when Congress created ATF as a stand alone agency within Treasury, in part so that they could ensure more direct control over ATF's priorities without the influence of IRS-CID's management. Again, ATF never had control over the IRS, or even IRS-CID, and certainly has no control over them now.
 
Please everyone, there is nothing to see here.....just keep on moving, and go about your business as if nothing has happened here........

Yes, bury your heads, folks. Don't read things that might cause you to consider potentialities outside the box. You might actually make a difference then.

Cool Hand: Without question IRS employees will hand over whatever they are told to. The paycheck is far more important than your personal data. Also, if we're talking about a firearms ban which violates the fundamental law of the land then changing some silly little privacy reg for an oraganization or two that are already out of control is nothing.

"Stroke of the pen, law of the land. Kinda cool, eh?"
 
Perhaps someone who is in law enforcement might chime in on this thread. I've been told by law-enforcement officers that when they answer a domestic disturbance call, they have available gun-purchase information for that household and respond differently if someone from the household has purchased a firearm. Since such records are supposed to be destroyed, this information should not be available. Which may be the case, and my source may have been in need of a tinfoil hat himself, but if it is true, the government is already sharing much more supposedly non-existant confidential information than in the above scenario.
 
sobering composition of assumptions... just keep in mind, to win the "war" one must win the "battles"...so do what you can TODAY.
 
Perhaps someone who is in law enforcement might chime in on this thread. I've been told by law-enforcement officers that when they answer a domestic disturbance call, they have available gun-purchase information for that household and respond differently if someone from the household has purchased a firearm. Since such records are supposed to be destroyed, this information should not be available. Which may be the case, and my source may have been in need of a tinfoil hat himself, but if it is true, the government is already sharing much more supposedly non-existant confidential information than in the above scenario.


We in NH do not have this information. We only have listed people listed for a license for a pistol or revolver. (concealed carry License) This is not on the state wide data base just the town data base.
 
Yellow Forms are never destroyed, they are kept by the FFL holder that sold the firearm. If said FFL holder should go out of business, all yellows must be sent to the ATF.

Gun dealers will give up copies of your forms in a heartbeat and don't ever fool yourself by believing otherwise. When the ATF JBTs dropped by my house for a chat, they had a copy of the form for every gun I'd purchased from an FFL dealer in the last three years--encompassing some 12 dealers in two states.

(For DMF and others: No, I don't believe all Feds are JBTs. But when they start the interview with a lie, and proceed to threats when I assert my constitutional rights.....well, the boot fits.)
 
We have the means to effect change through the ballot first, instead of through the bullet. Why do we not exercise it?
Gee, Powderman ... quit making sense. It's stuff like this:
and hopefully I'll take a few of them with me.
that tends to worry me, though.
 
Two simple things are worth bearing in mind ..

The frog in the pot of water

And - Ayn Rand ...
"Did you really think we want those laws observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We want them to be broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against... We're after power and we mean it... There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted ? and you create a nation of law-breakers ? and then you cash in on guilt. Now that's the system, Mr. Reardon, that's the game, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with." -- 'Atlas Shrugged' 1957
 
Gee, Powderman ... quit making sense.

So, umm, what have we been doing these past decades if not trying to change things by the ballot? When does it finally become time to accept the ballot has failed? Why is the always trotted out old cliche of the ballot hailed as "making sense" no matter how long it fails?
 
"I've been told by law-enforcement officers that when they answer a domestic disturbance call, they have available gun-purchase information for that household and respond differently if someone from the household has purchased a firearm."

I have never heard of such a thing. I am not aware of any linked database that would provide that kind of info, not NCICS or any of the state systems.

FWIW, A smart cop responds to ANY domestic alert for the presence of weapons. I automatically assume that they are present, even if it is a pair of scissors or a pot of hot water. Where I live it would be rare to find a household that DIDNT have guns.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top