Monkeyleg
Member.
Today I stopped by the office of a business associate. Our talk eventually turned, as it often does, to RKBA.
To give some background on this fellow: while I was trying to get into Mary Jane _____'s purty pink panties, he was over in VietNam, at first with the infantry and then again as Special Forces. (Yes, I've verified this).
Anyway, he loves the idea of concealed carry, keeps a home defense gun, does some shooting and believes in much of what I do.
However, he has a problem with the idea of people being able to go out and buy full-autos without a background check (we're talking hypotheticals here: my beliefs versus his). His position is that he's seen what M16's, M60's and other full-autos can do, and doesn't want them in the hands of just anyone, especially idiots and criminals.
I pointed to his Ford Explorer and explained how many people he could run down with one of those, and how any idiot or criminal could buy one. His response was that an M16 or M60 would do a lot more damage.
I also mentioned that, prior to the NFA of 1934, civilians weren't that interested in full-auto's, perhaps due to the cost of ammo and that, even with civilian possession being legal in most of the country, there still aren't that many sold.
He remained unconvinced, and replied that things have changed with regard to bad guys since 1934, a point that's hard to argue, since we do have more shooters than in days past.
At this point I was just about out of ammo. He's been there, I haven't. He's not opposed to permits, registration and so on, even though I think I made a convincing case for the "confiscation follows registration" argument. He wonders why the hardline gun owners won't compromise.
I'll be seeing this guy tomorrow. Any suggestions on how to "flip" him? (I think he's close to being ready).
To give some background on this fellow: while I was trying to get into Mary Jane _____'s purty pink panties, he was over in VietNam, at first with the infantry and then again as Special Forces. (Yes, I've verified this).
Anyway, he loves the idea of concealed carry, keeps a home defense gun, does some shooting and believes in much of what I do.
However, he has a problem with the idea of people being able to go out and buy full-autos without a background check (we're talking hypotheticals here: my beliefs versus his). His position is that he's seen what M16's, M60's and other full-autos can do, and doesn't want them in the hands of just anyone, especially idiots and criminals.
I pointed to his Ford Explorer and explained how many people he could run down with one of those, and how any idiot or criminal could buy one. His response was that an M16 or M60 would do a lot more damage.
I also mentioned that, prior to the NFA of 1934, civilians weren't that interested in full-auto's, perhaps due to the cost of ammo and that, even with civilian possession being legal in most of the country, there still aren't that many sold.
He remained unconvinced, and replied that things have changed with regard to bad guys since 1934, a point that's hard to argue, since we do have more shooters than in days past.
At this point I was just about out of ammo. He's been there, I haven't. He's not opposed to permits, registration and so on, even though I think I made a convincing case for the "confiscation follows registration" argument. He wonders why the hardline gun owners won't compromise.
I'll be seeing this guy tomorrow. Any suggestions on how to "flip" him? (I think he's close to being ready).