Lots of interesting comments on the web about it. First, it's not a 1911.It's a double stack metal framed auto pistol with the bore line lowered as much as possible. That meant moving the recoil spring assembly from over the trigger guard to in front of it. That is where the spring and recoil rod are now housed, which gives it the bulky front nose look.
It uses a striker fired assembly, which doesn't make it a Glock either. I've read in a lot of online posts about how it's some miscegnated offspring of a 1911 and Glock, when in point of fact it's a different and much more modern take on handgun design that attempts to do the same thing as a Chiappa revolver.
Altho "Chiappa" has it's baggage, too.
I'll wait and see how it holds up in the hands of testers, will it survive the first year of production, etc. It's not a price range I normally shop so for the most part I'm indifferent. $1,100 is a lot even tho most authentic war era 1911's are in that price range. I will continue to pick up used metal framed guns at bargain basement prices that are going out of production, which is where money gets the most bang for the buck.
The new Gun of the Month buyers will be lined up, of that I have no doubts. And they will be trying to wring out the shortest doubles times on the range to see if it really does help having the recoil spring in front of the trigger guard. Me, I would have liked a single stack compact and that space used for a gas delay chamber aka HK P7.