P5 Guy
Member
With advances in technology will guns that spit lead projectiles be a danger to the authorities in 25 to 50 years?
I must say he bounced all over the place. That is a shame as the topic is very important & relevant for us all. I would like to see another discussion on this without the craziness involved. The evidence was there, he was given a very well laid out statement by SAM 1911. And treated his statement as a challenge or insault. I was hoping Sam was right about the wheels turning. This should teach us a lesson that we learn from. We are a house divided! Can we reach across that divide & come to a understanding! I pray we can! The Bill of Rights & the Constitution hopefully will be there in 25 or 50 years. So whatever is in use should be cover by those crazy old revolutionarys that brought this great Republic into being.
I do not believe we are a house divided.
I do not believe that one of the people that has been posted here for the last few weeks lives in this house.
I would like to know how others feel about the 9th.amd. backing up the 2nd.amd. . I feel that it makes up for the things that our founding father's didn't know about, but knew would come. Like a catch all for things missed, not covered, not thought of yet! I could be wrong! But think I am on the right track. Any thoughts?
Anyone who believes our armed forces will not fire on us if ordered to do so is delusional. If there is a incerection [SIC] and you're part of it, this government will
have you shot by whomever it sends in
Respect.Ok. I officially retract my statements. I guess while needing a license to own a gun in public seems like a good idea, as proved to me by other members states where you don't need a license don't have any more issues then one's that do.
Foot, meet mouth, lol.
I understand what you are saying. I do think it was put there for unforeseen rights & issues thy knew would come up. A catch all phrase. In that sense I feel it helps as in : just because they didn't write it down, I can have my AR15. It confers implied rights. I hope that made sense.
Respect
Gun control is not about guns.
We are a house divided!
This individual is an anti, plain and simple
Some clarification here would be gratefully appreciated.
1. I support the second amendment.
2. There needs to be common sense.