BuddyOne
Member
Delayed Reaction
The name says it all...now he can go back to "flipping channels".
Buddy
The name says it all...now he can go back to "flipping channels".
Buddy
This new member may have been calling the organization that name or is so new he doesn't realize we don't call each other names here.but as soon as I'm called 'commi scum' I'm pretty sure it's time to move on
There is Bush bashing going on in almost every thread his name appears in!!I guess it's only The High Road when we talk about President Bush as if he can do no wrong.
DelayedReaction said:Honestly I think that's just a cop-out to ensure their primarily-liberal supporters don't go nuts. If the Supreme Court established a position affirming the individual right to keep and bear arms, I think we'd see the ACLU start opposing gun control more forcefully. For the moment the fact that they don't support gun control, coupled with their views on several areas I agree with, made me decide to join them.
They most certainly do not say that only the government can own guns.
Yeah, I definitely will start comparing their begging drives. The NRA has really impressed me with their ability to plead for money.
I agree, the ACLU is just like Hitler. Except that they're against racism, war, restricting speech, secret arrests, the death penalty and government control of the press. And the fact that many ACLU members are Jewish might be a problem too. Other than that, lots in common. Like for example, some ACLU members have facial hair.Lupinus said:It does one good. Hitler did a lot of good too. Hitler was an idiot that ended up harming his country more then anyone thought possible, so with the ACLU if they keep at the current rate.
What! You oppose putting Bibles in school lunches at abortion clinics?? That's just what Jean-Bedel Bokassa would say!
NAMBLA's evil plan to ban our 50-caliber war on some drugs from this fine city's nativity scene is reminiscent of the authoritarian rule of Nicolae Ceaucescu!
Ideals and views different yes, and I am not trying to say they hold any views the same. My point was that just because a little good was done it doesn't erase all the bad. Hitler turned Germany out of its post WW1 slump, made it a major world power, and created many jobs. He did a lot of good. Does that erase all the bad that he did? Not by a long shot. The ACLU does a little good with the patriot act and a few other little things here and there for the press. But it doesn't erase all the bad they do. They would love nothing better then to erase all public displays of religion, unless it of course is anything other then Christianity. A college in NC a few years ago had a Muslim book on the list choice for required reading. You didn't have to read it but it was among the choices, there were no Christian books. You think the ACLU would have left it alone if it was a Christian book and not a Muslim one? They and their major supporters would love nothing more then a socialist nation. They would love nothing more then to make this country a bigger cesepool with their commie leftist BS then it already is. They fight the patriot act, whoopidy doo. They do a lot more bad then good. The few issues doesn't define an organization the majority issues do. I have zero respect for the ACLU as an organization. And actually giving your money to it? Well my mother taught me if you cant say anyting nice...I agree, the ACLU is just like Hitler. Except that they're against racism, war, restricting speech, secret arrests, the death penalty and government control of the press. And the fact that many ACLU members are Jewish might be a problem too. Other than that, lots in common. Like for example, some ACLU members have facial hair.
Would it be safe to say that the ACLU does not believe in a constructionist view of the costitution and is more in the living document camp?
Mongo the Mutterer said:Two citizens being hassled unjustly, and in the case of Dr. Hatfill, having their reputation destroyed is not good, but may be handled by compensation. Small price to pay for increased security IMO.
They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security.
DelayedReaction said:So I joined. Within the next few days my wallet will simultaneously contain membership cards from the ACLU and the NRA...
Sounds like the same argument Gun Grabbers use.IN BRIEF
The national ACLU is neutral on the issue of gun control. We believe that the Constitution contains no barriers to reasonable regulations of gun ownership. If we can license and register cars, we can license and register guns. -
ACLU POLICY
"The ACLU agrees with the Supreme Court's long-standing interpretation of the Second Amendment [as set forth in the 1939 case, U.S. v. Miller] that the individual's right to bear arms applies only to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia. Except for lawful police and military purposes, the possession of weapons by individuals is not constitutionally protected. Therefore, there is no constitutional impediment to the regulation of firearms." --Policy #47 http://www.aclu.org/police/gen/14523res20020304.html?ht=handguns handguns
If every NRA member also joined the ACLU, we could change it. An organization is made up of its membership. Change can occur. Generally very slowly, but it does occur.
And very effective on doing a lot of bad. Sorry, it doesn't balance out. They can keep fighting the patriot act, but they will do it without my money or support. The Red Cross does a lot of good so it balances out. The ACLU does on good thing and a lot of bad. They are an UnAmerican socalist organization. I support their right to exist, but I will never support them without a complete change of policy.The ACLU has been very effective at fighting the PATRIOT act in the courts and the congress and I for one am willing to put up with their crap for the time being on that basis.