I know this is a bad idea BUT

Status
Not open for further replies.
My 2 aluminum scuba tanks have 3,000 and 3.300 psi rated fill pressures.
You can get tanks with 4,500 psi rated fill pressures.
You can have the scuba shop fill your 3,000 and 3,300 psi tanks to 3,300 and 3,600 psi, respectively, because the tank pressure drops after the fill air cools.
I use my 2 tanks for precharged pneumatic rifles that run on 3,000 psi.
You should be able to get steel tanks that hold at least 3,00 psi safely.

If I were going to use steel reinforcing bands on one, for BP mortar/cannon use, I'd use them to reinforce the breech, or the entire length, rather than just the muzzle. Your greatest pressure is not going to be at the muzzle.

The Confederate Brooke guns used 2 shrink fit reinforcing bands, one over the other, at the breech, to contain the heavy BP charges they used.

If you make it air powered and want to run on 3,000 psi, your best bet is to use scuba air or nitrogen instead of oxygen. You couldn't pay me enough to run one on O2.
Running O2 in precharged pneumatic rifles has resulted in the explosion of expensive PCPs.
I've seen pics of a nice Korean Sam Yang, Sumatra, Eun Jin, or Career (forget which) that was blown apart by filling/shooting it with O2.
Yes, I have half a dozen or so 3000 psi 80 cubic feet aluminum tanks as well but was afraid to put something that burns as a propellant in aluminum. I've seen steel 3,000 psi scuba tanks but don't want to buy one to cut up. The steel tanks I have are 72 cubic feet late 1970s vintage, with the + when new and after the first hydro enabling them to legally be filled 10% over pressure. They are not + now but don't have rust in them. When I last dove with them they were doubles used for deeper wreck dives when I had to hang on a line for a decompression stop. I now have MS and am not able to dive anymore, though I have considered shallow 50 ft or less dives. Just no place close where I live that has anything interesting at that depth.
 
Man, as a former M1A1 tank gunner I want to say that firing "cantalope with a sabot" may be a BAD idea... but it HAS to be done now that you've put it out there. I think our service rounds were around $12000 a piece, I bet you can bring it in for less than $20/round with very little residual radioactive hazard.

Air powered?!?! NO!!! PLEASE use black powder (but get some distance) it will be much more spectacular whether it works or not!
 
I get very leary of guys shooting bowling balls out of something not much heavier than stove pipe.

When I was a teen, some guys near Ft Indiantown Gap got an old armature from a hydro turbine of some such thing. It was huge. And just right for firing 1/2 gallon punch cans filled with concrete. Them things would sail a half mile.
 
I have made several 1/3 to 1/2 scale Civil War cannons and used the small v8 tomato or juice cans filled with concrete. Not much BP is needed to have fun. Just be extremely careful and wait a good time between loadings. A wet mop wipe between rounds is a good idea.

Shortgrub
 
Jack, it is a bad idea. The "sho' 'nuf fo' real" bowling ball mortars I have seen have barrel-wall thicknesses on the order of 1 inch or better. I have seen them used to launch a ball over a quarter of a mile.:what:

If you do give in to temptation:evil: to use the HP cylinder material, I humbly suggest you at least bury the contraption with the muzzle maybe 6" below ground level before you fire it (remotely). That way, should there be a "violent dissociation" (read, explosion) of the pressure-containment vessel, at least the surrounding soil would provide some measure of safety from flying bits and pieces of hot metal.

An alternative would be to pile sandbags around it. A better one would be to leave the whole idea in the realm of conjecture.
 
I disagree Acorn Mush, I think he should hold it when he fires it. Stupid SHOULD hurt.







(This is a JOKE. I'm NOT really calling the OP stupid so no one get your undies in a bunch.)
 
I would not run out and try it but it is not a novel idea. They use a very light charge of powder in the things along the lines of using a 12 guage case full of powder to charge. My take is it would be to dern easy to keep pushing the range and then being in the disaster zone.
 
I disagree Acorn Mush, I think he should hold it when he fires it. Stupid SHOULD hurt.







(This is a JOKE. I'm NOT really calling the OP stupid so no one get your undies in a bunch.)
Only you know your motives for posting to a thread. The internet is an imperfect medium for communicating meanings and motives. Lack of face to face eliminates body language.
I anticipated some good natured ribbing with mutual smiles from all including myself. I also anticipated replies from those suffering from little-man syndrome or bully tactics common to school yard 12 year olds, hiding behind anonymity. There are just those in our world who try to boost their own self image by denigrating others.

Only you know which group you belong to.

If I do get motivated, which is doubtful since I have MS, I don't plan on trying to shoot armor piercing sabot rounds like the tanker guy with his Abrams 115. The reason I mention a sabot of some sort was to have a small, relatively light projectile, preferable a vegetable of some sort, encased by a lighter material, such as canned spray foam available in hardware stores, cut in half and formed into a ball, to fill up the bore. That way any powder used would be in drams not pounds, and in small enough amount to just go bang. I've had forth of July fireworks that launched sky burst out of a cardboard tube with about the same size and weight as I'm talking about but without the planned sabot.

By co-incidence, I saw a bit of the show "Weaponology" from times past were a copper/brass tube that looked to be two inches in diameter with a wall thickness of 1/8" and about 6 feet long that was wrapped with leather to a thickness of about two inches of leather and used as a cannon. They fired it in their test several times. Had their powder bag, looked to be about four to six ounces of black powder, attached/tied to another bag of grape shot rammed down the barrel, pricked with a hollow goose quill they had filled with fine black power in it for the fuse and lit the thing with a smoldering rope on a stick. They fired it at a line of plywood men line up like in colonial times. Grape shot is an ugly thing.

My son's paintball gun reaches a velocity of 325 FPM. This was to be my goal, only with a bang instead of a whoosh to get things going.

To the critics, I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT A LARGE POWDER CHARGE SHOOTING A HEAVY, SOLID OBJECT. The speed and fps similar to a paintball gun would be acceptable, only with a tomato wrapped in some material to make the sabot. I'm not looking for something that when landed would damaging something or make a pipe bomb. That is why I gave up on frozen veggies.

Like I said, the idea is more just speculation, food for thought than actual plan. I don’t want to waste that much oxy/acetylene. The driveshaft/tennis ball idea would be a much better plan.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top