What is it With New Guns and Bad Range Days? (RDB Review)

Status
Not open for further replies.

barnbwt

member
Joined
Aug 14, 2011
Messages
7,340
I'll say first off, that ordinarily I'd be steaming mad at the performance I experienced, but so much was going so wrong in so many ways generally, that it couldn't all have been Kel Tec's fault. I'll say second off, that my current favorite rifle --the PS90-- had a similarly tortuous debut* but flawless performance thereafter that only got better. So I'm definitely giving the gun another chance before I start complaining for real. Let's call it an inauspicious start, rather than a failure for the time being ;)

So, the first issue I ran into, as have many others before me, was that the gas was too lean as delivered (this gun is technically used but hardly fired, but the gas valve was fully open for weak cycling). The gas valve is a lot easier to turn than I expected, or would prefer, but didn't manage to move on its own. Because the RDB extracts the spent case over the top of the mag before ejecting, weak cycle force means it stops short, and returns the spent case as well as the next live round into the barrel extension, wedging both in a bizzare and nasty malfuction that utterly ruins both pieces of brass as well as the one bullet (basically breaks the rounds in half). Further, the only remedy is to take the gun apart at the takedown pins to fix it, unless you've got a screwdriver handy to pry with. Naturally, I was too impatient to properly lube the gun before heading out, which surely did not help.

Sounds bad, and it is, but the fact of the matter is that a proper gas adjustment makes it a total non-issue in practice, as I found when I gave it a bit more gas; no more crazy double feeds. Sadly, this was not the end of the malfunctions, however. The other issue with the gun as it is currently, is that it really, really, REALLY does not like USGI mags. 2nd gen P-mags fit like a glove, with a nice positive latch into the mag catch, and no wobble. Metal mags are like a hot-dog down a hallway by comparison, and seem like they stop short against the bolt before the catch fully engages. I think the U-clip mag catch doesn't bow in far enough to properly engage the narrower metal mags, but I don't know if there is an unavoidable reason for this design flaw. The result was the 30rnd aluminum mag I borrowed (a box of ten P-mags arrived at my door during the range trip, but I didn't want to wait) fell out with every shot, and no, it wasn't due to me bopping the release under recoil (it's actually surprisingly hard to hit accidentally unless you really keep your elbow tucked back & up). A 20rnd metal mag worked slightly better, in that it at least stayed in the gun, but suffered near-constant misfeeds. Like I said, both mags felt as though they were hitting the bolt when inserted, but none of the P-mags I tested later on had the same issue.

Comically enough, I got my best strings of fire out of the drop-prone 30 rounder, tea-cupping its baseplate while shooting from a squat position. Actually got pretty reliable hits on a 150yd gong using the SIG red dot sight I'd brought (which worked fine despite some workmanship flaws) from this funky off-hand position. But take my hand off that mag and it'd pop right off before the next round could strip, and I was able to pull it out without hitting the release. Worst part of all this, apart from remembering I'd heard of the USGI mag issue months earlier on the drive home, and finding a new box of P-mags on my doorstep to mock me, was that the RDB came with it's own P-mag, which had hidden itself under the packaging/documentation that came with the rifle. Balls.

The sling Kel Tec supplied is both cheap & strange. Not sure exactly how it's supposed to work, but there's one non-adjustable clasp at on end, and a second clasp that's meant to be moveable inside an adjustment loop secured by two friction buckles & securing links (not sure why you'd need two, though, and the sling is about twice as long as needed). Very crude design you wrap your elbow through once or twice to put some tension on the fore end. I suppose it's just that so few know how slings are supposed to work that we get these straps that aren't good for much besides carrying the rifle in an insecure manner. Makes position shooting a bit easier, which is what I bought the rifle for, but the barrel is not actually free-floated so I'm sure it impacts ultimate accuracy (not that I'm noticing with a red-dot 1X sight). I found that compounding recoil tended to almost knock me over from the squat position, usually the muzzle is far enough out that it balances, so that will take a little getting used to.

Very nice trigger, a very slick hammer design that I'm surprised isn't more common in bullpups. Basically, instead of a complete trigger group the trigger is linkaged to, resulting in a poor trigger pull associated with bullpups, the RDB has a complete trigger/sear/disconnector right at the pistol grip, and instead of the sear releasing the hammer directly, it releases a linkage that is driven by two stout springs to power the remote (U-shaped) hammer at the rear. The hammer also has a 2-3" pivot arm and travel distance, so it truth it acts more like a striker on an incline. Probably not great for lock time, but you get a light, tight trigger with no slop & little over travel to release a powerful striking element a good ten inches to the rear.

One item I've noticed, primarily because of all the dissassembly I've been doing, is that the takedown pins are both a lot stiffer & tighter than is needed (considering they aren't doing anything requiring precision), and that there's three of them. Now, to define a line, you need to points; this is how the AR15, HK G3, and most other push-pin guns work. No matter how those pins get placed, as long as the distance between them is in-spec they'll generally fit the two halves together without drama. But with three pins, three tight pins that go through three separate parts at that (upper, lower, cheek piece/top cover all share pins), it gets really annoying to align the planets so the pin can be tapped through. The fact these parts are sprung against eachother by the return spring assembly makes it even harder; nearly a three-hand operation at times (at others, surprisingly easy). I get the feeling that if the cheek piece were a bit stiffer, they could get away with only two pins & make assembly a lot easier, but the root issue that the front/rear pins are over a foot apart from eachother.

Now, I didn't have the D60 drum pictured with me at the time (it fits as well as the other Pmags, naturally) because it managed to murder itself a couple days before the trip --so much misfortune surrounding this cluster of a range day-- as well as rip off the end of my trigger fingernail (shooting & typing's been fun lately). I won't say it's comfortable, since the inside of wrist does somewhat contact the edge of the drum, but if a 'chicken-wing' hold is used, it's entirely practical to use this mag, and even fully loaded, the balance is very near the shooting hand. Further, the drums are quite reliable so long as you are damned careful when unloading them (screw that, I'll just shoot them dry going forward), so once I rig up a brass catcher to go behind it, I'll have a very handy little carbine that packs quite a lot of firepower into a self-contained package.

So, summary of the Kel Tec side of the equation vs. barnbwt-being-an-unlucky-idiot side of the equation; finnicky on mags, though it seems there are a handful of guns that can only use USGI mags & hate Pmags so maybe that's a wash. Requires a proper gas adjustment ahead of time if you want to avoid obnoxious field service shenanigans, but that kind of goes for most auto-loaders (it's still easier than my FN49, at least). The gun seems solid & pretty well made, up there with an ARX or most ARs, perhaps better, though there are still occaisonal mold-flashes & rough spots like the tight takedown pins. Trigger is quite good for a bullpup, easily competitive with any non-match trigger. Recoil impulse is an odd double-take that reminds me of roller-lock guns, due to the bolt travel being roughly twice as long as usual, which greatly slows down the cyclic speed to where you can detect the bolt returning. Human machineguns will probably have issues with hammer follow during rapid or bump fire, but I'd bet a select-fire variant is quite controllable. Recoil force is quite light, better than a VZ58 or AR70 anyway, and well-damped by the long bolt travel. Muzzle blast wasn't nearly as bad as I'd expect for a bird-cage omni-directional type so close to my face with a 16"-ish barrel. I think a big factor is the foregrip 'flare' near the muzzle blocks a good portion of the concussion, since I did feel it off to the side while my buddy was shooting, but still nothing a simple set of good earmuffs couldn't cure (I usually have to do plugs and muffs with 5.56, but I swear the sound this gun makes is an octave lower or something, and far less obnoxious than most M4geries I've been near)

I think Kel Tec's got a winner here, for sure. There are a few easy and very minor tweaks that need to be, and will be made, but the concept is solid, the execution is pretty solid, and some aftermarket development & OEM accessory support will make it every bit the contender as the Tavor (minus the Israel fanboy stuff; as if Florida Man doesn't have it just as rough as the IDF :D)

RDB.JPG

Now, if you don't believe that this was the Freaky Friday of gun range trips, me & my shooting partner managed to meet constant malfunction in; the RDB, a 6.5 Grendel (this dope brought the wrong bolt-head along), my MP5SD/UMP mutt build which has somehow stopped hitting primers, a belt-fed 9mm upper (they don't like the Geissele triggers), and even a USP40 which was having FTE problems for a mag or two. Several of our optical/iron sights were mysteriously off, and the sand pit constantly blows fine white sugar sand into everything so as to muck stuff up generally. Naturally my 7mm rolling block and K31 were flawless examples of reliability, as always --sometimes I wonder why we bother innovating :rolleyes:

TCB

*Constant malfunction, dot-sight battery failure & horribly misaligned backup 'sights' if you can call them that, double feed that could have caused a kaboom (bullet into primer), charging handle launched down range, and the piece de resistance was pinching my palm between the mag & receiver so badly the gun was hanging from it until I hit the release & raised a nasty 1" long blood blister. Literally *ONE* failure to feed has occurred in the five hundred rounds I've shot subsequently, this using the 10$ Korean knock-off mags
 
Didn't read it all but I would have said "what's it with first dates" many, many, years ago....

It gets better or you take better ones out.
 
Sounds like a range toy, and not a serious use gun.
That's the wrong impression to takeaway; I'm serious about my experience being an incomplete one as of yet. All the ingredients for a quality item (again, like the Tavor) are there, just need to arrange them properly. A proper mag will probably be the cure for what ails at this point, since the gas was quickly dialed in properly (it's pretty nice to be able to modify it easily, I just wish it was an obscuring-type valve vs. the opening type since they adjust more linearly, and had slightly fewer adjustment positions --you've got like a dozen to choose from & it's unnecessary).

It's got a lot going for it, not the least of which is the bolt design, which features KAC-style rounded lugs approximately halfway between AR15 and AR10 in size --perfect for the planned Grendel model to be offered later. The barrel extension is pretty slick in that the take down pin goes right through it, eliminating the need for an upper receiver as strong as on an AR15. Rig up a free float free float front end and even the factory trigger should deliver an exceptionally accurate rifle, but supposedly it's already out-doing some of the competition in accuracy as-is (reports of 1-2MOA). The totally-sealed upper deck of the gun means that gas-face is completely impossible. The mag release is a great concept that just needs a bit more development in my opinion; making the whole thing from a single stamped part seems like a bridge too far even if it saves on cost. The bolt release could also use a more accessible control knob than right above the magwell. At 1200$, any expressly-designed short-stroke 223 rifle made on new parts is a pretty good deal, let alone a bullpup, but the RDB is expected to settle below a grand in the end, putting it in line with generic AR15s. The Tavor is the closest in price, but is still about 4-6 hundred dollars more, the AUG about a thousand. Frankly, the out of production FS2000 is it's only direct competition (223, bullpup, true ambi, short-stroke piston), and runs 2-3 times the cost. That gun also has issues with certain mags yet earned a respectable reputation in the end.

I see this gun selling well & earning respect over the next several years (you have to remember there were only like 300 made until the most recent batch of several thousand in September), and quickly developing an aftermarket for fore-ends, cheek rests, charging handles, and butt pads. The serialized lower design is inherently a bit less modular than an AR (you could maybe do replaceable grips or sear units on a future incarnation, maybe retrofit rock-in AK mags with a new mag latch, but it seems they are comparable as far as the ability to swap out barrel/gas system assemblies for caliber changes, which leaves plenty of room for growth.

TCB
 
It might prove to be a good design, but given Kel-Tec's QC issues and lack of production capacity I won't hold my breath. I hope they iron it out though more choices are always a good thing.

I'm also looking forward the the Desert Tech MDR but it is still vapor ware.
 
From reading on the bullpup forums, it seems like this rifle has already been relegated to "range toy" status simply because its a Kel-Tec. While I would trust an AUG or Tavor simply because of their service history, I'm not such a gun snob that I won't give the RDB a chance. Thanks for sharing your experiences with an interesting rifle, and I hope your second date goes better!
 
I expect new stuff to be perfect. It rarely, if ever is. Once I get over the initial disappointment, there must be fun in sorting things out, or that's what I do anyway. After its sorted, I usually move on to a new "challenge". o_O
With mil-surps the problems have usually been presorted or at least well known, as are the various and sundry solutions.
Out on the bleeding edge of innovation (where Keltec dewlls) it can be extra challenging.
I'm pretty sure it has nothing to do with the Cubs anomaly or the really big political show. :p
 
"I'm also looking forward the the Desert Tech MDR but it is still vapor ware."
Me, too, I suppose. But, considering there's literally zero, zilch, nada, zilcho in the way of evidence it a) exists, b) offers any of the features they are claiming, c) will ever make it to market, I decided to settle for a gun that's here rather than continued delays not to mention rumors the MDR is not nearly as accurate as advertised. Being DT, anyone but the pre-orders (assuming they ever deliver) is gonna be paying like three grand, to boot, and IIRC that company is even lower volume than Kel Tec. Supposedly there's gonna be a 308 RDB one day, though I imagine it'll have an even longer length of pull than the VHS bullpup. The gun I'm actually interested in as an MDR competitor is the K&M M17S, though it's also a low-production item.

"While I would trust an AUG or Tavor simply because of their service history, I'm not such a gun snob that I won't give the RDB a chance."
Pretty much this. The gun is well made --I know it's a Kel Tec, but it's parts quality is up there with my AR stuff. There's no pocket pistol cheapness here, it is legitimately well made-- and has a lot of great features & ideas as always, it just needs reasonable time/experience to be perfected which you can't get pre-market without Uncle Same paying for it. Still, it's been in the wild for about six months, yet I've only heard of three breakages and otherwise it's been glowing reviews (heck, even my gun worked great when the mag was supported, which suggests the solid-locking Pmags will do fine). It's also not like the Tavor's service record hasn't been just *a bit* over exaggerated by the Israeli-arms fanboys since the very beginning (a mere six or seven years ago). Not like that design didn't have a number of flaws that were addressed by future alterations, either, and even some lingering issues yet to be corrected. At least the RDB doesn't spray crud in your face* and has a decent trigger pull. The AUG's primary success has been arms sales from what I've been able to tell, and hasn't featured particularly prominently in combat, though mostly due to the players involved rather than merits or lack of merits (and the continued sales popularity suggests happy enough customers). I don't mean to nit-pick these other excellent designs, but "it's been around longer" is literally the laziest supporting argument there is for a mechanical design ("Kel Tec can't make good stuff" is a better historical argument, but as mentioned, the RDB is something of a quantum leap for Kel Tec as far as quality)

TCB

*Okay, so I always hear about how bullpup shooters or people considering them are paranoid about case failures so close to their face; why are the newer designs like the Tavor and MDR featuring very large receiver openings on both sides of the gun, right near your carotid artery? I personally don't sweat the worries, even the RDB "steel shield" that KT is so proud of in their marketing is thinner than most filing cabinets, and won't provide much in the way of shrapnel protection.
 
Boy was I ever right about this gun! :D

Terrible first trip = fantastic followup

It's funny, the adage applies to both my RDB and my Grendel build (to a much, much lesser extent; still having some extraction problems due to a funky chamber in my 50$ barrel --but it's still about MOA accurate which is fantastic given the price, plus a total hoot to shoot, even single-shot). Brought some Gen 2 Pmags and the D60 drum out to the range today. Not one single failure in any way, whatsoever, in over a hundred rounds (that brass case XTAC FMJ stuff).

I think I'm still in a just-over-baseline gas setting since recoil is very low and the cycle speed is much lower than anything I'm used to (the one-two jostle of the carrier is reminiscent of a roller-lock gun, but the RDB is like half the speed). The gun simply doesn't feel like it's running very hard, though I didn't mess with the setting since there were no issues. I think you'd have a hard time bump-firing due to the slow cycle speed, if you're into that sort of thing. Combination of the respectable trigger, comfortable recoil, and red dot sight meant I was pinging a 20" and 80" gong at 150yds with boring predictability off a table. Can't even tell it's loaded when a Pmag is inserted, since the balance is so unaffected.

What was really surprising was the performance of the D60 drum; I'll do a mini-review of it here, too. First off, it's true what they say about the last ten rounds being a bear to load. As the drum fills, the rounds move closer to the center of the axle, which means it must rotate farther for each round that is added. At the last ten, this rotation is greater than that which is supplied by the folding ratchet handle used for loading (which makes loading the first fifty a cakewalk, btw). That means that two 'cranks' are needed to wind the drum enough to get each of the last ten rounds in. I didn't understand why Magpul bothered with the ratchet mechanism at all until I discovered this (the ratchet is also the cause for all the broken drums out there; if the ratchet is locked and all rounds removed from the magazine, when it is released the guts will accelerate so rapidly the plastic follower will disintegrate when it comes to a sudden stop. Seemed like a glaring weakness for no benefit, but now I see the necessity of the ratchet system to fully load the drum).

Moving on, the drum had exactly zero failures from fully loaded to empty, as did the RDB. Much like the Pmag, the gun's balance was barely effected when the drum was locked in, and surprisingly, when in shooting position neither my nor a friend's wrist was interfering with the drum, certainly not in an uncomfortable or bothersome way. I ran the first several, my friend most of the rest of the drum, and I finished it off. Was pretty sweet hearing the gong ringing for about thirty straight seconds.

My takeaways are; we need an RDB in Grendel, yesterday, and Magpul needs to start making Grendel Pmags. I also decided I just don't care for red-dots all that much even though this one was working admirably (see my Romeo7 review) and next time I'll try a Primary Arms 2.5X prism scope. I've been using irons or dots for the last several years, I'd almost forgotten how sharp, clear, and precise a magnified scope with a proper etched reticle is (I got my start on scopes, but had moved into irons for most of my milsurps/etc since they came with them)

TCB
 
Sticking to the mag issue - used GI mags are notorious for being tweaked, bent, and largely inoperative by the time the get into the hands of the next owner. The risk might only be 10% - but the reason they are often sold is that they became unreliable. Many on the professional side have them crushed beyond recognition when it's proven nothing will fix them.

If the gun works with new ones well it deserves a follow up report. If new GI mags still won't operate properly, then what exists is an out of spec mag well and Kel Tec's inability to fashion it so they do work. I'm inclined to think nicely of them and consider it an open question. Mag well design has been and continues to be the weak link of the Stoner system and to see others copy it slavishly is one of the bigger mistakes of the gun industry. I'm no fan of the AK overall - but it has the best mag design setup of almost any modern rifle. It's exactly the opposite of the flimsy throw away concept of the M16, a basic issue magazine you can't damage even when you try.

Let's not forget that when the six8 became an military issue weapon overseas one of the specific reasons they asked Magpul to design the magazines was that it had a larger magwell to get the design right in the first place. The round needed more room and the mag body did, too, to get enough polymer wall thickness. Now consider a AK style 5.56 mag and mag well - a much shorter well, continuously curved mag to accommodate the slightly tapered round, steel feed lips and a composite body you can stomp on with no damage.

It there is going to be a modern battle rifle to replace the M16/M4, it has to address this shortcoming and do it well. It's not a place to compromise just to save a few ounces. Neither is any self defense firearm using the M16 magazine. If it can't operate with GI mags new out of the box, it's not capable of being trustworthy.

Hopefully further shooting with it shows it can. Otherwise, it's limited and it's value reflects that issue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top