Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

I know you hate opinion threads, but...

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Aaryq, Jul 18, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Aaryq

    Aaryq Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,039
    Location:
    ND Resident, Stationed out of CA, Moving to NC
    Howdy folks. I know you hate opinion threads and complain about them all the time, but I'm curious about a specific post in the Mini-14 Accuracy (again) Thread
    JESMith posts:

    JESmith, this is not intended to flame you, but your posts made the most sense when thinking about gun physics (esp with your bbl comment).

    THR MY QUESTION FOR YOU THR: AR-15 or Mini 14?

    1. I know an AR-15 seems to be good for accuracy out of the box, but the budget would prefer an Mini-14 (I'll be able to afford both, though).

    2. Is a Mini-14 worth the price compared to a decent quality AR-15 if you order a new barrel and trigger job?

    3. I can get a Mini-14 for 400-600 (cheaper than MSRP) on Gunbroker.com. Would you rather get the accuracy out of the box from a $1000-$1500 AR upfront or get a Mini-14 and build it up from a base platform?

    The uses of this rifle would be shooting targets until about 2010 targets and occasionally a few critters 1-2x a year. After that, it will be serving as a truck gun for little critters and bigger critters (coyotes and larger) when I go back to farming (in a hardcase in the farm truck).

    I'm working my ace off at work so I won't be able to reply until about 6:00 pm Pacific time. Reply all you want, but I'll be too busy at work to do more than read and if it lets off, reply a short reply.
     
  2. Alphazulu6

    Alphazulu6 member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    Messages:
    809
    Location:
    Colorado
    Don't worry about opinion threads. Everyone disagrees with everyone but themselves (and even thats debatable) HAHA.

    To answer your question. IF I were to want an AR-15 today I would just order one complete from Rock River Arms. I really do like their triggers as they come complete in a Varmint package for way under your budget (You should pull one for 10-15% off the MSRP from your local gun dealer after he orders it). And of course they do hit sub MOA.

    So thats my cents. Mini's are nice too I would just stick with out of the box because gunsmithing costs can sometimes eat your wallet before you even get it out of your back pocket.

    (A Side Note) You might want to consider the new Panther type .308 that just came out not too long ago. I have seen many posts here and on other sites that claim they are superior. And with the 5.56/.223 ammo drying up I might consider going that route for my next 600m service rifle :D
     
  3. rangerruck

    rangerruck Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    8,374
    Location:
    Texas, baby!
    skip the mini's , they will only make you unhappy, if you ever fire an ar, whether you fire an ar first, or after, you fire a mini. Heck , you can get a complete Olympic arms ar, for 600 bucks nowadays, and you can get a rock river, in the 7's, or even better a Stag.
     
  4. Kaylee

    Kaylee Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    3,749
    Location:
    The Last Homely House
    Even if the accuracy debate about Mini's wasn't at all an issue, the AR family has nigh on forty years of market support - spare parts, experience, magazines, optics, so forth and so on. You could almost certainly get a good AR for the price of the Mini and the mods you're talking about.

    That said, I can certainly see the appeal of the Minis - like the concept of a short, light semi .223 in a sporter stock. But somehow the rifle just never seemed to live up to the promise of the idea, if that makes sense. Anyhow, I've had two over the years, and sold two. I want to like it, but the thing just never grew on me. Take it for what it's worth.

    -K

    edit - just saw you're in CA. Nevermind. The Mini's better than a sharp stick for the next couple years. :)
     
  5. Quiet

    Quiet Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2007
    Messages:
    3,064
    Location:
    bouncing between the 909 & the 702
    Since you are in CA...

    Build an OLL AR-15. It'll be more accurate than a Mini-14.

    If you don't mind the accuracy level of a Mini-14, why not get a RAA Saiga-223 or Kel-Tec SU-16CA? Since, the Saiga would be cheaper than the Mini-14 but have better reliability and the SU-16 would be the roughly the same price as the Mini-14 but you can use AR15/M16 magazines in it.
     
  6. nemoaz

    nemoaz member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2006
    Messages:
    575
    Agreed. I like the looks of the Mini, but the complete lack of accuracy and poor magazine selection (either high cost if you find the ultra-rare factory 30 rounders or sloppy construction for the aftermarket ones) make it a no go for me.
     
  7. rdaines

    rdaines Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Messages:
    191
    Location:
    St. Charles County, Missouri/ Pinal County, AZ
    Never fired a mini but if I wanted a rifle in .223 that was accurate, accessorizable and a semi auto then I pick the AR-15 platform hands down.
     
  8. R.W.Dale

    R.W.Dale Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2005
    Messages:
    11,398
    Location:
    Northwest Arkansas
    For almost the same price of the mini out of the box you can and I did buy a Remington 7615P. They suffer from NONE of the mini's vices and do not require hundreds of dollars worth of gunsmithing and or accessories to shoot good CONSISTENTLY.

    Even if mini's were all super accurate the whole magazine issue would still turn me off to them.
     
  9. mustanger98

    mustanger98 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2004
    Messages:
    2,986
    Location:
    Union County, GA, CSA
    I own a Mini-14 I bought new right before the Y2K Presidential election. I've never run into the accuracy problems.

    The newer ones... mine at least... is a 1:9 twist rate. It shoots 68gr BTHP's quite accurately. Hornady makes a 75gr A-Max and 80gr A-Max... I think I'm fixing to try those and see how they perform with that twist rate. Those are considered expanding hunting bullets.

    The mags can be another story. I have the factory 5rd and it's fine. I got ahold of two 20rd Ruger mags and they're fine. I also got ahold of four 30rd aftermarkets and one of them, the feed lips needed tweaking. But I like those 20rounders real well.

    Would I rather have a Mini-14 or an AR-15? There were plenty of AR's available on that same store's rack when I bought my Mini-14. They'd been trying to push me into buying a AR-15 for six months when I bought the Mini. I like my military rifles and I like my civilian rifles, but I just can't get excited over an AR (and when the threads involve AK's, I can't get excited over them either; for my own use, I just don't care for "black rifles" in general). Does that answer the question?
     
  10. Art Eatman

    Art Eatman Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    43,761
    Location:
    Terlingua, TX; Thomasville,GA
    The Mini is fine for hunting. Odds are, the probability of the first shot going to the intended point of aim is as good as any AR that's box-stock.

    No box-stock Mini will be pleasing as a benchrest target shooter. Tin cans at 50 yards? Plenty good for that sort of plinking. Or jackrabbits to a hundred or so yards, all day long.

    As a "truck gun", I've liked the Minis I've had better than the ARs I've had. I stick some equivalent to a Weaver K4 on top and forget about it. And, I've never given a hoot about mag capacity, other than to say I like the Ruger 10-round mags.

    FWIW, Art
     
  11. Kaylee

    Kaylee Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    3,749
    Location:
    The Last Homely House
    Oh - if you do go for the Mini, may I suggest the stainless/synthetic model? The stainless is nice if you're gonna be leaving it in a truck, and the synthetic stock does handle better I think than the wood. Not quite as chunky, and it's already "checkered." And the conventional rifle stock is just fine, no need for a pistol grip. It's already scary-quick to the shoulder. :)

    Honestly, if I was in CA and wanted a reasonably-priced .223, I'd not be too terribly upset to settle for the Mini. Not my favorite certainly, but it's cheaper than an M14 clone, metal construction*, and still for all its faults a nice handy carbine. And it doesn't need a jury-rigged stock or be halfway dissassembled to stay legal.

    -K


    * the KelTecs might hold up over the generations, but I doubt as well as the Minis. And in CA when you don't know what's going to be banned from sale next, I believe that's an important consideration. In an environ as anti-armed citizenry as CA, I believe the first question when buying any weapon should be "will my grandkids be able to use this?"
     
  12. Aaryq

    Aaryq Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,039
    Location:
    ND Resident, Stationed out of CA, Moving to NC
    Don't worry about CA Legal issues. I will be getting an out of state military assault weapons permit. I can have anything I want.
     
  13. Quiet

    Quiet Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2007
    Messages:
    3,064
    Location:
    bouncing between the 909 & the 702
    Huh? :confused:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page