I notice now most of us older guys (50+)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I am probably one of the truly OLD dudes around that still is an active shooter. I am 77, former Marine weapons instructor and retired cop. Yep, I have done a bit of shooting. I own and shoot "wheel" guns and have hunted with them, but NOW I mostly carry and shoot semi-automatics.

I know the jams and failures of prior years was mostly related to SPRINGS or dirty weapons. The semi-autos of today are much improved and very reliable. I like the versatility of semi's, quick reloading, mag capacity and RELIABILITY. Many of the old guys I know love the ease of inserting magazines into a semi over the FUMBLE FACTOR with revolvers. Arthritis and other issues are not a problem for them when loading, etc.
 
to all,

64YY here w/39+ years "pinned to the badge" & i wouldn't take love or money for my much beloved Sig P6. = it fits me, is always within reach & 9 shots of "9mm flying ashtrays" is just fine with me.

otoh, the handgun that i'd really like to have again was the first duty gun that i wore as a LEO. (unwisely traded it & about a month's salary for a Python in 1966.)= a .38SPL S&W M&P (pre-WWII) for which my mother paid 40.ooUSD (complete with a Sam Brown belt, holster, cuffs/cuffcase & a partial box of ammo), when i was sworn in at a "red hot 18YO" as a Deputy Constable in AR.

yours, sw
 
Last edited:
50+ and I like revolvers. Here are a couple of my newest: an 1847 Walker, and an 1848 2nd Model Dragoon, repros by A. Uberti.

attachment.php
 
63+ here, and I own several pistols, probably more semi's than revolvers, HOWEVER; revolvers have a certain "class" about them that only a few autoloaders have. The other day I was in a gunstore in the mountains, and noticed a 6" model 19 looking at me. $300 and 10 days later, she came home with me to join her family, including a 642, 586,686, Taurus 605, 6" stainless Python, .44 magnum Ruger Blackhawk and the 8" .44 magnum Dan Wesson. There will be others...
 
Last edited:
I got rid of my glock17 here a week ago and I am only going to shoot my 8 revolvers and carry them in order. Mostly ruger speed sixs and my 3 S&Ws from a model 10 in 2 and 4 inch parkerized and a 625-8 in .45 acp and auto-rim
 
Since this discussion has been revived with some gorgeous pictures, I guess I can finally post to it (wish my photos were of the same quality).

I still have a few months before I hit 50, but I do love revolvers. If you don't count the Beretta 92 FS I am holding onto for my son until he turns 21, then 75% of my handguns are revolvers.

Here is my 1995 Ruger SP101, which shares carry duty with the SIG P228:

SP101Hogueleft.gif

And here are my two S&W L frames, a 1985 586 with modified underlug, and a 1997 686:

86s.gif
 
I would LOVE to have a 686 someday. Such awesome guns. For now, I just enjoyed my 629. :)
 
I'm 20 and love my EDC G23.....my best shot right now was 15 rounds through the size a little bigger than a quarter at 10yrds free standing.

But my FAVORITE gun to shoot is my SW617 4" 10shot .22lr :) I could do that alllll day
IMAG0091.jpg

The beauty of 10:)
IMAG0083.jpg
 
I'm 25 and I dislike autos. They just seem... Tacky to me. Also, I'm a film nut. The good guys almost always had revolvers, and the bad guys had autos. Unless it's a Western, and then everyone's a bad guy, and everyone had revolvers.
 
I replied to this thread like a year ago, but it still holds true.
I like revolvers. I acknowledge that many semi-autos are good, reliable handguns and that revolvers can fail.
Having said that, I know beyond a doubt than when I put rounds in the chambers of my revolvers, unless the ammo is bad or the gun flat out breaks, it is going to go off when I pull the trigger. If it fits in the chamber it is going to get loud.
Not all semi-autos inspire the same confidence.
 
I qualify, I'm 50+
if I want to savor the experience, I'll take a revolver
if I just want to put a bunch downrange, I'll take a semi
more often than not, I'll take a revolver because I feel revolvers have far more character
I find it a far more satisfying experience to spend some time with a revolver
 
I'm 23, and my first handgun was a Glock 17. My second handgun was a Ruger LCR.
 
Just one of the "young guns" here at 62.
Our local bowling pin shoots often come down to a few guys with 629, 610 and a 625. The autos sometimes win but more often then not is a good wheel gun that wins. I find I do better with my 6 1/2" 610 than with the Kimber Gold Match.
At the public range with paper, the 686 or 610 punches those tiny groups that the young guys marvel over.
 
I'm 65. I've got revolvers up the kazoo. I was 59 before I got my first auto. I like revolvers plain and simple.
 
I'm 59, did 3 years in SouthEast Asia, some of that as 'the nightime security augmentee at the point of the back fence'. I carried an S&W Model 15, an FM brick radio, and an M-16. Having been a member of a military base Junior NRA program, as a GI Brat, I knew what my GI revolver could do, more so than my 'twangy buttstock spring' M16.

Now, I own 2 Model 15's, and 3 Taurus revolvers, one a Model 82, and two snubbies, Model 905IB first generation, and Model 850. I do own 2 Browning Hi-Powers, too.

I have made the choice to 'leave in the hangar', all but the 2 snubbies., and here is why:
1. I have 5 dedicated missiles to launch at strategic impact points, instead of the
concept of MIRV-deployed missiles, release dependent upon position of launching
tube.
2. I am not the federal government, with disposal funds at my leisure for the procurement of said MIRV missiles in bulk, therefore, I must adhere to the elder USMC train of thought - "One shot, one kill", although acknowledging that 'the Mozambique Drill' might need to be exercised.
3. If you were to watch the 'Dirty Harry' series, and then 'Last Man Standing', the lesson, even though it IS Hollywood, is clear. Putting your launched missiles at the most precise point of aim, or launching multiple missles (more shots were fired than 1911 magazines hold, I've counted them), it is the most precise aimed missile that gets the job done, quickly.
4. The quickness of grasping and aiming a snubbie from its blanket resting spot in the dark, versus the mechanics of readying a semi-auto (even if measured in milliseconds), for an elder person's hand is inherently quicker, and therefore, increases the percentage of survival. Also, you cannot have a touchy trigger in that scenario with a DA snubbie trigger mechanism.
5. I'm an elder fellow. I do not perform ninja movements, with firearm in hand. I stand my ground in the face, literally, of the home thief or invader, or the street thief. I do not have 'time', in operation of semi-automatic mechanisms that just might be at that point, finicky, as they can be.
6. Lastly, as it was on that morning, after the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, broadcast live across the country, the best advertisement for a snubnose revolver ever occured, better than the old Timex watch advertisements, proving that a lowly old delapidated design (as the new kids with the tupperware plastic banana pistols think) .38 Special lead no-hollow-point bullet will bring down a human being, when properly delivered.
 
Own both revolvers and autos. First gun was an S&W M28 back in 1975. Second gun was a Colt Combat Commander back in 1976. Twenty-five pistols ago...Carry a snubbie revolver and two speed loaders 95+% of the time and an auto (SIG P239 or Cbt Cdr) if I think I'm gonna need "more" shots and to reload quickly. Sooooo many choices....ain't it great
 
53 & shoot both

I think both have their place.

I use a 9mm or .40 when shooting action pistol or IDPA.

I use a revolver when shooting PPC.

My carry is a .40 Taurus PT940 my wife's carry is a Smith Bodyguard .38.

The only time I had a complete failure was with a Taurus PT99 and the lug on the bottom of the barrel broke in a match.

Taurus replaced the barrel and I had the pistol back in 5 days.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top