Legionnaire
Contributing Member
Great way to make the "point!" Good job!
That was a very good illustration and your lucky that you were talking to someone who had an open mind.
Unfortunately there are many ignorant people who would have still discredited your entire presentation.
So you would be no danger to others even if you had access to a bazooka while some people are dangerous with a Bick pen?
There are plenty of people who consider themselves "open-minded" because they have certain weird, irrational beliefs and justify them with good intentions, but I've found that such people can be the most closed-minded individuals around because they only hear what they want to hear and refuse to think logically.
And no idiot ever got mad at his wife and ran to Wal-Mart to buy a Sharpie to kill her.
No 6 year old is able to kill another with a ball point pen negligently left lying around. It doesn’t happen often with guns, but it happens. Once is too often.
yep i smell smoke great jobGeeez! Don't ya just HATE logic???
Way to go!
What is the purpose of a gun? Why were they invented, and why do we constantly refine and make them ever more efficient? What are they for?
Well, lots of reasons, of course. Target shooting, competition, collecting, self defense, intimidation (lets hope by police and soldiers), hunting, and so on.
But the real reason they were invented and still exist, the reason that overwhelms all others, the reason we carry them, and the reason too many gun-folk go to ridiculous lengths to deny, is that guns make for easier, faster, and more efficient purposeful killing than anything else commonly available, once that decision is made.
Pretending they are in any way whatever equivalent to ball point pens, cars, chainsaws, knives, ball bats, and whatever else is nonsense. Are all of these things used to kill? Sure. But none can hold a candle to a gun.
Guns are in a class of efficient lethal power all their own – that’s why we invented them and we keep making them better, and that’s why we, and LEOs, and soldiers all carry them. Soldiers don’t carry ball-pens or ball bats – when they need to kill they intend to be the best.
The teacher will of course quickly realize this and again believe she was right all along. Guns are deadly and dangerous weapons, widely available, and expand exponentially the power of the holder, for good or ill. The guns in the hands of the benign give her no comfort, and guns in the hands of the criminals and other trash terrify her, especially if she watches much news.
A couple of other things the teacher will soon realize:
No 6 year old is able to kill another with a ball point pen negligently left lying around. It doesn’t happen often with guns, but it happens. Once is too often.
And no idiot ever got mad at his wife and ran to Wal-Mart to buy a Sharpie to kill her.
Most here won’t like it or admit it, but we pay a serious price in innocent human life to remain an armed and relatively free people. There is no value in trying to minimize or smokescreen that cost. I believe our best long term hope for keeping that freedom is to find ways to virtually eliminate that cost. Nearly everywhere else has failed, and they have already lost it.
Apparently though some burglars do in fact go out buy themselves a pen to do an "armed" robbery:And no idiot ever got mad at his wife and ran to Wal-Mart to buy a Sharpie to kill her.
Though, if as may people were killed with melee or improvised weapons as are with firearms there would be a burden of regulation (justifiably).
It is a false equivalence to compare any other weapon to a firearm.
Wana Bet?
Here is a preview of what's to come after gun control. Apparently there is no limit to how far governments will go to ensure their monopoly on the use of force even if it means rendering the population defenseless. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-storie ... -20644126/