Idaho Teens Tote Loaded Guns Around Town Legally

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ukraine Train

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2003
Messages
1,232
Location
Cleveland
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,274138,00.html

Idaho Teens Tote Loaded Guns Around Town Legally

Sunday, May 20, 2007

POST FALLS, Idaho — Two home-schooled teenagers in this northern Idaho town say they are carrying loaded guns to the library, grocery store and other public areas for self-defense, as a crime deterrent, and to educate others about their rights.

Zach Doty, 18, carries a loaded Glock handgun on his hip. His 15-year-old brother, Steven, carries a .22-caliber rifle in a sling on his back.

Police have been called on several occasions to question the teens but have not found the teens to be in violation of the law.

In Idaho, residents 18 and older can openly carry a firearm in public. And those ages 13 to 17 who have parental permission can carry a rifle in public.

"I certainly don't anticipate that I'll need to use it, but I'd rather have it and not need it than to not have it and need it," Zach told the Coeur d'Alene Press. "There's no reason for me to hide a weapon."

Zach was stopped April 17 on his way to Bible study. On Friday, police again responded when someone reported the brothers with guns in a park. But police left after confirming it was the Doty's.

Zach has also been approached by others.

"There have been good opportunities to speak to people," he said. "I make sure they know that open carrying is legal, why I carry and I encourage them to consider doing so themselves."

The brothers carry their weapons to parks, the library, grocery stores and other places. They can't have their guns with them on school property, courthouses or jails.

Not everyone is comfortable with armed teenagers in the neighborhood.

"I turned back so that my wife could verify what I saw," said James Rebal, who called police after seeing Zach with his gun. "He was very nicely dressed and I saw nothing to be concerned about other than the weapon. It's not something you see in Idaho. Virginia Tech was fresh in my mind, and I thought it was better to err on the side of concern."

A lone gunman killed 32 people and himself last month at Virginia Tech University.

John Dunlap, commander of the American Legion Post 143, said he asked Zach to leave the Legion at a recent lunch because Zach was carrying his gun.

"He left and came back the next day (without the gun) for soup," said Dunlap, who described the brothers as "well-mannered."

Ed Santos owns Center Target Sports in Post Falls and is a gun safety instructor. He said the Dotys came to his shop but he doesn't sell handgun ammunition to people under 21.

He said that just because the Dotys are carrying guns in public doesn't mean they're not responsible with them, but questioned the need to carry them in town even though it was legal.

"My advice for them is the same as it is with adults — yes it's your right and yes it's legal, but why draw unnecessary attention to yourself just because you can?" Santos said. "I believe the intent (of the law) was to allow it more for hunting and recreation."

Zach said he's not paranoid or a radical.

"If I was an extremist, our founding fathers would all be extremists," he said. "Without them, we wouldn't have our independence. We'd be a disarmed British system of feudal subjectivity."
 
They've got more guts than I do. I know it'd frighten the sheeple if I carried my SKS slung across my back that way. Good for them!
 
"I turned back so that my wife could verify what I saw," said James Rebal, who called police after seeing Zach with his gun. "He was very nicely dressed and I saw nothing to be concerned about other than the weapon. It's not something you see in Idaho. Virginia Tech was fresh in my mind, and I thought it was better to err on the side of concern."
...and that in a nutshell is the problem with people's perception. Clearly, to us, Mr Cho did NOT go around with his sidearms strapped on in open carry. The hard thing to do is to get people to understand that having a gun is inherently different from being a homicidal maniac.
 
People don't understand that the gun you can see is almost never the problem
 
I think it was the Ohio AG website that indicated thet even though one can open-carry, he or she may well end up being arrested for "disturbing the peace"?! Who's peace?

Good for these kids! No body, and I mean nobody would have thought twice about seeing me walk around with my hunting rifle when I was 17ish (1977).

Frankly, I believe concealed carry is not near as advisable as open carry. I prefer open-carry.
 
a second thought..

So James Rabal turned his car around and drove back so his wife could see... Then he was concerned enough about another VT that he called the cops... WHY THE HECK WOULD HE DRIVE BACK IF HE WAS SCARED OF THAT???

It just seems like this individual has as much common sense as well... Not much. :scrutiny:
 
I used to run around with a Remington 700 bdl on my back on my bicycle and no one batted an eye. The world has changed alot since the 70s.
 
Santos said. "I believe the intent (of the law) was to allow it more for hunting and recreation."

Remind me not to hire this guy to interpret the law for me.
 
Quote:
"I turned back so that my wife could verify what I saw," said James Rebal, who called police after seeing Zach with his gun. "He was very nicely dressed and I saw nothing to be concerned about other than the weapon. It's not something you see in Idaho. Virginia Tech was fresh in my mind, and I thought it was better to err on the side of concern."

...and that in a nutshell is the problem with people's perception. Clearly, to us, Mr Cho did NOT go around with his sidearms strapped on in open carry. The hard thing to do is to get people to understand that having a gun is inherently different from being a homicidal maniac.

This is exactly why I harp on people to not use Weapon to describe just any gun, unless it is actually intended for use as a weapon.

Doesn't matter if they like it or not, but if shooters want to continue gaining ground, we need to win the battle of public perception AND the battle of legislation.

Seperating recreational guns and shooting from an automatic assumption of violence will never happen unless public perception is changed.
 
10-Ring it's a common human trait. The phrase used to summarize it is, "misery loves company". The phenomena is that people who are weak or suffering attempt to draw down others to their plight, for whatever reason. On liferafts at sea a man or woman about to die invariably makes an attempt to pull the drain plug or capsize the vessel as their last act. It's an unpleasant aspect of human nature, which the Founding Fathers undoubtedly understood.

"Those kids are acting like free men! Let's bring them down."


Does anyone have a mailing address for them, because they deserve fan mail. A guy in Ontario up here did the same sort of thing, obeying the law transporting an unloaded rifle to a shooting range on his back while riding a motorcycle, and when the police busted into his house half the Canadians cheered them on because he was a ****-stirrer.
 
There was a time when carrying in public was the rule, rather than the exception. I guess not relying on a gun to eat (as my dads family, along with many others, did during the depression) dulls your sense of their utility. Nowadays all that gets publicity is their use in tragedys, thanks to our media.:fire:
 
Eloquent

"If I was an extremist, our founding fathers would all be extremists," he said. "Without them, we wouldn't have our independence. We'd be a disarmed British system of feudal subjectivity."
This from an 18-year-old.

Dude!

Home schooled.

You would flat NEVER hear that paragraph from a publik skool grajuate.

Let's see . . . Post Falls . . . that's right by Coeur d'Alene. That there's Northern Idaho, just across the border from Spokane.

Lovely country.

Open carry.

What's not to love?
 
You would flat NEVER hear that paragraph from a publik skool grajuate.

Probably not because it seems many currently public school students don't care about US history. They're under the impression that the US was founded around the same time that the Rolling Stones were founded. George Washington is still alive, but old.... and the civil war was fought by the bloods and crips.

I asked my cousin the other day some basic US history questions - she's 15. She couldn't answer any of them. She said that she didn't care about it and didn't listen in class because she figures she's not going to become a lawyer, so why does it matter?

:rolleyes:

her sister did the same thing.... and I've seen plenty of others too.
 
You would flat NEVER hear that paragraph from a publik skool grajuate.

It's ok, but not entirely correct from a grammatical point of view--the kid still needs to learn the proper use of the subjunctive mood. That is, the correct way to say it is "If I were an extremist, our founding fathers would all be extremists."



He does understand early U.S. history, though!


:evil:
 
Last edited:
My hats off.....

to these young gentlemen. Having the guts to stand up for whats right. :):D:) good for them.
 
I live about 40 miles from Post Falls. This was front page news in our local paper - The Coeur d'Alene Press - so my co-workers who label me as a "gun nut" engaged me in coversation regarding this issue. And it has been great teaching them about open carry, RKBA, 2A, etc. I've actually been able to enlighten a few folks about it and thanks to these well-spoken "kids" I've been able to open the eyes of a couple antis I work with and have some pretty decent and rational conversations.

Question: strategically it doesn't seem very bright if you're open carrying for self-defense. yes?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top