DKSuddeth
Member
So, consider this: The 2nd is "repealed"--like prohibition was. All legal like? Now your arguments of "sworn to protect" mean you have to participate in the confiscation. (This is just all theory and hypothetical--just an exercise in imagination)
considering the requirements to amend the constitution, i don't ever foresee that happening. The only way for government to 'infringe' on firearm ownership is to violate the constitution.