A company actually makes the exact same guns so your point is null.Edited my original remark. I'm not going to play this game.
Kiln, snide comments serve no purpose.
If you dissagree with something I've said, then say so. Don't be passive aggressive.
If you don't like that most people would agree that ROF guns are considered poor choices for a SD gun, that is your right. So start a thread supporting this idea and talk about it. I'm sure some people will agree with you, and you can have a nice conversation. Just coming in here and saying "It's the magazines" doesn't make ROF guns better though.
By the way:
(Continuing the conversation now)
I agree, you can make any gun, or any machine for that matter, run reliably with enough time, effort, work, and money. But, what's your point? How does that make a poorly made gun that is unreliable from the factory, and may have questionable durability, anything other than what it is? Now it is a reliable poorly made gun that may have questionable durability. If you enjoy fixing up beaters, then enjoy. The bottom line is that it is still a questionable choice, and if you walk into a LGS or chain, trying to sell a Jenning's, and say "Yeah it's a Jenning's, but I did a bunch of work on it and it is reliable as all get out." The person behind the counter is still going to think "It's still a Jenning's"
There is a reason they aren't still in business.
Jennings was shut down by ridiculous lawsuits stemming from negligent use of their guns back when anybody could press charges against the manufacturer when a gun was used in a crime.
I'm not saying that a cheap gun is ideal but they can be good enough.
And just to clarify, larger caliber ROF guns have serious durability issues. The .22 and .25 versions though can last a long time and can be reliable by anyone with even a moderate understanding of how firearms work.