Immigration War to Begin November 2005

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ezekiel said:
Say what you will: I railed against beer-swillers (like myself), too. Besides, any so-called driving sport that merely involves turning left is LAME. That's not elitist, that's truth.

You, sir, are a fool and an elitist racing biggot. You probably even think stagger has something to do with the cheep beer you swill.

Go crew on a sprint car for a while and come back and tell us how lame it is.

Just go ahead and tell someone who got a bad case of red eye from crashing his sport is lame.

Insults are down the hall.
 
The moment they become $6 an hour jobs to illegal mexicans who suck off the govt teat in one form or another (or many), thus making up for the loss in wages. Their parasitical employers profit at the expense of the taxpayer. So Jammer Six, are you a parasitical employer of illegals? Are you honest enough to answer either way?
Biker
 
You, sir, are a fool and an elitist racing biggot. You probably even think stagger has something to do with the cheep beer you swill.

Oh my. "Touched a nerve, did I?"

First, "I drink GOOD beer." Second, "stagger" involves minimizing an automobiles ability to function as an automobile and turning it into a counter-clockwise troglodyte. Truly sir, enjoy your left-turning corporate shell game.

Just go ahead and tell someone who got a bad case of red eye from crashing his sport is lame.

"Your sport is lame." (Presuming it involves reducing the turning ability of a given automobile by 50%.) See how easy that was?

Insults are down the hall.

"Then you may begin walking." I'm staying here.

To get back to the point:

There's something deeply ironic about a statement like this on a forum dedicated to self-protection.

May I ask why? In all seriousness -- as opposed to my somewhat sarcastic comments above -- I was not aware that hardcore, selfish, self-righteous and "personal" protectionism was the ultimate key to the RKBA. Frankly, I think it should definitely be abridged for some individuals. Noting that, how can such a statement be ironic?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top