Trumpetman wrote: "If I had bought the .357 magnum revolver first, I probably would never have bought a 9mm pistol."
I agree with Trumpetman. Some years ago I jumped on the semi-auto wagon for concealed carry without seriously considering a revolver. I regret it. I, too, would have far less 9mm semi-autos if I had studied the .357 Magnum revolver.
Now, I have two early 1980's production Ruger Speed-Six .357 Magnums with the 2.75" barrels. One blued and the other stainless. The balance is great, triggers are smooth, targets out to 25 yards are easy prey in double-action, and recoil is manageable. Bought both used and both had some cosmetic damage from where prior owners tried to destroy them...and failed. A testament to their ruggedness. The blued version is my beside-gun loaded with some nice 125 grain ammunition. The stainless, because I live in the muggy, sweaty South, is my carry gun.
I am not a big guy...5' 6" if I stand up straight. But, with a nice pancake or in the waistband holster I can conceal the gun quite easily. There are exceptions...but, not often.
Anyway, simplicity, versatility, and firepower had a lot to do with my "conversion". They are just, by nature, an easier gun to use. No tap and rack, stove piping, FTE, FTF. There is a wide range of ammunition out there. They pack a punch even with standard, locally supplied ammunition. There are days that on the way home from work I decide to stop off in my favorite neck of the woods. And, if I want something besides my self-defense load I just reach in the dash and pull out my hard-cast, flat-nosed 180 grain ammunition. I am feel prepared for pretty much anything in the Southeast U.S.
The .357 Magnum revolver fits my lifestyle.
P.S.
I have 2 Dan Wesson .357 Magnums with 6" barrels and a Marlin 1894c. Which adds even more to the .357 Magnum versatility. This round is here to stay for many years in my home.