Is the revolver enough for defense?

Status
Not open for further replies.

357smallbore

Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2015
Messages
893
Location
Leavenworth KS
I cut my teeth shooting 38 Specials, 357 Magnums and 44 Magnums. I love all my revolvers. I really love shooting my 1976 Ruger Single Six.
I currently carry a Speed Six (6 shot) or my Rossi 720 (5 shot) for ccw. I also carry one speed strip for each.
I don't ever feel that I'd be under gunned or short on ammo if I had to defend myself.
I have hi cap semi's and I love to shoot em. But they are not what I prefer to ccw. Although I occasionally carry my S&W Shield in 9mm.
Anyone feel you need more than a cylinder full from a revolver for self defense?
 
I cut my teeth shooting 38 Specials, 357 Magnums and 44 Magnums. I love all my revolvers. I really love shooting my 1976 Ruger Single Six.
I currently carry a Speed Six (6 shot) or my Rossi 720 (5 shot) for ccw. I also carry one speed strip for each.
I don't ever feel that I'd be under gunned or short on ammo if I had to defend myself.
I have hi cap semi's and I love to shoot em. But they are not what I prefer to ccw. Although I occasionally carry my S&W Shield in 9mm.
Anyone feel you need more than a cylinder full from a revolver for self defense?
Confidence is worth more than capacity. Hits count more than misses. Would you get more hits with a revolver? Only you can answer that.
 
Confidence is worth more than capacity. Hits count more than misses. Would you get more hits with a revolver? Only you can answer that.
Yup, confidence and competence will get you through many situations.

While it is true that I have never interviewed any officer who was in a gunfight who wished that he carried fewer rounds, I will also say that every one fell back on their training when the instinct to respond to a deadly threat kicked in. Practice how you can, when you can and you'll be better served than just buying a 17-shot pistol and heading out without practice.

Stay safe.
 
Maybe if you only have a 5 shot revolver subconsciously you’ll shoot better. If your carrying 17 round bottom feeder maybe your be more spray n pray in a gunfight. I dunno. I only have ever had a single stack 1911 or a wheeler CCW. I can hit with both. Wheelgun is my new preference
 
Anyone feel you need more than a cylinder full from a revolver for self defense?

It took me a long while to decide that, yes, I might need more than a full cylinder. And, no, I didn't want to find out the hard way that 6 was not enough.

I Glocked myself in .357 SIG flavor. And practiced til I was as good with them as with my revolvers (with regards to practical SD shooting).
 
My Dad owned 2 handguns in his 93 years on earth ..The first was a S&W pre-model 10 the other was a 3 inch barreled model 36 ..
At my Dads passing my brother got the pre-Model 10 , I got the 36 ... my Dad felt comfortable with his revolvers ...
I can’t say he was a expert.. But he was a pretty good shot .. The Pre -Model 10 was his favorite
He purchased it used in 1945 and the 36 new in 76?
 
I carried a charter undercover for years. Felt confident. My grandpa carried the same thing since 1982 when he bought it. The way I look at is when your time is up it's up. Doesn't matter what you are carrying. But that's just me.
 
The last guy I had to shoot laughed at me when I pulled out my .357 revolver. He said son your going to need more than 6 rounds to do me in. You should have brought a 19 round auto with you. I unloaded my 6 shots into him and he was correct. I needed more bullets. He proceeded to kill me and I am now writing this from heaven.
 
I do NOT want to be shot, not even with a BB gun. Most other SANE people feel the same way.

We all talk about it, but it is rare that a civilian pulls a weapon and if they do that they fire more than 3rds.

So, yes I am fine with a revolver. I trust my skill and do not think it likely that I will be attacked by 2 people at the same time and if I am that the 2nd one will continue the fight after the 1st is shot.

In the end though, do what lets you sleep well at night. I would prefer an M4 with me at all times but that isn't practical nor legal in most places.
 
Unless I'm facing a "Banzai" charge. I totally feel comfortable and confident that the rounds I have are enough.
I'm not going to put myself in a situation that a group of hood rat teens are going to assault me or go cruising the hood asking for trouble.
I agree with what being said here. It's practice and familiarity with your weapon.
 
The problem is, WE don't control the situation -- the people who plan to attack us do. They choose the time and place and the odds.

Jeff Cooper pointed out that there is such a thing as "enough ammunition" and there is such a thing as "NOT enough ammunition." There is no such thing as "too much ammunition." So since I don't know what will happen when I turn the next corner, I carry a couple of spare magazines.
 
Those of us who opt to carry firearms for self defense live our lives on very, very small probabilities. Is a wheel gun enough? yes...no...maybe...who knows.

The probability of needing any gun to defend yourself is incredibly small. The probability that you will need to show that you are armed with more than a stern word to stop an attack is smaller. The probability that the flash, report, or realization of pain/injury doesn't stop an attack is even smaller. Etc.

Now I get it. Its not the odds, its the stakes. I agree. I carry a firearm and know how to use it so that I can be better prepared than 95% of others in a 1:100,000 situation. However, and this is just a gut feel, my guess that short of a person with a dangerous job like a LEO or lifestyle where violence may be needed to survive, the number of cases where someone was armed with only 5 shots and needed 17 and ended up seriously wounded or dead because of it is probably incredibly low to the point of being a statistical insignificance.

I am not meaning to sound like I'm blowing off carrying more firepower. I don't feel it to be foolish nor a waste to bring enough to end any fight. However, I don't look down on those who choose not to carry 120 rounds on their person to walk the dog in their suburban neighborhood.

For me, its perspective. About 8 years ago a Subway got knocked over in the middle of the day by a couple of guys with a gun. It sits literally next door to where my daughter was going to day care. I rethought my .380 6+1 , because if it could happen in broad daylight on the non-rough side of town, well I better get me a 10+1 G26 and be sure. Here's the thing: in 8 years time since then I can't recall one robbery so brazen on this side of town. I would guy about 75,000 folks live in this part of our small 115,000 person city. Crime, yes. Shootings, yes. Robberies, yes. Daylight smash and grab? No. The other 6 rounds in my Glock made ME feel better and more prepared a situation that I had no reason to feel ill prepared for. I have never been in that Subway and my daughter's daycare was locked down.

I'm a healthy 39. Physically fit with no medical issues. However, at the present, I am probably more likely to meet my maker by not washing my hands well than needing more than 5 beans in the wheel.

I carry 7 rounds of. 357 or .45 acp and a .22 mag NAA in my off hand pocket. They aren't that cumbersome to pack so I do, but I don't freak out if I go out without them.
 
This discussion will eventually turn to a comparison of a highly trained old timer with his 5 shot revolver being way better than the untrained kid with his Glock 17.

A person can have both. Train consistently with a reliable, high capacity auto loader and you will be able to defend against more bad guys than if you had a low capacity gun. (Miculek not included in this comparison)
 
This discussion will eventually turn to a comparison of a highly trained old timer with his 5 shot revolver being way better than the untrained kid with his Glock 17.

A person can have both. Train consistently with a reliable, high capacity auto loader and you will be able to defend against more bad guys than if you had a low capacity gun. (Miculek not included in this comparison)

This is exactly the conclusion I came to. I was better with my revolvers than with semi-autos. I think many of us choose to believe that the gun that fits us and that we shoot well, is the gun we should have and carry.

But the greatest strength of human beings, is the ability to learn and adapt. We can improve our abilities with firearms we don't naturally shoot well. We simply have to decide to do so.
 
From the point of view of an average guy that has never (Thank Heaven) had to point my weapon at another human being intent on doing me harm -

It has become more reasonable to me over all these years that each citizen needs to honestly ordain what they shoot best.

And then practice every scenario possible.

JMO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top