It is official: Most Californians are completely insane and/or mentally retarded

Status
Not open for further replies.

Beethoven

member
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
404
My rant:

It is official; California just declared to the world, loud and clear, that most of California's residents are either completely insane, mentally retarded, or both.

Let's start with Prop. 73, which would have required parental consent/notification before a minor could have an abortion.

How anyone can possibly argue against that is beyond me. There IS no valid argument against this.

I am speechless that anyone could think it is a good thing for a MINOR (as in people under 18 years of age) to be able to get an ABORTION at will without their parents knowing.


Next, Prop. 74 which would have made it easier to fire tenured teachers and made it more difficult for teachers to get tenure.

Again, I fail to see how anyone could argue against this.

First, I do not see the purpose of "tenure." It should not exist. If someone could explain the reason for its existance to me, I'd appreciate it, though I doubt any valid reason exists.

Gee, let's NOT make it easier to fire bad teachers, and let's keep it simple for teachers to become tenured so that we cannot fire them if we so choose.

Great idea!

Next we have Prop. 75 which would have required labor unions to get express written consent from their members before using their money for political purposes.

Most teachers, unfortunately, are leftists, and the California Teachers Association alone spent around $60 MILLION dollars on this election. All said and done, teachers unions dropped about $100 MILLION dollars on this election.

That's a tenth of a billion dollars.

That's a lot of freakin' money.


Prop 76 would have placed a cap on state spending.

This is the one that really blows my mind. Gov. Davis was recalled in large part because of his tripling of the car tax.

We put Arnold into office in order to change things, and he started by repealing the car tax.

Now we have voters saying that they do NOT oppose more spending by the government.

CA voters are more fickle than a 16 year old on prom night, and that's being polite.

They simply cannot be pleased. Spend more, spend less. Tax more, tax less. Control spending, spend like a drunken idiot.

Again, my assertion that CA voters are mentally deficient is supported by the results of this election; they are so inconsistent, and their flagrant inconsistency is indicative of a dysfunctional mind.


Next we have prop. 77 which would have taken power AWAY from our communist legislature and instead let a panel of three retired judges draw district lines, and if I heard correctly, new district maps would have to be approved by the voters of CA.

I was not too sure either way on this one, but I did vote for it.

With how CA voted in this election, I'm glad it failed. I wouldn't trust the average CA voter to find her way out of a paper bag, let alone approve legislative district maps.


Finally, we have prop. H in San Francsico, that paradise for perverts.

Prop H would ban the manufacture, distribution, sale and transfer of firearms and ammunition within San Francisco, and ban City residents from possessing handguns within San Francisco.

I'm preaching to the choir here, so I'll spare you my comments, I'm just stupefied that it passed, especially with what seemed like pretty substantial opposition, even from SF's communist newspapers. (Yes, you read correctly: The SF chronicle opposed the gun ban. No, I cannot believe it either.)


CA voters proved to the world yesterday, November 7 2005, that they are absolutey, 100%, certifiably mentally retarded. There is no sound logical, factual defense for each of those propositions failing and for Prop. H passing.

I am ashamed to be a Californian, and the results of yesterday's election only brings more truth to my statement when I say to people, "I don't live in America; I live in California."

This statement could not be more accurate and correct: I do NOT live in America, I live in California.

I truly hope that the San Andreas Fault blows up and rips the diseased left coast from my state.

Good Lord God, how badly we need it.

Sorry folks, I needed to rant.
 
I am speechless that anyone could think it is a good thing for a MINOR (as in people under 18 years of age) to be able to get an ABORTION at will without their parents knowing.
Without getting into any moral/ethical/religious aspects of abortion... As John Ross has pointed out, you cannot give a minor a Tylenol, remove a mole, or any thing other than what is minimally required in an emergency to save their life without not only notifying a parent, but also getting their permission. Abortion has become a sacrament to liberals.


IBTL
 
Can't disagree with anything you've said Beethoven.

It'll be interesting to see if any THR'r does.
 
Henry Bowman said:
Without getting into any mral/ethical/religious aspects of abortion... As John Ross has pointed out, you cannot give a minor a Tylenol, remove a mole, or any thing other than what is minimally required in an emergency to save their life without not only notifying a parent, but also getting their permission. Abortion has become a sacrament to liberals.


IBTL


That's what I thought, and I was going to add it into my rant, but I wasn't sure.

Thanks for the support guys....I need it.... :(
 
roll over, Beethoven

And what will you be saying when Hillary's elected President?

You've discovered that there are a lot of ignoramuses out there. Congratulations.

And now...?
 
First, I do not see the purpose of "tenure." It should not exist. If someone could explain the reason for its existance to me, I'd appreciate it, though I doubt any valid reason exists.
At the K-12 level, you're quite right, it doesn't make any sense when the curriculum is laid out by the school board or state. Tenure originally came from universities, and has to do with research. Something K-12 teachers never do.
 
The no votes on these propositions wasn't about the props themselves, it was a protest vote, against the GOP national agenda....dems won in VA and NJ,(not unexpected), a pennsylvania school board that wanted to teach intelligent design was swept out of office en masse..
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1638584,00.html

I think we're seeing the beginnings of a republican/evangelical christian backlash. And yes, I voted no on the whole slate.
 
I have an uncle who watched with dismay the California of Wyoming. He said that in his part of the world the locals want to meet Calif refugees at the border, give 'em water and food and a little rest, then gut shoot 'em and send 'em back.

A little rough but maybe he's on to something.
 
Well, I voted against all of 'em, <garbage removed by Art>, Beethoven :p Your spin is full of half truths, innuendos and erroneous conclusions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
seansean said:
The no votes on these propositions wasn't about the props themselves, it was a protest vote, against the GOP national agenda....

Yep, that's what happened. They might have been opposed to one of them, but decided not to give Arnold a victory on any of them - block voting.
 
I have the ugly suspicion that the leftists purposefully want to bankrupt the state. Then they can tell the local sucklings that the budget problem is not the social programs spending and criminal mismanagement, but Prop 13. They will get the rabble riled up against it just as they did just now against Aanold and then they will repeal it.

What the statist idiots do not understand is the end of Prop 13 will not solve any problems, only provide a short temporary patch to their green-addiction problem. The property prices will drop exactly because of the added burden of taxation, so in the end the statists will get exactly the same. The only losers in this game will be the property owners who will have to sell at deflated prices because they would not afford the tax.

Finally, what the commie idiots do not understand is that the damage will be done to the middle class, rather than their favorite class-struggle targets. Well, maybe the few smart ones among the commies want exactly that - destroy the middle class to proletariatize the populace against the class enemy. Countries with weak or non-existent middle class inevitably reach revolution and commie dictatorship (e.g. Russia 1917, China 1940s), or brutal corrupt plutocratic dictatorships (banana republics in Latin America and Africa). :barf:
 
Looks we, the sheepdogs, are getting screwed by the sheep.
The wolves now have free reign in S.F.

I just really hope that this BS does not spread like an infection
thru the rest of the state.

I don't want to move to another state, but if this &%& keeps
up I may very well have to.
 
Jay Kominek said:
At the K-12 level, you're quite right, it doesn't make any sense when the curriculum is laid out by the school board or state. Tenure originally came from universities, and has to do with research. Something K-12 teachers never do.

My understanding is that the tenure system exists at a universtiy level to allow professors to engage in a free interchange of ideas without have to be afaid that they would be subject to sanction from the administration for discussing unpopular ideas. The tenure process usually requires that the work of the aforemention professor was know to the department and that they had a track record of some academic acheivement and tenure served as a reward to original thinkers to encourage them to to continue to think originally or as a reward for previous original thought. Even in a tenure system, you can still remove a professor, the bar is just higher. There really is no need for a tenure system in grade school as the idea is to teach children the fundamentals that will be built upon later. In fact, too much exposure to contreversial thought might be counterproductive as the children might not be mature enough yet to place things in the proper context.

(at least that's my understanding)
Kj
 
The left wing infestation

:cuss:Yesterday set the stage. The left in California is reaching for the lever on the toilet an is getting ready to flush the state once and for all. The results of this election show that there is no hope. The infestation is too deep and cannot be cured. Too much government dependance amoung the masses. It will soon be worse than france.:barf:
 
Savage was right - Liberalism really is a mental disorder, and a self-destructive one as well.
 
It's hard to formulate any rational argument with Beethoven's post, but "rational" doesn't describe California politics or the majority of California voters.

As far as people protesting Arnold or the GOP agenda . . . well, since he signed the .50 ban I wouldn't support Arnold either . . . even though I don't have a .50 or particularly want one.

As for the GOP agenda, at least at the national level, it seems to be "Spend money like drunken sailors in a bordello after 2 years at sea, throw the borders wide open, and let the Democrats do what they want." I can see why support for them is falling. :rolleyes:
 
First, I do not see the purpose of "tenure." It should not exist. If someone could explain the reason for its existance to me, I'd appreciate it, though I doubt any valid reason exists.

Tenure allows conservative instructors and researchers to stay in their jobs and voice their beliefs despite an increasingly liberal academic environment.
 
Waitone said:
I have an uncle who watched with dismay the California of Wyoming. He said that in his part of the world the locals want to meet Calif refugees at the border, give 'em water and food and a little rest, then gut shoot 'em and send 'em back.

A little rough but maybe he's on to something.


Socialism seems to be the virus that could kill the Republic. Socialist vote themselves handouts and bankrupt their state. Then, they simply move to another state.

Is there anything states can do to prevent this mess from spreading?
 
Let's start with Prop. 73, which would have required parental consent/notification before a minor could have an abortion.
Does not require consent. Notification and waiting period only. Read the freaking initiative. Why should I pay for the state to create a new bureaucracy to nanny children? *** are their parents doing??

Next, Prop. 74 which would have made it easier to fire tenured teachers and made it more difficult for teachers to get tenure.

Again, I fail to see how anyone could argue against this.
They've already got 2 years, why do they need 5? This state needs teachers. Would you, with a degree, go into a job that you know is temporary for the first 5 years knowing that you could be fired at any time??? Also, more bureaucracy for red tape, evaluations and all the other crap extended out for another 3 years beyond what it is now.

Next we have Prop. 75 which would have required labor unions to get express written consent from their members before using their money for political purposes.
Let's get the government to stifle political enemies and tell them how to spend their money. Great idea, Stalin would love it. Plus, more bureaucracy to monitor this crap.

The people have spoken. Suck it up and get over it already.
 
Well....lessee....the lefties took a pounding in Texas yesterday. Proposition 2 banning gay marriage was just written into our state constitution. You can't "bench trial" that one out. You wouldn't believe the amount of money and chaos thrown into this election. They actually had people call my house to ask how I was going to vote. They had others who would call and say "If proposition 2 passes your marriage to your wife will become null"....which was supposed to scare me into voting against it, but hey if I suddenly found out my marriage was null and void.....:evil: ...........um....better not go there.;)

However in Va. NJ. and Ca. the Democrats won soundly it looks like. What else is new?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top