Act Local.
There has been a quiet Libertarian revolution on local levels, especially in the West. If freedom-first advocates keep installing Libertarian or Libertarian-leaning representatives at local levels, then it matters a lot less what the two statist parties do at the federal level. Libertarians don't need "infallible" strategies, they just need to participate. Chasing after "infallible" strategies is tilting at windmills - just get to work.
Obviously Libertarians, and other political parties, do not need nor should they chase “infallible strategies”. Infallibility implies a perfection which humans are incapable of in creating strategies. What Libertarians, and other political parties, need are realistic strategies for the realities of the 21st century. The Republicans and Libertarians can, as Vern Humphrey and Supernaut have claimed as necessary, work hard but working hard is not the same as working smart. Many political causes have failed despite supporters working harder than their smarter working opponents. It is very important to “Act Local” but unfortunately too many people believe strategies and policies that work locally will be just as efficacious nationally and internationally. Just like the design of the M1911 cannot be scaled-up to make a effective .50 BMG, local usually does not scale-up well to national and international effectiveness. Thinking it does is as absurd as thinking you can operate a national economy using the principles of maintaining a household budget.
To keep this on topic, our best advocates on a Federal level are the SAF and NRA-ILA. Keep the donations flowing, lead by example, emphasize in every conversation that you can, how ineffective Federal "solutions" are for local/regional issues. Manhattan is not even remotely the same as Albuquerque, not just for guns, but for pretty much every issue one can imagine.
I agree that SAF and NRA-ILA are the best advocates at the Federal level. I am after all a life member of both the SAF and NRA. I disagree that all Federal “solutions” are ineffective for local/regional issues. When local/regional issues have local/regional laws that conflict with rights Federal law defends, Federal solutions have proven to be very effective.
Don't "Fight the Power," on a local level, instead "Ignore the Power" and remove your consent.
Yaaaaa, you go ahead and ignore and remove your consent of the power of the law and “Go directly to Jail, do not pass Go, do not collect $200”
. Libertarians are 226 years too late for making the United States the paradise of individual freedom they think they can create. The Founding Fathers continuous moved toward the reality that anything remotely like what Libertarians strive for would be the doom of the nation. Articles of Confederation - nope not workable, defense of the nation by reliance on State militias - nope not reliable enough, State authority superseding Federal authority on issues that effect the nation - nope that ain’t working as evidenced by even the most libertarian leaning President, Thomas Jefferson, striving to increase Presidential and Federal power, States having the power of “Nullification” - well that ultimately did not workout as demonstrated by the traitorous political leaders who created the Confederate States of America soon discovering that lack of compliance from the governments of individual States within the Confederacy to the authority of the National government of the Confederacy was a major factor in the destruction of the Confederacy. The principles of Libertarianism dominating the nation would quickly create a nation that would be very easy for a foreign power with a strong national government to dominate and possibly destroy by conquest. China and Russia would be thrilled to have the United States devolve into libertarianism.
Specially this part:
