I definitely agree that the robbery victim was in the right. Will a jury see it that way? I have no clue. However, they should. The robbery victim was clearly not trying to kill the guy to get his stuff back - otherwise, he would have just pulled the trigger instead of yelling "stop." He was just trying to get his stuff (and probably hold the guy for police, thus stopping future robberies) when the robber responded by putting the victim in danger. The victim responds by removing the danger. Duh. One could say that the victim aggravated the robber by pointing a gun first. However, who caused the victim to point his gun in the first place?
~Dale
~Dale