Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Kel-Tec P32 vs. P3AT

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Scott Free, Sep 26, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Scott Free

    Scott Free Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2008
    Messages:
    51
    I've had a P32 for some time. All in all, I'm happy with it, but sometimes wonder if it would be worth the expense to trade up to the P3AT. Would I gain much out of such a short barrel? Who has decided to stick with their P32? :confused:
     
  2. Chuckulator

    Chuckulator Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2005
    Messages:
    87
    Location:
    A Buckeye in MI
    Why don't you pick up a used p3at? That's what I did. I had the p32 and saw a good deal on a p3at so I bought it. So now I have both.

    The lack of rimlock is really the best thing about the p3at. I had rimlock twice with magazines in the p32, but only when racking the slide; it never happened when I was actually shooting it.

    Check out ktog for some good ammo recommendations, e.g. Corbon DPX, Golden Saber, and American Eagle FMJ.
     
  3. EHL

    EHL Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    Messages:
    647
    Location:
    DFW-Great State of Texas
    I'm with Chuck on this. The P3AT is soo cheap when she's used that you could pick one up for well under $200. I paid $169 for mine two years ago. I also agree that rimlock is the definite risk associated with sticking with the 32 acp as a defense round. Too many things to worry about in SD situations to just add this little bugger into the pile.
     
  4. jonnyc

    jonnyc Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    2,317
    Location:
    SE Pennsylvania
    I like my P32, and the P3AT just isn't enough of an improvement for me to trade "up". I use FMJ or long JHP and haven't repeated any of the rimlock I had with shorter rounds. The calibers are too similar to worry about, and I like having that extra round.
     
  5. powwowell

    powwowell Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2007
    Messages:
    325
    Location:
    Eastern NC
    P-32 all the Way

    I use FMJ's in myy P-32. This offers better penetration and negates the rim lock problem. Shooting the P-32 is much more enjoyable than the 3AT. I also like the extra round capacity and the last round slide hold back. For close range self defense, the .32 will do the job.

    Larry
     
  6. jackstinson

    jackstinson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2007
    Messages:
    903
    Location:
    Altair 4
    I went the other way: from a 2nd gen P3AT to a 1st gen P32 and it's been better suited to my situation.
    I use only FMJ S&B which fit the P32 magazine, no rimlock in well over a thousand rounds.
    Now, my P3AT was a great gun, 100% reliable with many many shots through it and no troubles, but it beat the heck out of my right hand when shooting. I like to practice a lot with what I carry....and I don't wear shooting gloves for practice, because I don't wear shooting gloves in everyday life. Switching to the P32 enabled me to practice a lot without the "4th magazine tremors" setting in as with the P3AT. Not everyone experiences this. I don't get these trauma tremors with my larger full-size pistols, but I did with the P3AT. So if your physical shape/condition handles the fit and recoil of the P3AT (or LCP) well, it's a good choice; if not the P32 is a good choice. Not much difference between the .32acp and .380acp from that short of a barrel.
    Jack
     
  7. fxstchewy

    fxstchewy Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2008
    Messages:
    439
    I have had a P-32 2nd Gen for awhile, carry with Buffalo bore in chamber and on top of mag the rest are FMJ's, it has never given me a problem.
     
  8. DrDremel

    DrDremel Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    317
    Location:
    Mt. Clemens, MI
    I prefer the P32. It is easier to shoot, in the size of the pistols, the difference between the two rounds is not enough to make the recoil worth it. I like the extra round and slide lock. Most people don't shoot their .380 very much or very well from my experience. Only a very few can shoot it well. I've done some comparisons between shooters that own a Kel Tec .380 and shoot it. I let them try a P32 and they shoot much better. I only practice shooting mine one handed since I assume that either I have a hand injury and lost my primary gun or things are so close that my other hand is being used to fend off an attack. In this situationn, the P32 is just more shootable.
     
  9. jocko

    jocko Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,707
    380

    IMO no comparison, buy the 380 over the 32 any day. More firepower, certainly lower priced ammo around and certainly ALOT more ammo variations to. Some great rounds are out there in the 380 102 grain golden sabre. Corbon dpx, corbon 90 grain hp. all super rounds that will more than outdue any 32 round and oh yes alittle bigger hole to. Nothing wrong with the 32, as there is nothing wrong witht he 25, as there is nothing wrong with the 22 mag, as there is nothing wrong with the 22 long rifle either. just most gun afficados feel the 380 is as low as one should go for a ccw gun...
     
  10. Rex B

    Rex B Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2006
    Messages:
    659
    Location:
    Fort Worth TX
    I vote both. I sold my P32 a year ago, because I already had a P3AT. ended up replacing the P3AT with a new one, and then bought another P32.
    I carry the P3AT when I'm away from the house. The P32 is just enough slimmer and lighter that I prefer if for neighborhood walks, trips to the convenience store etc.
     
  11. JBB

    JBB Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2007
    Messages:
    34
    Location:
    SW Florida
    The P32 is a great little gun. I bought one a couple of months back at a gun show and my son took it home with him when he came for a visit a couple of weeks ago. I'm going to a gun show tomorrow to see if I can replace it. Can't see the need for the .380 (unless I find a hard-chrome P3AT :D). You can debate the merits of this and that caliber all day, but I doubt that anyone would look at your P32 and say, "Go ahead and shoot, its only a .32."
     
  12. kitsapcharly

    kitsapcharly Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    137
    Location:
    northwest
    KT has an accessary for 32 that prevents rim lock from happening.:)
     
  13. MICHAEL T

    MICHAEL T Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2004
    Messages:
    6,011
    Location:
    outback Kentucky
     
  14. Javelin

    Javelin Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2007
    Messages:
    1,042
    Location:
    DFW
    Though many like the P32 I would go with a P3AT as long as its one of the newer models made from 2007 on...

    Choosing between a .32 and a .380 (though John Browning carried a .32) I will pick the .380 as it actually achieves 12" of penetration with FMJ.

    :)
     
  15. Rustynuts

    Rustynuts Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    730
    Keep the P32 and wait for the Kahr 380 to come out!
     
  16. Quiet

    Quiet Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2007
    Messages:
    3,061
    Location:
    bouncing between the 909 & the 702
    I've carried my 1st gen P-32 for about 7 years now.
    When I got it the P-3AT was not yet released.

    It's never given me any major problems and I only encountered one minor problem (FTF with 10 round magazine, contacted Kel-Tec, they mailed new magazine spring, problem solved) which was fixed by Kel-Tec for free.

    I've handled the Kel-Tec P-3AT & Ruger LCP, and concluded that they are not that much of an upgrade to justify the cost of converting from .32ACP to .380ACP.

    I'm waiting to see if Kahr Arms ever releases the P-380 before determining if I really need to get rid of my P-32 for something else.
     
  17. Stevie-Ray

    Stevie-Ray Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,058
    Location:
    Mitchi-gun, the Sunrise Side
    As above, when I got my P32, there was no P3AT. I probably would have bought the P3AT but don't see the sense in changing, now. I'm still kicking around the idea of the Ruger LCP, though.
     
  18. polizei36

    polizei36 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2008
    Messages:
    56
    Location:
    Colorado
    I just bought another (my second) p32 this month NIB. I load it with Fiocchi 60 gr sjhp. No issues and I have shot 400 rounds so far out of it (100 rds each session). My 380 version bites the web of the hand to much when shooting, which results in me not practicing with that one very often. Even with as little as 400 rds fired I have become very good with the p32 and can control the groupings much better then I ever could with the 380. So that equates to 8 controllable COM hits to the BG if need be....I'm confident in the p32's abilities to stop an encounter when loaded with the SJHP from Fiocchi.
     
  19. deputy tom

    deputy tom Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    934
    Location:
    Pennsyltucky
    I'm staying with my P-32.It works and if I want to upgrade I'll go for a .45acp.YMMV.tom.:cool:
     
  20. Harold Mayo

    Harold Mayo Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,073
    Location:
    Hutchinson, Kansas
    I have a P3AT and don't really like it. I don't have any really better view of the .380 as a defensive round than a .32 and the P3AT (mine, anyway) is VERY prone to malfunctioning if you limp wrist the slightest bit. My P32 was much more forgiving. I'm thinking about switching. They are more of what one guy referred to as "get off me" guns than anything, anyway. If you were to ever use one defensively, I think you're probably going to just dump the magazine into the guy and then run or use the advantage given thusly to fight him easier. CNS shots aren't all that easy with the little guns.
     
  21. orionengnr

    orionengnr Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2005
    Messages:
    5,434
    If you have shot both, you have noticed the difference in recoil--and it is a pronounced difference.

    There is a reason for that--it is called "energy". Remember Newton's First Law?

    I've owned both the P-32 and the P3AT, and after firing both back to back, I would never carry a .32. To be honest, I am "iffy" about the .380 round and consider it a bare minimum. The .32 is so far below that threshold I cannot justify carrying it.

    I gave mine to the wife of a good friend. She is not quite 5', maybe 90 pounds dripping wet and is quite recoil sensitive.

    I'd rather she had the P-32 than a can of OC spray, but that is about the only justification I can make for the P-32.

    I guess a sharp stick is better than nothing, but you won't find me trusting my life to one...
     
  22. jocko

    jocko Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,707
    380 over a 32 any day, ANYDAY. If one thinks the 380 is at the low end of the gun poll, then the 32 should not even be mentioned. Sure less recoil in the 32, LESS GUN TO.
     
  23. kokapelli

    kokapelli Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,574
    Location:
    Arizona
    I had two P32s and when the P-3AT came out I purchased one.

    It didn't take long for me to decide to sell the two P32s and get another P-3AT.

    First off for me I found the P-3AT to be more accurate than the P32, there is a much better selection of ammo in 380, it eliminated the rim-lock worry and last, why have two calibers in the same size pistol.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page