RealGun
Member
The "+p" is 38 Special, while the new Kimber is rated for 357 Magnum...still no particular comparison to this Colt diversion.
A fine line between disagreeing and bullying. It made sense to me. When I squeeze with a DA I have to compensate for the force toward the weak hand side. When I pull, my concentration is on the rearward direction rather than the overall compression of a "squeeze". It really is all just the alternative to jerking, trying to capture the unsteady sight picture. The rest is in the skill with the details. For me the real challenge is in just holding the gun steady, something that seems more challenging with age.
Yeah. What you just said, 'specially about the 3" K-frames. I could settle for a 3" model 36 though until a nice used, well preserved model 65 (3", round butt) comes along.S&W,please re-instate the 3" J (maybe K) frame DA/SA revolver !
Pay heed Ruger, Colt, Charter, and others !
Also, on another venue, the 5" was a fab-u-lous handgun !
Kimber, get real with your prices !
That was something I was pondering as well.I wonder if something like the kimber revolver could wind up being a tiny 7 shot 327? That would be interesting enough to me that I might actually pony up for one.
It would be a pretty expensive and risky venture to design and build a revolver from the ground up. What are the chances that Kimber is importing this revolver from a competent revolver maker overseas?
I wonder if something like the kimber revolver could wind up being a tiny 7 shot 327? That would be interesting enough to me that I might actually pony up for one.
Oh, and make one in 9mm too
I wonder if something like the kimber revolver could wind up being a tiny 7 shot 327? That would be interesting enough to me that I might actually pony up for one.
Still round in the back though, I must add.
Much shorter.
Smooth, can't give you the DA poundage & it has a slightly different leverage, but subjectively giving my impression- compares very favorably.
Denis