LCP II "Enhanced Interrogation" Test

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 19, 2012
Messages
91
Location
Central Texas
Enhanced interrogation = not quite torture, but some may consider it abuse.

BACKGROUND:

I carried a Springfield XD-9 subcompact for a few years, but it was not a convenient EDC option for me because of the thickness and weight combined with my clothing. Texas summer is long, and in winter I rarely wear more than a long-sleeve shirt. I wanted to maximize comfort, even at the expense of caliber and shot capacity. Also, open carry is not legal in my workplace and many coworkers are firearm phobic. The only “external safety” I want on an EDC pistol is the holster. These considerations led me to the LCP II. Below I review it in several categories in descending order of how important they are to my situation. I’m not a fanboy of Ruger or of anything; I try to be objective about evaluating how the tool meets my subjective needs. The categories in order are: Comfort, Concealability, Reliability, Draw, Accuracy, Trigger, Recoil, & Finish.

ENHANCED INTERROGATION TEST:

I took it to the range right out of the box. Then, I pocket carried it for about three months of summer. I got it wet a few times, but not submerged. I got it damp with sweat several times by riding my bicycle with it or hiking. I put it into my wet pocket after swimming. I left it in my pocket all the time collecting a bunch of lint in the little empty space where you would expect a tactile striker condition indicator. I never cleaned it.

COMFORT: A+

I can’t count how many times I’ve fallen asleep on the sofa with it in the pocket holster that came with it. I’m not a heavy sleeper; rather, I tend toward insomnia. Most of the time, I can’t feel it’s there. I hope I don’t get into trouble by forgetting that I have it on me. It is a lot more comfortable than the XD-9 subcompact was.

CONCEALABILITY: A

My swim shorts have pockets. I carry in those with no problem. Khakis and slacks at work: no problem. I do print a little bit if I have my foot up so my leg is 90 degrees. It prints an angular shape, but not an obvious gun shape.

RELIABILITY: A

First trip to the range with it fresh out of the box, I had an early stovepipe. I think it was because the slide hit my support hand. After that, I went through a hundred rounds of 94 gr. FMJ without any failure. I never shot any HP or other ammo.

Second trip to the range after months of mild neglect, I drew it, lint and all, straight from my pocket and it fired the whole session without any failures. I didn’t count the rounds, but I went through several magazine changes. All was the same FMJ. That’s all I want from my EDC: to forget about it most of the time and then have it function when I finally draw it.

DRAW: A- (Reaching into the pocket to find the grip is a little slow; every pocket is different.)

The pocket holster that came with it works. It’s thin, so it doesn’t add much bulk to my pocket. (It can print a little.) The design is simple but effective. If I grab the pistol, the pistol comes out of my pocket and the holster stays in. If I grab the holster, I can take the pistol out still holstered. If for some reason, I grabbed the pistol but it came out with the holster still on, a flick of the trigger finger will discard the holster. It works as it should.

ACCURACY: What accuracy? .

Somewhat heavy trigger, plus short sight radius equals be sure you’re close.

It’s a pocket mouse gun for self defense. In my mind, mouse-gun self-defense shooting is not a long-range gun fight. It’s just outside hand-to-hand combat distance. I’ve only shot it at 21 feet. First time at the range, both my 90 lb noodle-armed kid and I put everything on the torso with plenty of room to spare. That’s good enough for my purposes. Second time at the range, my first shot hit the little 1.5 inch circle in the middle of the paper. It startled me. I actually stopped and looked at the little .380 as if to find something broken. I was confused. There is no reason for me to be a good shot with a pistol, especially this one. I’ve been a rifle guy all my life. I don’t even enjoy pistol shooting or any paper target range shooting.

The rest of the session, shots hit in or very near that little circle. My all-day group was about the size of a plump ruby red grapefruit + two flyers. I’m blaming the wind. Texas is about to absorb a hurricane. That should have been another all-in-the-torso-and-that’s-good-enough group, especially since half the magazines were shot fast. (Interestingly enough, the flyers happened with slower, aimed fire.)

TRIGGER: B

It’s a little heavy. But it’s not bad at all compared to other double-action or striker-fired weapons. I noticed it more right after shooting my Blackhawk. Heavy trigger is what I get for not wanting to train myself to draw and click off the safety. I’ll take it. The worst trigger I’ve squeezed was on a friend’s Smith & Wesson Sigma; it’s not nearly that bad. It’s not quite as good as I remember the XD-9, but it’s fine for a defensive pistol. I never felt like it was hindering me.

RECOIL: B+

I reckon you could shoot .380 through a soda straw. My dominant hand has some lingering deep nerve damage from a recent dog bite right into my wrist joint. There wasn’t enough recoil to aggravate my wrist. Back when I got the XD-9 subcompact, several people told me it was too small for 9 MM and the recoil would be unbearable. I didn’t experience that at all. My two 60 and 70-pound noodle-armed kids didn’t seem to mind the XD-9 either. Likewise, the LCP II doesn’t have much noticeable recoil. It’s a quick little snap, but not bothersome. Some folks advocate putting some puffy tape on the grip.

FINISH: C

As expected, my sweat caused some surface rusting straight away, especially on the mag release button and other high points. Thanks to an old timer on here, I was ready with the Johnson’s Paste Wax. Problem solved. I hastily wiped some on, rubbed it in, and holstered it a little sloppy. No more rust appeared during the rest of the enhanced interrogation.

Edited to add:
DISASSEMBLY AND CLEANING: Disassembly is a little pain. You have to push the slide back just a couple millimeters and simultaneously pull a small flat retention pin out. It's hard to get a grip on that pin without scratching the finish. It's hard to get it aligned just right because there is no clear indication of how far, except for when the pin comes out. (At least getting it back in is easier because you can see the hole line up.) One time, I had it fly out and fortunately, it hit a window so that I had an auditory indication of where it went. I do not like this at all. If I wanted to shoot this gun a lot, requiring frequent disassembly and cleaning, I would probably get aggravated long before I got good at it. I found a perfect tool for pulling out the pin without scratching the finish: a hole punch. Actually, the hollow handle of the hole punch has a rounded contour that allows you to get behind the little head on the retention pin and pry it without scratching the slide.

Bottom line: Keeper.
 
Last edited:
I have a second generation LCP. It's a bit smaller than the LCPII and hammer fired. It's been 100% reliable through over 500 rounds and is definitely easy to carry. Even though the trigger is heavier than the LCPII, with practice it's not hard to be accurate. I have found that I can ring an 8X10 steel plate at 30 yards with regularity as long as I do my part. While .380 may not be the best defensive round, a gun you will always carry is way better than the one you left at home when trouble arrives.
 
I have a pair of LCP Gen 1's, a Gen 2, a Custom, and an LCP II. The trigger in the II is the best, and the LRHO is nice, but I prefer the Gen 2 sights and grip, especially with the Hogue grip wrap. I carry a Gen 1 more often than any of the others, just out of habit - something on 7 or 8 years with this one now.
 
Fantastic review. I love my LCP II. I've got it in my pocket as I type. The family and I took a little walk downtown, and I like to travel light. Little Kershaw Automatic knife in one pocket, LCP II in the other. I forget it's even there.

It certainly is a keeper.
 
Thank you all for the positive comments.
I was just out in the garage sorting the empty brass from the last range trip. I noticed that several of the empty .380 cases had similar flat spots right at the case mouth. I presume it's happening on extraction/ejection of the empty case. I've had those flat spots before on a bolt action when ejecting with enough force to fling the brass out. Anybody else have this? I'm not sure I'll even reload for .380 because I might not shoot it enough to make it worthwhile. (Also, it's a pain to find the little buggers in amongst the boxcar loads of 9MM brass on the ground at the range.)
 
I agree with pretty much everything in this well written review. I have several pocket carry guns in my collection now including my trusty old 642, a Glock 26 (yeah it's a little large for most pockets), a Kahr CM9, and an LCP II I picked up last spring. Guess which one gets used 90% of the time. So easy to carry I honestly don't even notice it anymore. Mine has been 100% reliable and so far no rust. If I lived in Chicago instead of rural Minnesota I might use one of my other pocket carry options but for my purposes this little sweetheart gets the job. :)
 
I got mine last week and concur with everything you said except the part about the pocket lint. Please clean any pocket gun often. That stuff getting behind a hammer can cause lots of problems.

Overall, the LCP II, looks to be a great elevator gun.
 
Last edited:
I got mine last week and concur with everything you said except the part about the pocket lint. Please clean any pocket gun often. That stuff getting behind a hammer can cause lots of problems.

Overall, the LCP II, looks to be a great elevator gun.

I'm glad to get your comment about the pocket lint. After my second range session, I checked the lint collection area, and the lint had apparently been thrown out by firing. I still wonder how much it takes to cause problems. Surely, you must be right that enough of it can cause problems. The reason I left it alone and mentioned it was that in a "torture test," I saw a guy submerge his LCP II in water, manually pack lint into it, and so on. That being unrealistic in its extremity, I decided to do some more realistic testing. I would be glad to get more input on the lint question.

This brings me to a negative that I forgot to mention in the original review:

DISASSEMBLY AND CLEANING: Disassembly is a little pain. You have to push the slide back just a couple millimeters and simultaneously pull a small flat retention pin out. It's hard to get a grip on that pin without scratching the finish. It's hard to get it aligned just right because there is no clear indication of how far, except for when the pin comes out. (At least getting it back in is easier because you can see the hole line up.) One time, I had it fly out, and fortunately it hit a window so that I had an auditory indication of where it went. I do not like this at all. If I wanted to shoot this gun a lot, requiring frequent disassembly and cleaning, I would probably get aggravated long before I got good at it. I found a perfect tool for pulling out the pin without scratching the finish: a hole punch. Actually, the hollow handle of the hole punch has a rounded contour that allows you to get behind the little head on the retention pin and pry it without scratching the slide.

I do not like that it's nigh on impossible to disassemble it bare-handed. I hate that you have to do the "slide and pry" parlor trick to get it apart.
 
The other area that lint and such may present a problem is under the hammer. The LCP II with a round in the chamber puts the hammer in a cocked position. Any debris that can fall into that area could definitely cause a malfunction. Best to check that area at the rear of the slide every time you remove the gun from your pocket.
 
First of all, congrats on your new LCPll. As a pocket gun enthusiast that shoots pocket guns weekly, I have to take exception to your post that the trigger is heavy. I have been shooting the LCP's since they first came out and have owned four of them. Currently still own a LCP Gen2. (not to be confused with the LCP ll). You say the trigger is heavy? On the contrary, I found the trigger to be way too light for a Pocket gun. The LCP gen2 has,IMO the best trigger of the LCP's and cannot understand why Ruger went with this new Striker style version. I personally did not like the new trigger at all for various reasons. The main reason being I feet the trigger to be seriously unsafe. After the weird freeplay and take up, it has a very short crisp, light Bang.
This has been a major controversy on the LCP forum for a long time, until the debate got to the point that it became so inflamed that they never mention it any longer. And not to start the debate here, but simply to make the awareness that safety may be on concern for newbie shooters to consider.
I personally no longer shoot the LCP as I have moved on to other pocketguns. But my recommendation of the LCP's on the market the best choice would be the LCP and not the LCPll. Plus you would save about $100.00. Both guns shoot about the same as far as recoil etc.
This is just something to consider for others. The LCP is a great first gun, very reliable, if you do not shoot often and do not mind the slappy recoil. There are other pocketguns that shoot so much more mild, if recoil is something of concern or desire.

Here is a Warning from a Major holster maker that I would have to agree on. If you like the gun and feel it is safe then by all means enjoy.

http://www.unclegeorgeswalletholsters.com/Pages/LCPIIWARNING.aspx
 
I love my 6yo LCP and really want to invest in a II sometime soon. Living where I do I feel totally comfortable pocket carrying the LCP as my only carry gun. When I'm feeling froggy I'll pull out the Shield or P-01 and a nice pancake and head out. Otherwise the LCP fits the bill...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top