LCR22 and the Big Punch!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jeb Stuart

member
Joined
May 4, 2017
Messages
3,260
Location
Confederate Country and proud of it!
About 3 1/2 years ago, I started shooting the Ruger LCR9mm, I became a instant fan. Lousy shot when I first started shooting, but so many frequent range trips down the road has really changed that. Not to mention, it is just one very fun gun to shoot. It was only natural to continue to want to improve that shooting with the LCR22.
Turns out to be one of the best investments I have made in my shooting life. The Trigger pull on the LCR is as many know just a great double action. The 22.cal is about two lbs. heavier, but actually a good thing for training.
Indoor target shooting or outdoor plinking, the LCR22 is every bit as fun as his big brother, but a whole lot cheaper. And it makes such a wonderful trainer.

Yesterday I took the Little Snubbie to the indoor range. Ran a 100 rds of standard ammo, then 100 rounds Aguila Interceptor. Man! that ammo delivers a Punch!! It does NOT feel like 22. cal. A huge change in felt recoil. This just added to the Pleasure of shooting this gun. I bought a 500 rds from Sportmens guide for $39.00. Yes, a little more expensive, but worth the fun.

This could be a way for a New Shooter to learn how to shoot a revolver and especially a snubby. Start off with standard ammo and move up the ladder to the higher recoil of the Interceptor, (just a thought).

The stronger trigger of the LCR22 makes a good transition to the LCR9mm I went on to shoot.
I was able to get in 200 rounds of training in before the more expensive 9mm, the 9mm trigger actually felt smoother, so it was a winning combination for Snubbie training.
*note-all flawless shooting-and I honestly can not remember have a bad round shot out of this gun. The standard ammo I used yesterday, was some old S&K which runs fine. Stickly ammo, but shoots ok. Especially for the fast action shooting I was doing.

Ps A new Smith 642 arrives on Tues.

0OPluvK.jpg
 
Last edited:
Jeb Stuart

I also like to start out with a .22, be it a revolver like my wife's Model 34, or else a semi-auto Ruger Mk.II or Beretta Model 70S. Helps me get my timing down and a little extra trigger time with a .22 is always a good thing for me.
 
Jeb Stuart

I also like to start out with a .22, be it a revolver like my wife's Model 34, or else a semi-auto Ruger Mk.II or Beretta Model 70S. Helps me get my timing down and a little extra trigger time with a .22 is always a good thing for me.

Not to mention it gives extra time at the range for less money. I hate to take the time to prepare for a range session and go though a few boxes of ammo and it is over it seems before you get started. 200 or 300 rounds of 22, perhaps through a few different guns, adds more fun to the session and help hone those skills along the way at a fraction of the cost.

And getting back to the INCEPTOR AMMO. I do not know how it cycles in a semi. but the revolver, it really does add a significant punch and noise. Nice to get a more realistic feel with the snub nose.
 
And getting back to the INCEPTOR AMMO. I do not know how it cycles in a semi. but the revolver, it really does add a significant punch and noise. Nice to get a more realistic feel with the snub nose.

Inceptor Ammo was originally designed around a semi-auto. The first offerings were .380, 9MM and .45. Revolver ammo came later. I carry the 77 grain .38 Special exclusively in my LCR 357...been toying with the idea of stepping up to the wicked fast .357.
 
I have three handguns that I'm a pretty good shot with,,,
Not a competitive prize winner mind you,,,
But dang competent all in all.

CZ-75B, Bersa Thunder 380, and S&W 36.

I'm a firm believer that I shoot them well because I also have the .22 LR versions of those guns,,,
The cheap ammunition allowed me to have lots and lots of range time with them,,,
I'm a firm believer in .22 LR under-study guns for practice.

Also I just like collecting rimfire/centerfire pairs,,,
I own eleven of those pairs in all.

Aarond

.
 
Sorry guys but I'm willing to bet you aren't getting close to 1470 fps out of the LCR.

Dave
 
Of course not. Was not expecting to. I was shooting the gun to simulate more recoil for point and shoot training. Still, it felt like the bullets were screaming out of the little snubbie. I will take a Chrony up to the range in the near future to see what it is actually doing. There is a video of a guy shooting different barrel lenghts, starting with a 5" barrel. I will see if I can find it.
 
Last edited:
Sorry guys but I'm willing to bet you aren't getting close to 1470 fps out of the LCR.
Dave
A 9MM shooting 80 grain Inceptor ammo is chronographing at around the 1350 fps mark. I haven't seen any of the stats on the 88grain .357 round, but I'd venture a guess it's eclipsing the 1470 mark.
 
I've shot it from my Mk II, works like a charm. And yes, it does have a bit more noise and recoil than standard velocity or "high velocity" 22 LR. I've noticed it even smells different when shooting it indoors.

I also noticed is shot a tad higher than the others, so I had to bring my bullseye aim down about 3/4" at 25 to center it.

Stay safe!
 
My apologies...when I saw the Inceptor ammo mentioned I thought you were making reference to it and your 9MM...I NOW see the discussion was centered around the .22 ammo. Thus the title of the thread.
 
I picked up an LCRx 3 in. 22 mag that is a blast to shoot. While not as cheaply as a 22LR still at a substantial savings over 38 spl ammo with the same end result...a hole in the target.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top