LEO's--how do you really feel

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hey, don't be hard on yourself. Beauty comes from within... (I'm a fat, middle-aged guy)
Hey, just the fact that your a women with kids in the car makes a difference. I know I would be less leary if I was an LEO in that situation.
 
I have no problems with the law-abiding citizenry CCWing. I have a grave problem with the criminals doing it. I'm also bright enough to recognize that the latter group does it anyway, regardless of the state of CCW laws. ;)

While merely possessing a CCW license does not automatically make someone a good guy (we've had a few arrests: trafficking in narcotics, legally CCWing a gun taken in a burglary), I can't think of too many better indicators of someone being OK. I'm much less worried about the nervous guy with the S&W 642 and the CCW card than I am the hard thug with a rap sheet as long as my arm and a Lorcin in his pocket.

Mike
 
Oh, and I agree with the comment about the Sullivan Law skewing people's perceptions in NYC. RIght now, the only people NYPD encounter with guns CCWed are other cops and criminals. We're going through the same thing here in the Buckeye State. The more excitable officers and politicians are still waiting for the tidal surge of blood to roll down the streets, now that CCW is legal. It has to happen...it must...Toby Hoover told us it would...

In a few years we'll wonder what all the fuss was about.

Mike
 
Boogyman said:
No offense, Pax, but you are a woman, and possibly an attractive one, and male police officers do tend to treat women differently. I'm not saying it's o.k, but it is a reality. Having kids in the car helps also.
As a single male, my experiences in WA have been a little different. (see my earlier post)
Having said that, I believe if I had broken the speed limit as often as you do, I probably would have gotten a lot more tickets, therefore learning my lesson.
This may be a good argument for more female officers, just to balance things out...:p

Im a 26 year old male in metro Seattle, not particularly clean-cut and have had a CPL since my 21st birthday. I've been pulled over a dozen or so times, never recieved a ticket. I have met some real jerks though (state patrol).

It really depends on which agency is pulling you over. If you get nailed by a motorcycle cop or a WSP car you are gonna get a ticket, otherwise it depends on various factors, but no guarantees.

I've met the full spectrum of attitudes towards CCW from police officers. Everything from the blindingly ignorant MMM types to outright libertarians. We dont get anything approaching a random-sample on this site so there isnt really much stock in what we read here.
 
I'm not LEO but...

I too would like to see more people take it upon themselves to train regularly with their CCWs. Here in CT we have some local guys with fairly decent credentials willing to take their spare time and show you stuff for FREE and I am always surprised that so few people take advantage of this. At the very least they will improve you and your loved ones chances of survival and lessen those of the BGs. I'd go so far as to say that IMHO it is irresponsible for a CCW to not strive to become and remain proficient with their weapon.
 
nyresq said:
but in all seriousness how many people out there with a ccw permit have had ANY formal training and I don't mean the stupid 8 hours in a class room so I can get my permit BS? That percentage is going to be very, very small.

I teach the class required for a CHL in Ohio.

My experience is that most students who take my CHL course already have considerable firearms experience, are knowledgable and responsible shooters, and have had considerable practice and training in addition to the course.
Many are also hunters, which means that they have also had the benefit of a hunter education course, which includes many of the same aspects of firearms safety.

Ohio also requires students to re-take a CHL course on a regular basis to maintain their license.

Personally, I've been averaging about two training courses per year and thousands of rounds of ammunition. This is a bit higher than most of my students, but your suggestion that most CHL holders have no training other than the 8 hour course (Ohio requires 12 hours) is simply not born out by my experience.

Michael Courtney
 
The reason I shoot IDPA and attend other club shoots is to improve my gun skills, preferably while under stress. I have no dillusions that IDPA will give me super goblin killing powers, but I take it for what it is, an exercise that makes you think on your feet and are required to shoot well and fast if you intend to do well.
 
EghtySx said:
What kills me are people who think that just because they are in NY or Kali they can make rules for the rest of us. What you people do there, how you live, your habits and knowledge, are so different from someone living in ... well, pretty much anywhere else, that you have no idea what it is like in the real world. Your culture is entirely different from the cultures of other areas. That's why we have states. Do what you want in your own backyard and leave the rest of us alone. Just because you big city wierdos can't handle something doesn't mean you have to try and pass laws controlling the rest of us. Many of us grew up with our guns and with no formal training can handle them better in our teens than you ever will.

Point is, every place is different. Do what you gotta do in in freakville, leave the normals alone.


Very passionate. ;) And a good post.
 
Harve Curry said:
The problem with New York and firearms/handguns is the Sullivan Law which has effected the knowledge, understanding, and thinking of the general population about handguns and the 2nd Amendment for 100 years now. It is a rarity to see handguns there or people who really know much about them.


Very good post. A lot of people don't understand the affect that law has had.
 
Shootcraps said:
nyresq makes a good point. There probably are a lot of citizens carrying that could benefit from a little extra training beyond what their license calls for. I have seen people at the range who knew little beyond, "Point it that way and pull the trigger". Carrying concealed IS a big responsibility.

But, even though they get a fair amount of training, not all LEOs are gun folks. It's been estimated that 60-75% of them just look at it as part of their job and do the minimum necessary to qualify. I've heard of cops who only visit the range a week before their quals so they can practice up. ;)

I realize this is an oldish thread, but I just had to say that many LEO's DON'T just visit the range a week before their quals to practice up---they just go to the range to qualify period!

BTW, you can't get a driver's license without at least a written and road test. Why shouldn't there be at least one or the other to get a gun license? I'm not a hunter, but if I'm not mistaken, to get a hunting license you have to take a hunter's safety course, right?
 
<<< Not LEO.

Not even ex-LEO.

But ... with all the comments regarding CCW training, wouldn't it be nice if a proper gun safety course (complete with CCW regs review) be part of a high school elective offering?




< POP >


Oh man, I was dreaming again.


Just to show how drastically things have changed, my JrROTC high school class did the same before we went out to the back 40 on the school property and marksman qualified with 22 rifles. That was 1979. I bet they don't do that today.

:(
 
We should ALL have to train and qualify on the same test. The only paper work required should be your birth certificate and a photo ID (like your drivers license).
LEO's prove everyday their no better then the rest of us, and some are alot worse.
 
I'm a 15 year veteran of LE and I am a constitutionalist. I think you should be able to carry without a permit and the only place you can't carry should be court rooms(not court houses but rooms) and jails/prisons. Cops don't carry in those 2 places either except for those working and doing the job. I would love to see the current hoopla over Katrina bring communities back to having town/city/community sponsored militias. I don't believe in quailification or tests to carry becasue the government has no business saying who may or may not carry.As the saying goes "what part of shall not be infrimnged don't people get"?

Currently I am seriously considering leaving LE due to the changes I see in the caliber of the people, the attitudes of the people , and the coming internal problems in america. The police today have an attitude of I will because I can and I am above you. It is an arrogant , damn near facist attitude and it is growing.Do not get me wrong there are good people out ther but they are becoming fewer and fewer. I know what side I am on and it is of the people and constitution so it may be best for me to leave.
 
Engineer151515 - I think that would be a great idea. In the elementary school I went to we had to pass the Hunter's Safety Course in order to go from 6th grade into seventh. I think more schools should do this. I enjoyed it.
 
perpster said:
I realize this is an oldish thread, but I just had to say that many LEO's DON'T just visit the range a week before their quals to practice up---they just go to the range to qualify period!

BTW, you can't get a driver's license without at least a written and road test. Why shouldn't there be at least one or the other to get a gun license? I'm not a hunter, but if I'm not mistaken, to get a hunting license you have to take a hunter's safety course, right?

Why? Because there isn't an Amendment to the Constitution of this country that says your right to drive a car shall never be infringed. THAT'S why.
 
I'm not a LEO, and being from the N.E., I understand what the former NY LEO was saying, and it is valid. However, I see a parallel situation very similarly, one that some may not like to hear.

These days, (last 10-20 years) the NYPD (or any other N.E. anti-zone) police academy is packed full of people that, thanks to the restrictive laws in NY/NYC//NJ, haven't a clue how a gun works, and had no prior interest.
That could be equally as dangerous Infact, the only Accidental discharge I have ever witnessed in a range or gunshop was a "new-ish" policeman putting one in the floor of Scott Moss/Forest and Field in Norwalk, Ct.

The aptitude for safe handling firearms covers both sides of the fence.
 
I'm an LEO at the State level, and no...I don't mind people having a GA Firearms License or an out of state CCW. In fact, I wish more people had it!

That doesn't mean I think everyone with a CCW is responsible enough to have a gun on all the time, but then, I don't think every person with a driver's license is responsible enough to drive.

Here in GA we praise people with a GA Firearms License... Sometimes I give tips to people who carry open, like if they have a really junky holster and it looks like the gun is gonna fall off or if they just look like a hoodlum open carrying.

Like I tell people, there is responsibility when you carry. Especially when you OPEN carry. Regardless of who you are, a cop or citizen. Sometimes I see people wearing t-shirts that say something wild like "Your mama tasted great last night" and they have a nylon piece of junk holster that doesn't even have a top snap on it with a gun hanging off their shorts that don't even have a belt. I tell them if they wear some nice khaki's, a polo shirt with no logo, and a nice belt, nice holster...people won't even notice.

Here in GA, its great...rarely do people notice a gun on someone...

Back on topic though, LEOs for the most part support CCW and the 2nd Amendment.

In fact, More LEOs support CCW/2nd Amendment/Gun hobby than the other way around. There's more hatred for LEOs here than most anywhere else on the net I've seen. And before you say it, two of my good friends work for the BATFE, both are NRA life members, both are members of gun clubs, and both support the 2nd Amendment and the gun hobby 100%...
 
Optical Serenity; QUOTE: "......In fact, More LEOs support CCW/2nd Amendment/Gun hobby than the other way around. There's more hatred for LEOs here than most anywhere else on the net I've seen. And before you say it, two of my good friends work for the BATFE, both are NRA life members, both are members of gun clubs, and both support the 2nd Amendment and the gun hobby 100%...
_________________________________________________________________

I've noticed critisism more then hate.

BATFE, NRA life and support the 2nd Amendment? Somebody's confused and it ain't me. You cannot work for that organization, believe in your job and support the 2nd Amendment (or the Constitution for that matter) at the same time.

"Support the gun hobby"? must be a LEO phrase.

I had a good friend (now deceased) who was an accomplished lifelong shooter. He won the National Metalic Sillouttes at 3 Points Range in Arizona with a Ruger SB he customized and ammo he loaded. When one of his sons told him he was joining the BATF in California he said "son, when you visit you come see me after 11pm and leave before 6am." And he wasn't kidding.
 
Coronach said:
I have no problems with the law-abiding citizenry CCWing. I have a grave problem with the criminals doing it. I'm also bright enough to recognize that the latter group does it anyway, regardless of the state of CCW laws. ;)

While merely possessing a CCW license does not automatically make someone a good guy (we've had a few arrests: trafficking in narcotics, legally CCWing a gun taken in a burglary), I can't think of too many better indicators of someone being OK. I'm much less worried about the nervous guy with the S&W 642 and the CCW card than I am the hard thug with a rap sheet as long as my arm and a Lorcin in his pocket.

Mike

OMG common sense!

About the WA state cops, that sucks, but it reminds me of FL State troopers. I have had pleasant dealings with Pasco and Hernando deputies but the state troopers are ass-hats, as are the deputies in Clearwater/St Pete area. Too many bored cops and not enough criminals to chase. The state guys are basically just revenuers.

I have heard rumors that Sheriff Nugent is hostile to CCW and gun ownership in general, but since I didnt have to ask his permission, it never came up. May have just been an axe to grind with the guy who told me though.

edit: I'm not law enforcement, but I'm hoping to become a law arguer in the next 3 years.
 
Citizen here.

"Worst one I know of was when I was riding in the van with a friend driving. He got pulled over for a busted tail light (NO, not the same one. We're just good at this stuff, k?) Officer came up to the window. Buddy handed out driver's license & CPL. Officer wanted to take control of the gun, no big deal, his perogative. But in doing so, he swept me. GRRRR. I ducked, he apologized, he took the gun back to his car to do whatever. Officer was plainly much relieved to have control of that gun. Funny thing was, every other adult in the vehicle was armed, and he was relieved because he'd just gotten the firearm away from the only person for whom he had positive ID. Uh, no ticket then, either." I find that absolutely hilarious for some strange reason.

On the guy who feels everyone should have training. I hve a mixed bag on this one. Surely the idiot in the gun store is the exception rather then the rule. While I can agree we should all have training, I for one can't afford the 200+ per class. Hell my biggest obstacle for getting my CHL was the 65 bucks for the thing for crying out loud, but finally swallowed it and went without foor for a week to get it. One of the best decisions I've ever made too I can tell you that, one of my guns has already saved my life. I can't afford any extra training. I do however read alot, and ingrain things into my own head by going over different situations in myhead over and over and over again when I have nothing better to do(sadly more often then not it seems:( ) and I go shooting every chance I get. I strictly adhere to gun safety, and whenever someone handling a firearm doesn't follow even basic guidelines for safety I usually give them the third degree, which often results in an apology and a I didn't think it was so serious which results in another third degree and an yeah you're right.

While people should get more training it isn't always possible, should these people have less right to defend themselves just because they don't have the money to? These people are more at risk because they are forced to live in undesirable area's, but then we have always punished the poor for trying to get ahead. I could go into that to give you examples from my own life but I won't get off the subject. Plain and simple, everyone should get training, but it would be most definately a violation of our rights to require that much training or any training at all. Regardless of how much safer the few idiots might be. Those who give up liberty for safety deserve neither. Simple as that. If there were free training classes offered up by the county or state, I can promise you I would attend. Granted the class her ein Multnomah County Oregon is sort of a joke sort of not, I am still damn proud of my certificate of completion even though I did nothing to get it other then pay my 20 bucks and sit there. The class is officially an hour and a half but generally turns into over 3 hours most of it being back and forth discussion and Q&A, and even some friendly debate resulting in both the citizen and the officer learning a few things. Again I could provide an example where one of his examples dealt with a family incident that was well publicized and I had to correct him on the matter, but I will end up writing about that in another thread somewhere probably.

Sorry for the long post. I seem to do that alot here, but there is so much to say with so many good people on sucha good forum.

Rev. Michael
 
Optical Serenity said:
There's more hatred for LEOs here than most anywhere else on the net I've seen.

Probably not for you, or LEO's in GA.

Remember, CA, NY, NJ, MD, IL are populous states and our experiences are not like those of people in GA.

Not that I hate LEO's, but I'm sure I'd like y'all a lot more if I lived where you're a cop!

Thanks and keep it up!
 
stevelyn said:
I couldn't care less and believe people should carry whatever they wish. The one's I've stopped that have presented a CHL to me, I've cut loose with a warning simply because as a CHL holder they're responsible citizens and a citation is unnecessary to get them to comply.

A lot is to be said about the attitude check, as I don't believe in using traffic enforcement to extort revenue for govt. Good attitude will get you a warning. Being confrontational and acting like an honor graduate from the Outhouse University School of Law and I'll get writers cramp from the cites you'll be issued.

LE is a 95-5 proposition. IOW we deal with about 5% of the population about 95% of the time. Those 5% are the frequent fliers and problem children.
Other than the occassional first time DUIs we generally don't have much contact with the rest of the population.

Out of curiosity I see that your in Alaska. What do you do if they do not have a CCW permit as it is not required in Alaska? I assume you treat them as you describe above if they inform you anyways?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top