Liberals - "Do As I Say (Not As I Do): Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy,"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Desertdog

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
1,980
Location
Ridgecrest Ca
Liberals - "Do As I Say (Not As I Do): Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy,"
Jim Meyers
http://newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/11/1/162756.shtml


A new book by a top investigative journalist exposes the blatant hypocrisy of liberals who loudly espouse principles they disregard in their own personal lives.

In "Do As I Say (Not As I Do): Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy," Hoover Fellow Peter Schweizer reveals the glaring contradictions between the public stances and real-life behavior of prominent liberals including Michael Moore, Ted Kennedy, Al Franken, Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi and Ralph Nader – among others. [NewsMax has a free offer for this new book – Go Here Now.]

"Hypocrisy has proved to be a wonderful weapon for liberals in their war against conservatives," Schweizer writes in the November issue of NewsMax Magazine.

"Yet for all the talk about conservative hypocrisy, there has been very little investigation into the prevalence of hypocrisy on the left."

After two years of research into liberal hypocrisy, Schweizer said, "what I discovered was just stunning."

Schweizer's well-annotated book, published by Doubleday, has just been released and its sure to turn several well-known liberals red with anger.

Among the eye-opening revelations of "Do As I Say":

Filmmaker Michael Moore insists that corporations are evil and claims he doesn't invest in the stock market due to moral principle. But Moore's IRS forms, viewed by Schweizer, show that over the past five years he has owned shares in such corporate giants as Halliburton, Merck, Pfizer, Sunoco, Tenet Healthcare, Ford, General Electric and McDonald's.

Staunch union supporter Rep. Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) has received the Cesar Chavez Award from the United Farmworkers Union. But the $25 million Northern California vineyard she and her husband own is a non-union shop.

The hypocrisy doesn't end there. Pelosi has received more money from the Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees union than any other member of Congress in recent election cycles.


But the Pelosis own a large stake in an exclusive hotel in Rutherford, Calif. It has more than 250 employees. But none of them are in a union, according to Schweizer, author of "The Bushes: Portrait of a Dynasty" and a regular contributor to the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and other periodicals.

The Pelosis are also partners in a restaurant chain called Piatti, which has 900 employees. The chain is – that's right, a non-union shop.

Ralph Nader is another liberal who claims that unions are essential to protect worker rights. But when an editor of one of his publications tried to form a union to ameliorate miserable working conditions, the editor was fired and the locks changed on the office door.

Self-described socialist Noam Chomsky has described the Pentagon as "the most vile institution on the face of the earth" and lashed out against tax havens and trusts that benefit only the rich.

But Chomsky has been paid millions of dollars by the Pentagon over the last 40 years, and he used a venerable law firm to set up his irrevocable trust to shield his assets from the IRS.

Air America radio host Al Franken says conservatives are racist because they lack diversity and oppose affirmative action. But fewer than 1 percent of the people he has hired over the past 15 years have been African-American.

Ted Kennedy has fought for the estate tax and spoken out against tax shelters. But he has repeatedly benefited from an intricate web of trusts and private foundations that have shielded most of his family's fortune from the IRS.

One Kennedy family trust wasn't even set up in the U.S., but in Fiji.

Another family member, environmentalist Robert Kennedy Jr., has said that it is not moral to profit from natural resources. But he receives an annual check from the family's large holdings in the oil industry.

Barbra Streisand has talked about the necessity of unions to protect a "living wage." But she prefers to do her filming and postproduction work in Canada, where she can pay less than American union wages.

Bill and Hillary Clinton have spoken in favor of the estate tax, and in 2000 Bill vetoed a bill seeking to end it. But the Clintons have set up a contract trust that allows them to substantially reduce the amount of inheritance tax their estate will pay when they die.

Hillary, for her part, has written and spoken extensively about the right of children to make major decisions regarding their own lives.

But she barred 13-year-old daughter Chelsea from getting her ears pierced and forbid the teen from watching MTV or HBO.

Billionaire Bush-basher George Soros says the wealthy should pay higher, more progressive tax rates. But he holds the bulk of his money in tax-free overseas accounts in Curacao, Bermuda and the Cayman Islands.

Schweizer writes: "Liberals claim to support affirmative action but don't practice it. They support higher taxes but set up complicated tax shelters to avoid paying them. They claim to be ardent environmentalists but abandon their cause when it impinges on their own property rights.

"The reality is that liberals like to preach in moral platitudes. They like to condemn ordinary Americans and Republicans for a whole host of things - racism, lack of concern for the poor, polluting the environment, and greed.

"But when it comes to applying those same standards to themselves, liberals are found to be shockingly guilty of hypocrisy.

"The media and the American people need to hold them accountable."
 
"Halliburton"

He's so dumb he probably misread the name and thought it was a chain of all-you-can-eat fried halibut restaurants.

Well, it seemed funny when I thought of it. :eek:

John
 
Out of all the examples in the article, I liked the Michael Moore - Halliburton one the best as well. I just hope bloggers and other non-MSM folks remember that one when he rears his ugly head in the next Presidential election.
 
The basic premise of liberalism is hypocritical, because it relies on using other people's money to make you feel good. If they want to feel good use their onw money! Obviously, Soros, Moore, Clinton, Pelosi, etc. just want us to pay. They are too elite to have to pay.
 
Your so right, every flaming liberal shop owner I've worked for absolutely hates unions and would try to fire anyone for trying to unionize the business. However those of the more conservetive out look understand how unions benfit the workers, and can easily work with the union and the contracts.
 
"The media and the American people need to hold them accountable." Yes, lets call Dan Rather or John (Sloppy Seconds) Roberts to investigate...
 
Michael Moore owns General Electrics stock? I may be wrong, but isn't that the company that makes these nifty miniguns? :evil:
 
Now what we need to do is to get a court case to get all these people on the stand. WOW. Can you imagine. They like to tar everyone else on the slightest whiff of a possible link to an imagined crime. Now if we can just get the right case where they have all had something to say, or some behind the scenes CONSPIRACY to drag them kicking and screaming to the stand. Hmmmm, something that all libs have communication, trying to influence something???? Sounds like a no brainer to me. Just link them by email to barbara stripesand.:neener:
 
I am sure that this information will be the leading headline tonight on NBC, CBS, ABC, and CNN.



:rolleyes:
 
These limousine liberals can't help it-they're mentally deranged and consider themselves superior to everyone else and thus entitled to special privileges. For example,
Staunch union supporter Rep. Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) has received the Cesar Chavez Award from the United Farmworkers Union. But the $25 million Northern California vineyard she and her husband own is a non-union shop.
Nancy Pelosi
PelosiPoint.jpg

thinks there is no reason or need for union presence in her business, by virtue of her champion of the poor liberal status. It's only necessary for everyone else because they're all inherently evil.
 
Last edited:
R.H. Lee -- Don't you dare ever do that again without a warning first. Geez.
:p
 
These types of book subjects are nothing but below the belt hit jobs. They add nothing to the political discourse in today’s society, and further pull the nation apart into 'Us' and 'Them' camps. One has to read objectively these types of books, since I doubt a lot of the information is accurate, most is probably misrepresented, and exaggerated. For an example, the quote “Staunch union supporter Rep. Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) has received the Cesar Chavez Award from the United Farmworkers Union. But the $25 million Northern California vineyard she and her husband own is a non-union shop.” I have serious problems with this line. First, who is the source for this information? Second, she is a faithful union supporter for years, so her not having a union vineyard has little barring on her support for workers. Third, I doubt many vineyards in CA are unionized; most workers are probably immigrants, since I doubt one could not find enough white people to work 10 hrs a day in the hot California sun. One can go through the whole list and find examples of misrepresentation. Sorry, this is not a real piece of documented work, it is another drive by shooting in the political war, and until both sides give up these attacks, the American people are going to suffer.
 
No, there are those of us out here who see the double standard that the media has. You can be a Klansman and use the "n" word, but if you have a D behind your name you get a pass.

The Liberal Hypocrisy has always astounded me, because they don't see it, and quite frankly they don't care because they see themselves as the elite, and they "care so much" and "feel our pain" so they should get a pass.

If the accounts are untrue, let them answer them.

If they are true, let them stand. We're big enough people to handle it...
 
...this is not a real piece of documented work, it is another drive by shooting in the political war....

And your proof for making these statements is--is what? You've read the book?

It seems to me the issue might be whether or not the book's claims are ACCURATE.

So, are Pelosi's business operations non-union, or not?
 
These types of book subjects are nothing but below the belt hit jobs. They add nothing to the political discourse in today’s society, and further pull the nation apart into 'Us' and 'Them' camps. One has to read objectively these types of books, since I doubt a lot of the information is accurate, most is probably misrepresented, and exaggerated.

Really? This author, although fairly conservative, appears to be a serious guy, unlikely to fabricate or misrepresent facts.

http://www-hoover.stanford.edu/bios/schweizer.html

He is a fellow at the Hoover Inst. at Stanford University.

http://www-hoover.stanford.edu/homepage/about.html
 
I don't care if he is from the Hoover Inst, All I want to know is where he is getting his information. If it is proven to be accurate up to date information, I will take back what I said. Untill he shows his documented sorces, I am not going to take any of his book as accurate or truthful. Right, now it seem to be only a Conservative attack on Liberals. Oh, by the way Fox news is eating this up. Both the O'Reily Factor, the Morning show and Neil's show mentioned this book. Through none of the reporters even asked where he got his information.
 
Then try buying the damned book and reading it - I'm quite confident this guy wouldn't be slinging these inflammatory charges without documenting them. I read an interview of the guy on National Review Online (ewwwwww, a conservative journal), and the guy swears up and down he can document every jot and tittle.

So instead of slandering the guy by accusing him of pumping out a drive-by hit piece, buy the book, read it, document its inaccuracies and then get back to us.

I hear Mary Mapes has a new book out, too - bet yer all over that, eh?
 
Not to rain on a parade, cause I enjoy seeing this stuff get out, but it's the NUMBER of shares Michael Moore owns that is important. In "Roger & Me," for example, he buys shares (or uses inherited or something) in GM so he can get into the shareholder meetings to ask questions and ply his trade (crappy filmmaking), corporations can bar the general public and media but not shareholders as they are private ownership associations and access to meetings and voting is a right of ownership.

I would assume he also holds (probably close to the minimum tradeable) shares in the other corps to give him similar access. The truth would be to see how many shares and what kind of profit he's making.

For example, I was given a share in Budweiser as a Best Man gift but I don't drink the stuff and last I heard they weren't stalwarts on gun rights. Yet, if I were in the public eye and in the Catch-22 of fame HAD to declare my possession of that share and its dividend to avoid shouts of "tax evader" or "closet pro-DWIer" from political enemies I could then be tagged with a pro-Bud label as well.

Which wouldn't truly reflect the context and reality of my share ownership.

There's good argument and there's juvenile finger-pointing. Some of this out-of-context, "gotcha" stuff tends toward the latter.
 
All I want to know is where he is getting his information.

It all comes from publicly available records, and can be checked and verified by anyone. This guy just spent two years doing that, but anyone can duplicate his work if you would like.


Carebear, I don't know how many shares he actually held, but according to the author it was enough that he was making substantial money and that he was having to submit capital gains tax documentation because of that.

But I don't have the book, so I don't have the details. But I think I will stop at the Book Store on the way home from work tonight and pick this one up. Sounds like fun!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top