Book exposes liberal hipocracy...Michael Moore owns Haliburton stock.

Status
Not open for further replies.

jsalcedo

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2002
Messages
3,683
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47662

"I think people find that stuff funny – Michael Moore owns Halliburton stock," said Moore in the Nov. 23 Mott College speech carried by C-SPAN. "That's like a great comedy line. I know it's not true. I've never owned a share of stock in my life -- anything. Did anyone see that a couple weeks ago? Somebody was yakking away. And I just thought, uh, that's funny, I guess. Anyone who knows me is not going to believe that. Who's going to believe that? Just crazy people are going to believe it."




It must be the definition of the word "own" that is the source of controversy, suggests Schweizer, the author of a book on liberal hypocrisy. Moore has emphatically made the claim repeatedly over the years: "I don't own a single share of stock!"

He's right. He doesn't own a single share. He owns tens of thousands of shares – including nearly 2,000 shares of Boeing, nearly 1,000 of Sonoco, more than 4,000 of Best Foods, more than 3,000 of Eli Lilly, more than 8,000 of Bank One and more than 2,000 of Halliburton, the company most vilified by Moore in "Fahrenheit 9/11," according to Schweizer's book.

In fact, the Schedule D form declaring his capital gains and losses where his stock ownership is listed, it's emblazoned on the cover of Schweizer's book.

But Moore's loophole may be that the stock is actually owned by his non-profit foundation – not him personally. However, Moore signed the return personally and controls the activity of the corporation.

It's just one of the titillating, startling revelations by Schweizer, famous for his previous works, "Reagan's War" and "The Bushes."

Other examples:

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, who proclaims her support for unions, yet the luxury resort, the vineyard and the restaurants she partly owns are strictly non-union. While she advocates tough new laws enforcing environmental regulations on the private sector, the exclusive country club she partly owns failed to comply with existing environmental regulations for the past eight years – including a failure to protect endangered species.
Noam Chomsky has made a reputation for calling America a police state and branding the Pentagon "the most hideous institution on earth," yet his entire academic career, writes Schweizer, has been subsidized by the U.S. military.
Barbra Streisand is another proponent of environmentalism, yet she drives an SUV, lives in a mansion and has a $22,000 annual water bill. In the past, she has driven to appointments in Beverly Hills in a motor home because of her aversion to using public bathrooms.
Ralph Nader plays the role of the citizen avenger – the populist uninterested in wealth and materialism, pretending to live in a modest apartment. In fact, he lives in fancy homes registered in the names of his siblings.
This is not just a book of "gotcha" journalism, explains Schweizer. He says the dozens and dozens of examples of "liberal hypocrisy" he cites in his book "are of central importance in evaluating the validity and usefulness of liberal ideas."
 
Well, he's no dummy. He knows GWB presides over the biggest transfer of public wealth since FDR, and Halliburton is a major beneficiary. MM is getting a piece of the pie, that's all.
 
I must say I take issue with the idea that "It's ok if MM completely turns his back on his beliefs because he wants a slice of the pie." For a person who has so stridently pushed his agenda and dedicated so much of his time to "exposing" a certain institution, there simply has to be a values system. If you're opposed to something so vehemently, it's an absurd notion that you are justified in supporting it simply because it benefits you monetarily. Why, without his ideologies and political beliefs, he'd be nothing but a useless sloth!

Oh wait.......
 
I must say I take issue with the idea that "It's ok if MM completely turns his back on his beliefs because he wants a slice of the pie.
Who said he actually believes the bullcrap he spews? His actions say otherwise.
 
"Who said he actually believes the bullcrap he spews? His actions say otherwise"

I would think fans of his tripe would believe him. I could never figure out how anyone could enjoy his stuff. F911 was, especially, sloppy and boring. It would just string together media clippings, have some conspiratorial, short narration that would switch to something else before it made any valid point, then repeat. My favorite part was when he shows Britney Spears saying she likes the President. It literally has no point or relevance whatsoever.

I can generally appreciate when a film or book with a differing opinion is done well, but this was, well, what I think would be expected from a man who composes even himself so sloppily.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top