This "buy American" bandwagon is bunk. I buy the best product for my purposes out there. Doesn't matter if it costs more or less, made in America or Zimbabwe. If it fits my requirements and budget, it's mine.
Lets take this logic a step further. If it's good to buy American, why isn't it better to buy Texan? If it's good to buy Texan, why not buy Dallas, Texan? Do you really think if everything you owned was made in Dallas, it would be superior to products outside of Dallas? Most of the money we pump into China is American companies getting products manufactured there to sell back to Americans. If they're shoddy products, blame the American company for it. If they're cheapo products, blame Americans for buying them. Manufacturers, regardless of country, build products to the specifications of the customer. If a manufacturer screws up, it's up to the company using their services to do something about it. You can blame American companies for not doing quality control and allowing toxic products of theirs to come back into circulation in the USA. What does it say when a company gets product from the manufacturer and doesn't bother testing it to make sure it's to specification?
This brings me to a paradox:
I hear people say "buy American cars" and that buying foreign cars made in America like Toyota means money goes back to the parent company's CEO and corporation. Yet those companies are providing jobs to Americans. So is it okay or not? In the same breath, these people will tell me to not buy something made in China like Apple products because they're working at uncompetitive wages that Americans could never match. Yet, following the logic in the initial argument, doesn't that simply mean that the profits come back to Apple's CEO and corporation, which would be us Americans? If an Apple product costs the Chinese $10 in wages and the rest of the $490 is pocketed by Americans, what's the big deal? You can't have it both ways.
Don't forget that some products are actually cheaper American. For example, Cutco, Henkels, and Shun are top quality cutlery manufacturers, but Cutco is by far the cheapest and makes the best products in a factory in New York. American Industry isn't prohibitively expensive or inefficient. Rather, it is simply not so cheap as foreign industry.
I'd beg to differ. Cutco steel and performance is inferior to the better Henkels line or Shun. No one, NO ONE in the cutlery business other than cheap Chinese-made knives uses 440A stainless. 440C stainless is considered the minimal accepted alloy for average performance. The heat treat might be better than generic kitchen knives using the same steel but it's a lousy steel to begin with. Cutco is a big step up above what 80% of people have in their kitchens (a $50 department store set) but it is nowhere near competitive to the better brands. It is squarely in the middle of the road. Its possible it is equal or superior to the cheaper Henkels found in mainstream department stores. It's cheaper yes, and it also performs at a cheaper level and an annoying marketing strategy. You won't find much on THR but hop on a "particular forum about blades" and it's universal. I've used Cutco and don't care for them. I currently favor Kumagoro knives. They're much sharper, much harder, much lighter, and have superior geometry. They also cost more, but like I mentioned in the beginning, I will pay for a product that suits my requirements.
I will throw in my towel with Fishslayer and Moose1995. I work in the aerospace industry. We often source materials from China and Russia because Americans can't supply what we need. Mainly metals like titanium and stainless steels. Regardless of country-of-origin, if it passes the chemical tests that make it a particular alloy, it's good to go. Do you want me to believe iron atoms in China are inferior to American iron atoms?