"My point was that the numbers can be whatever you make of it. Knowing very well how government procurement works (I don't buy their ammo, but I do buy computers for local law enforcement), I know that most costs can be whatever you want. If they want to use "saving money" on ammo as the reason for this they'll quote the highest price box of whatever they're using now vs the lowest priced box of whatever they want to switch to."
Thanks for making my point. The numbers being used for LE Ammo costs are unfamiliar to you.
a.)Costs of equipment being purchased all depend on who it is the Dept. which has been tasked with the research and procurement, for which project. No, not all governemnt and/or Law Enforcement agencies just spend the taxpayer's monies without respect to the source of the money: tax payers. It is unfortunate that you are familiar with that aspect of an agency in buying computer equipment. However, to apply the logic of that agency's computer buying to ammo. costs for duty weapons is without a foundation for debate.
b.) Your ammo. examples stated have nothing to do with LE duty carry, LE purchase prices when buying in extraordinary bulk, nor are they close to type or brand names of quality duty worthy ammo..
c.) Absolutely, I agree; numbers don't lie, people lie. However, if you are unfamiliar with LE Ammo. purchasing, nor even remotely have an idea of which ammo. is used please refrain from making statements without foundation that also insinuate that all LE agencies are wasteful. That crap gets really old-if you want to villify the spending habits of LE agencies take it to an anti-LE website.