I think you are confusing what I mean by "playing games with my life."ckay and machIVshooter
I hope thats not the same attitude you take towards
owning and handling your firearms.
As a person who is Knowlegeable in Motorcycles and licensed,
Following a car or truck to close on one is not a good choice.
The biker was a hot-head too, and there was no excuse for his behavior.
Even IF the girls struck him first, rather than following them down the road trying to cut them off etc., he merely should've gotten their license number and contacted the police.
He thought he was going to be Mr. Tough Guy and follow the girls home, and there was no telling what he intended to do once he caught up with them. However, he found out the hard way that it's not too bright to follow people home when you don't know who and what is waiting at their home.
Based on the information available at this time, the father was WRONG to shoot. But it wasn't the biker's place to menace the girls and follow them home. You get a license number, then call the police and let them handle it.
Trying to take matters into your own hands like this biker did, isn't smart.
I wouldn't even want to ride into a curb...much less a 3500lb vehicle.Mough ran into their car at one point
All right, all the grandstanding between the cagers and the riders aside, I ride a motorcycle, and I can't imagine intentionally running into a car that outweighs me by at minimum a factor of 5.
punched mirrors off cars?
Keep your head out of your *** and driver like a civil human being, it won't be a problem. Vandalize my car because you're riding too close or fast, it won't be pretty. Comments like this make me glad I sold mine ten years ago. Riding a scoot used to be a symbol of freedom and personal responsibility. Now it seems to be an excuse for overgrown juvenile delinquency.
ckay and machIVshooter
I hope thats not the same attitude you take towards
owning and handling your firearms.
Posted by ckay
And how do you know the biker was menacing the girls? He could have easily just gotten in front of the vehicle safely and instructed the girls to pull off to exchange insurance information. When they decided not to and leave an accident he followed them home to exchange info until he saw the father brandishing a pistol and decided to just turn around and call it a day. Just as easily a scenario as your assumption of the biker being a menace. I wonder how the opinions would differ if it were another automobile.
Your daughters just called to say there's some violent freak following them home, and they're on their way now.IN THAT SITUATION I WOULD HAVE NEVER EVEN BROUGHT A GUN OUT OF MY HOUSE
Your assumption is just as likely as my assumption. That's my point.Yeah sure, buddy.
If you think your scenario is believable, I've got some prime farmland in the middle of the Sahara desert that I'll sell you dirt cheap.
Just wanted to "exchange insurance info". That's rich!
I was run off the road in my van by a car one time. I got his license number, sat right where I was at, called the cops and filed a report. That's how it SHOULD be done.
The biker escalated the situation by following them home, when he only should have followed them long enough to get a license number. He then should've contacted the police.
There are a lot of bikers on the road in my area, and they're just and rude and sorry when it comes to driving as anybody else.
From the information thus far presented, the father was wrong to shoot. If he can't prove self-defense, he deserves prison.
But there's a lot of hot-headed wacko jackos out there these days, as evidenced by news reports around the nation. You have to use your head before following strangers to their homes, because you don't know what awaits there.
It's tragic and I'm sorry it happened, but the biker got shot due to his own blatant stupidity. To simply assume he was just a completely innocent little angel wanting insurance information, is pretty naive IMHO.
This is my only belief in regards to the situation given the present facts. For you to assume otherwise is just as naive as were I to assume what I had posted in #131From the information thus far presented, the father was wrong to shoot. If he can't prove self-defense, he deserves prison.
::donning Wizard of Oz lion outfit::
Cagers and bikers and box pilots, oh my!
Lemmee at 'em! Lemmee at 'em!
I'll twist their noses! I'll frazzle their fenders! I'll punch off their mirrors! I'll brake check 'em, I will! I'll ball peen their trunk lids and kick in their door panels!
I'll cut 'em off at the pass and flip 'em the bird! I will! I really will!
Lemmee at 'em! Lemmee at 'em!
::snort snort!::
::huff puff!::
Lemmee at 'em!
::crunch!:: <-- sound of Logitech mouse being crumpled by mighty and righteously enraged paw of Internet commando in lion costume
Except the teensEveryone involved is at fault and all will pay a price,
This is the most disturbing thread I've ever read on THR.
It's funny. The less information some people have about something, the more they think they actually *know* about it.Yeah sure, buddy.
If you think your scenario is believable, I've got some prime farmland in the middle of the Sahara desert that I'll sell you dirt cheap.
Just wanted to "exchange insurance info". That's rich!
I had two feelings from this thread - 1) An anti would LOVE to see this kind of talk from gun owners, and 2) It's like 9mm vs. 45 debates with regards to absurdity.you know whats funny i see a parallel in the us versus them thinking here and in the i hate cops threads.