USAFRetired
Member
I ran across this op-ed piece yesterday and it got me thinking. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2009/11/10/john-lott-ft-hood-end-gun-free-zone/
I'm retired military and we have a base close by. I can tell you first hand that the military law enforcement / security police are stretched thin and spend most of their time deployed, (to the point that they have contracted private security folks manning the gates).
So, in light of recent events, and since no one is presently allowed to carry on base except LEOs, why not start allowing (requiring) select officers and NCOs to carry an issued sidearm.
There should, of course, be strict criteria and regular GOOD training for those selected.
I belive if something like this had been in place at Ft. Hood things would not have turned out nearly as badly.
I'm retired military and we have a base close by. I can tell you first hand that the military law enforcement / security police are stretched thin and spend most of their time deployed, (to the point that they have contracted private security folks manning the gates).
So, in light of recent events, and since no one is presently allowed to carry on base except LEOs, why not start allowing (requiring) select officers and NCOs to carry an issued sidearm.
There should, of course, be strict criteria and regular GOOD training for those selected.
I belive if something like this had been in place at Ft. Hood things would not have turned out nearly as badly.