Million Mom March Potty Mouth's

Status
Not open for further replies.
maybe thats the answer to a problem, tape them ,post their faces on youtube and any other place.as public figures they cant stop you.this was done at a gun show when the ATF was harassing visitors.they pulled out quick and left.
Man, how do I get them to harass me???

"Agent Himmler, do you know what the word 'litigious' means?" ;)

Did I also mention that I hold grudges, have absolutely no sense of proportion, and have an almost religious aversion to settling meritorious lawsuits involving abuse of governmental power? :D

"Settlement? Gee, I didn't know that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allowed a pound of flesh as a remedy! Oh, ok. I guess we'll be proceeding to trial then..."
 
You'd be skittish about public scrutiny, too, if you'd been with the MMM a few years ago.

I'm not sure everyone here remembers that the MMM used to be an actual organization, albeit tiny compared with what they claimed. They weren't just a name stuck on members of the Brady Campaign.

Then along came Nadja Adolf and Jim March, who noticed that the MMM was using government office space for free and claiming to be a tax-exempt charity. They proved it, and the MMM was more or less destroyed. The Brady Bunch swooped in and picked up the pieces, but the MMM hasn't amounted to much since.

In many local chapters, gun owners outnumber actual MMMers.
 
Mr. Ricker, by the way, is one of the geniuses behind the S&W "Agreement" with the Clinton administration. Remember that one?
 
I would advise against labeling all MMMers because of a few of them.
If you join a group dedicated to stripping people of their rights, don't be surprised when people view all of you in a negative light. I don't expect many people would say don't label all kkk members because of the actions of a few of them. The collective goals of the organization are responsible.

Anyway thanks for the good work guys thats a fabulous video and I'm glad to see stuf like that go on youtube. The 2nd amendment cause is served so well from just stating facts and letting the anti's say whatever they want.
 
I don't expect many people would say don't label all kkk members because of the actions of a few of them.
+1

MMM, KKK and NAMBLA are all dedicated to violating somebody's rights. Anybody who joins any of those organizations knows what they're all about beforehand. If not, they're a fool, and that's not much better.
 
I would advise against labeling all MMMers because of a few of them. Would you like to label all gun owners based on the actions of a few, such as the VT killer, the Columbine Killers, or other gunowners who are bad people.

Apples and radishes, apples and radishes.

In the case of the MMMers: it's an ideological organization with a single bent. In the case of all "gun owners": it's not ideological (you've got gun owners of every stripe and persuasion, and it comprises the majority of the country's populace). One stereotype is focused and valid; the other has no basis whatsoever.

A better analogy would be THR getting all lumped together - and it'd be a reasonably valid one. And no, I (and I doubt many others) owuld mind.
 
what I liked

was the reference to splicing and editing, a Mike Moore tool used in BOC.
It is ok to do that to us in her book, oh and cops are legal experts!
why don't they charge lawyers fee's then?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top